「submission」の検索結果

Workflow 4: Submission rebuttal pipeline. Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds. Use when user says "rebuttal", "reply to reviewers", "ICML rebuttal", "OpenReview response", or wants to answer external reviews safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in the paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports — catching hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations. Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", "引用核对", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile LaTeX paper to PDF, fix errors, and verify output. Use when user says "编译论文", "compile paper", "build PDF", "生成PDF", or wants to compile LaTeX into a submission-ready PDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and monitor OpenShell GitHub issues and PRs using the gator:* state machine. Use when asked to triage issues/PRs for project validity, gate PRs, run gator, validate submissions, or monitor PRs toward merge readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the CARLA Leaderboard evaluator over a set of routes with your agent — routes/routes-subset/repetitions/track selection, checkpoint and live-results endpoints, resume after a crash, recording, and the debug levels — for leaderboard 1.0, 2.0 or 2.1. Preflights the whole stack (version pairing, maps, ports, agent class, sensor budget) before spending hours, and hands the world back in async mode. Use when the user asks to "run the leaderboard", "evaluate my agent", "run routes_training", "resume an evaluation", or "reproduce my submission locally".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. For systems venues (OSDI, NSDI, ASPLOS, SOSP), use systems-paper-writing instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarifies that file creation tasks are complete when the deliverable is successfully written—no submission step required

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve academic paper writing quality for ML/CV/NLP-style papers with clear section structure, paragraph flow, and reviewer-facing presentation. Use when drafting or revising Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Method, Experiments, or Conclusion; polishing figures/tables; checking claim-support alignment; or performing self-review before submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to set up, scale, validate, or harden NVIDIA physical AI infrastructure for synthetic data generation workflows across local MicroK8s or Azure AKS, including Kubernetes clusters, inference endpoint deployment, OSMO deployment, workload submission readiness, and infrastructure failure recovery. Trigger keywords: physical ai infrastructure, resilient scaling, SDG infrastructure, microk8s, azure aks, NVCF deployment, NIM Operator, OSMO deploy, workflow scaling. Don't trigger for: OSMO log summarization or workload-only operations unless infrastructure setup, scaling, validation, or recovery is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with Kleros Curate registries across Ethereum Mainnet, Gnosis Chain, and Sepolia. Use when the user mentions Curate, Light Curate/LightGeneralizedTCR/LGTCR, Stake Curate/PermanentGTCR/PGTCR, Scout, token-curated registry/TCR, token lists, address/CDN tags, Goldsky, MetaEvidence, Verify Your List, or Curate calls such as addItem, removeItem, challengeItem, challengeRequest, and fundAppeal. Covers registry discovery and queries; policy/schema inspection; submissions, removals, challenges, evidence, appeals, rewards, execution; factory deployment; and frontend verification on all three networks. Also trigger for registry/list operations paired with Kleros, arbitrator, dispute, juror, or PNK context, and whenever the user names or tests kleros-curate. Do NOT use for non-Kleros registries or generic IPFS uploads without Curate context; route standalone uploads to kleros-ipfs-upload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates 3-4 strategic talk angles with strength/weakness analysis, title options, CFP descriptions, and a peer feedback draft, then enforces a mandatory CHECKPOINT for user confirmation before scripting. Use when deciding how to frame a talk, preparing a CFP submission, or choosing between multiple narrative angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walmart product reviews scraper: given a walmart.com product item ID, navigate to the reviews page and extract paginated customer reviews including reviewId, rating, title, review text, author nickname, submission date, verified purchase status, helpful votes, variant selected (color/size), badges, fulfilled by, seller name, and photo count. Use when user mentions walmart reviews, walmart product reviews, walmart customer reviews, scrape walmart reviews, extract walmart reviews, walmart review scraper, walmart ratings and reviews, walmart review data, walmart review text, walmart review pagination, get reviews from walmart, walmart review collector, walmart verified purchase reviews, walmart review analysis, walmart sentiment analysis, walmart review export, walmart buyer feedback. Also applies to bulk collection of walmart product reviews across multiple items, sentiment analysis on walmart reviews for market research, competitor product review benchmarking on walmart, and monitoring new walmart reviews over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amazon Alexa for Shopping Q&A automation: submits questions to Amazon's Alexa/Rufus AI shopping assistant and collects response text; supports optional keyword search context (navigate to search results page before asking for category-specific answers). Use when user mentions Amazon Alexa, Rufus, Amazon shopping assistant, Amazon AI chat, ask Amazon, Amazon Q&A, automate Alexa questions, Rufus chatbot, Amazon assistant automation, collect Alexa responses, bulk question submission to Amazon, keyword search context, category research. Also applies to extracting Amazon product recommendations from conversational AI, automating repeated queries to Amazon's AI shopping feature, collecting Alexa shopping responses at scale, or market research within a specific product category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formik form handling with validation patterns. Use when building forms, implementing validation, or handling form submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, conducting literature reviews, finding related work, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, citation verification workflows, and paper discovery/evaluation criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", "audit claims", "check overclaiming", "verify whether results support claims", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare, audit, or revise Nature-ready Data Availability statements, data repository plans, dataset citations, and FAIR metadata checklists for manuscripts. Use when the user asks about Nature data availability, research data sharing, repository selection, accession numbers, restricted or sensitive data, source data, supplementary datasets, DataCite-style dataset references, FAIR metadata for academic publication, or Chinese-to-English data availability wording for Chinese-speaking authors preparing Nature-family submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize messy conference LaTeX template .zip files into clean Overleaf-ready structure. Use when the user asks to "organize LaTeX template", "clean up .zip template", or "prepare Overleaf submission template".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before direct filesync calls, reading non-task shared files, pushing mid-task progress, or troubleshooting missing shared files. Do not use for normal task acceptance or submission; taskflow ack_task and submit_task handle lifecycle sync internally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build forms, validate data, and react to user input in Blazor. USE FOR adding forms, search boxes, filter panels, inline editing, data-entry UI, file uploads, validation (annotations or custom), handling form submissions, and binding input controls. Covers EditForm, built-in input components, DataAnnotationsValidator, custom validation, SSR form patterns (SupplyParameterFromForm, FormName, AntiforgeryToken, Enhance), and @bind for simple interactive controls. DO NOT USE for project scaffolding (see create-blazor-project) or prerendering issues (see support-prerendering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。