「vue」の検索結果

Use when a skill fails for a missing tool or the environment needs checking. Diagnoses Python, R, Node, Claude Code, Git, Zotero and configured MCP servers and prints a pass/fail table with links to the setup docs. Read-only; installs nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting a medical research manuscript or any IMRAD section. Runs an 8-phase pipeline from outline to submission-ready draft for original articles, AI validation studies, case reports, meta-analyses, technical notes and more. Checking a draft is /self-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when checking your own manuscript before submission from a reviewer's perspective. Returns anticipated Major/Minor comments with fixes, including numerical, citation and leakage checks, with an optional multi-reviewer panel. Someone else's paper is /peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting an IRB or ethics research protocol. Writes Background, Study Design, Sample Size and Statistical Plan in full prose and leaves institution-specific sections as TODO skeletons. Filling an institutional Word form is /fill-protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when applying a published cohort study's methodology to a different database. Extracts the design from the source paper, maps variables to the target database with a harmonization table, generates the analysis code and reports every forced deviation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, auditing or freezing a journal submission package from the canonical manuscript. Detects drift between the source and the per-journal submission copy, builds byte-preserving packages with manifests, and records current, stale or frozen status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when finding papers or building a reference list. Searches PubMed, Semantic Scholar and bioRxiv/medRxiv, includes only references verified through an API, and generates BibTeX. Auditing an existing reference list is /verify-refs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a manuscript comes back with reviewer or editor comments. Numbers every comment, classifies it MAJOR/MINOR/REBUTTAL, drafts a point-by-point response with tracked manuscript changes, routes new analyses to /analyze-stats and writes the cover letter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool. Covers 49 reporting guidelines and risk-of-bias tools (STROBE, CONSORT, STARD, TRIPOD+AI, PRISMA, QUADAS and more), marking each item PRESENT, PARTIAL or MISSING. Not a reviewer critique (/self-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a clinical CSV/Excel dataset needs profiling and cleaning before analysis (missing values, outliers, duplicates, type mismatches). Profiles, flags and generates cleaning code in three stages, each gated on the researcher's approval. Never auto-cleans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a manuscript needs a copy-edit for consistency and non-native English clarity. Flags abbreviation, US/UK spelling, en-dash range, P/p, hyphenation, number-style and unit-spacing issues, then polishes style only. AI-tell removal is /humanize.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Renamed to /imaging-data in v6 (removed in v7).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing an academic talk such as a journal club, grand rounds, seminar, conference presentation, or lecture/teaching deck. Analyzes the source, drafts audience-adapted speaker scripts, builds or augments the PPTX with speaker notes and prepares Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when rendering a Markdown document (English or Korean) such as a proposal, IRB cover letter, handout or reference table to PDF via pandoc and xelatex, with auto-fitted table widths and CJK fonts. Not for manuscripts with a bibliography (/manage-refs) or Word forms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Renamed to /imaging-data in v6 (removed in v7).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning a personal agent skill into an open-source, distributable one. Runs a PII audit, generalizes personal details, checks licence compatibility, reviews cross-platform adapters and walks through packaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification). Walks a decision tree to the right test and returns reproducible R/Python code and IRB-ready justification text. Analyzing collected data is /analyze-stats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when one validated cohort analysis must be repeated across many exposure/outcome pairs. Generates one R/Python script per combination from a single methodology template, changing only the variables, and aggregates the results into a summary matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when sending local changes back to the project (an added journal profile, a fixed checklist item, an adapted skill) or reporting a false positive or bug. Finds what changed, scans it for patient data, shows every line and sends nothing until you confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS). Harmonizes variables, runs parallel weighted analyses and builds comparison tables for 2-country (KR+US) or 3-country (KR+US+CN) designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when exposure, outcome, covariate or eligibility definitions and cutoffs need a citable basis before the protocol. Reads the data dictionary first, then maps each variable to a guideline or published definition and the database columns in a citation-backed table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing a researcher's publication record from PubMed. Fetches an author's papers, classifies study types and author position, charts the patterns and writes a strategy report, with an optional trajectory-archetype classification. Works from PubMed metadata only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when clinical data may contain PHI and must be de-identified before any LLM-assisted analysis. A local Python script (no network or AI calls) detects identifiers with regex and heuristics in 11 country locale packs, with interactive terminal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a study that benchmarks AI systems against a human-expert panel, before data collection. Plans the arms, decoupled rubrics with anchors, planted calibration probes, reviewer panel, inter-rater reliability targets and LLM-as-judge versus human adjudication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。