「vulnerabilities」の検索結果

Smart contract vulnerability playbook. Use when auditing Solidity/EVM contracts for reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, delegatecall, flash loan, signature replay, and MEV-related attack patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser and V8 exploitation playbook. Use when exploiting JavaScript engine vulnerabilities including JIT type confusion, incorrect bounds elimination, and V8 sandbox bypass to achieve renderer RCE and sandbox escape in Chrome/Chromium.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DeFi attack pattern playbook. Use when analyzing flash loan attacks, price oracle manipulation, MEV sandwich attacks, governance exploits, bridge vulnerabilities, and token standard edge cases in decentralized finance protocols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability playbook. Use when reasoning about workflows, race conditions, price manipulation, coupon abuse, state machines, and multi-step authorization gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android pentesting playbook. Use when testing Android applications for SSL pinning bypass, exported component abuse, WebView vulnerabilities, intent redirection, root detection bypass, tapjacking, and backup extraction during authorized mobile security assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Heap exploitation playbook. Use when targeting ptmalloc2/glibc heap vulnerabilities including UAF, double free, overflow, off-by-one/null, and leveraging tcache/fastbin/unsortedbin attacks for arbitrary write or code execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Container escape playbook. Use when operating inside a Docker container, LXC, or Kubernetes pod and need to escape to the host via privileged mode, capabilities, Docker socket, cgroup abuse, namespace tricks, or runtime vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build robust backend systems with modern technologies (Node.js, Python, Go, Rust), frameworks (NestJS, FastAPI, Django), databases (PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis), APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), testing strategies, security best practices (OWASP Top 10), performance optimization, scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), DevOps practices (Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD), and monitoring. Use when designing APIs, implementing authentication, optimizing database queries, setting up CI/CD pipelines, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build safe, local, defensive reproductions of ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities (CVEs, vendor advisories, AI-agent incidents) for whitepapers, control testing, and education. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, or write up a known vulnerability or security incident — phrases like "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "demonstrate the EchoLeak/Cursor/postmark-mcp issue", "show how this exploit worked", "add a reproducibility guide", or "pull the NVD/CVE details for". It fetches advisory metadata from NVD and CVE.org, confirms the issue is fixed, and produces a vulnerable-vs-patched harness that is offline, loopback-only, and uses synthetic markers. It NEVER discovers, develops, or weaponizes new zero-days and refuses any unpatched or live-target request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Trivy vulnerability scanner in offline mode to discover security vulnerabilities in dependency files. This skill covers setting up offline scanning, executing Trivy against package lock files, and generating JSON vulnerability reports without requiring internet access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest SSH services", "enumerate SSH configurations", "brute force SSH credentials", "exploit SSH vulnerabilities", "perform SSH tunneling", or "audit SSH security". It provides comprehensive SSH penetration testing methodologies and techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common vulnerabilities and implement secure Solidity patterns. Use when writing smart contracts, auditing existing contracts, or implementing security measures for blockchain applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a security expert specializing in dependency vulnerability analysis, SBOM generation, and supply chain security. Scan project dependencies across ecosystems to identify vulnerabilities, assess risks, and recommend remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a dependency security expert specializing in vulnerability scanning, license compliance, and supply chain security. Analyze project dependencies for known vulnerabilities, licensing issues, outdated packages, and provide actionable remediation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a dependency security expert specializing in vulnerability scanning, license compliance, and supply chain security. Analyze project dependencies for known vulnerabilities, licensing issues, outdated packages, and provide actionable remediation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Review code, skills, and prompts for security vulnerabilities — OWASP Top 10, prompt injection, business logic flaws, and insecure defaults. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing modules, reviewing AI skills/prompts, or preparing for release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find outbound call sites), batched verify (trace user input to destinations in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/ssrf-results.md. Use when asked to find SSRF or server-side request forgery bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find dangerous execution sinks), batched verify (trace user input to sinks in parallel subagents, 3 sinks each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers OS command injection, eval-like sinks, and unsafe deserialization. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/rce-results.md. Use when asked to find RCE, command injection, or unsafe deserialization bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations, race conditions, reward abuse, etc. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/businesslogic-results.md. Use when asked to find business logic, logic flaws, or abuse-of-function bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect insecure file upload vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: discovery (find all upload sites), batched verify (check extension bypass and related issues in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/fileupload-results.md. Use when asked to find file upload, unrestricted upload, or extension bypass bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。