4,569 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Triage inbound journalist source queries and draft a response only when the user's expertise is a real fit. Runs each query through proven source-request lenses (4-gate fit triage, credential-standing test, deadline read, BLUF/inverted-pyramid drafting), kills weak fits, asks for missing proof, and never auto-sends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Attribute GPU time in one sglang-omni stage to specific lines of `sglang_omni/` python source. Drives the `llm-torch-profiler-analysis` backend with a mapping/formal trace pair plus steady-state gates, and carries the rules for reading its three tables on an omni stage. Use when a stage is slower than expected and the question is which python code is the bottleneck, not which kernel is hot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a bounded task plan (and the agent prompt for it) that runs the 5-layer profiling methodology in .claude/skills/model-profiling/METHODOLOGY.md against one model, stops for human confirmation before any GPU work starts, then delegates the actual run to a background agent, verifies its completion claim, and routes findings into a gitignored .profiling-runs/<model>/ directory — durably tracked as a sub-issue under the tracking issue named in SKILL.md's "Result tracking" section — plus the methodology doc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release", "cut a release", "ship a new version", or "bump and publish" brooks-lint. Do NOT trigger for: propagating an already-decided version without releasing (use `npm run bump` directly), CHANGELOG edits alone, or questions about the release process that don't ask to perform it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1:1 rebuild of award-winning creative websites (WebGL / scroll-animation / portfolio sites). Evidence-driven pipeline - mirror-first forensics, line-number-traceable reverse engineering of minified bundles, verbatim porting, quantitative verification gates. Use when user asks to "复刻网站", "重建网站", "1:1 rebuild", "clone this site", or provides a URL of a creative/award site to reproduce.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent 2 of the video editing pipeline. Finds and removes spoken mistakes — stutters, repeated words, false starts, and retakes (re-recorded lines) — from a talking-head recording. Use after cut-silences, when asked to cut mistakes, remove stutters / repeats / filler restarts, clean up flubs, or keep the best take. Works review-gated: it proposes every cut with context and a reason for approval, then renders only the approved cuts via ffmpeg. Requires a word-level transcript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Beginner-friendly end-to-end video creator for HyperFrames. Use when the user says "make a video", "create a video", "new video", "build a video", "video from scratch", "I want to make a video", "help me create a video", or when someone who's never used HyperFrames before arrives with a concept, script, or rough idea and wants a finished MP4. Interviews the user in one pass, then builds the full video with mandatory preview and visual-verification gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build the visual layer of a long-form talking-head video as one persistent world the camera moves through, instead of a sequence of separate graphics. Use when asked to edit a video, add motion graphics, design the visuals for a script, plan an edit, or fix an edit judged confusing, text-heavy, hard to follow, or "clearly made by an AI". Covers the persistent world, camera grammar, the spotlight rule, spatial open loops, ornament and token discipline, transcript timing, and the verification gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only evo run reporting. Use when the user invokes /evo:report, asks what happened overnight, asks what improved recently, asks for the best/frontier candidates, asks for a quick score chart without opening the dashboard, or wants the scatter plot in chat output. Never run benchmarks, gates, Slurm commands, evo run, or ad-hoc verification scripts for report requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when picking or diagnosing a training move (SFT, LoRA, DPO/KTO/ORPO, RFT, GRPO/PPO/RLOO, RLHF), or when the user mentions fine-tuning, post-training, training recipe, reward design, or weight updates. Decision tree by reward shape, smoke-run gate, three failure diagnostics, five false-progress patterns. Provider recipes and I/O contract in references/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes, tests, registers and debugs Claude Code hooks (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, SessionStart, Stop) that turn a rule the model keeps breaking into a hard gate. Use when the user wants to block or intercept a tool call, add a guard rail, fix a misfiring hook, or says 拦截 / 守卫 / 钩子 — including "make it stop doing X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gated checklist to choose or review a library, framework, storage, data format, model, build-vs-buy or architecture. Run favorites-search before external research when installed. Compare candidates and trade-offs; select within authorization or return user-owned choices. Use for 用哪个 / 选什么框架 / 要不要自建 / A 还是 B / 这个方案行不行 and before committing to one. Research reports → deep-research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate and resolve Cloudflare configuration issues using API-driven evidence gathering. Use when troubleshooting ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS, SSL errors, DNS issues, or any Cloudflare-related problems. Focus on systematic investigation using Cloudflare API to examine actual configuration rather than making assumptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigates network, streaming and protocol failures with falsification-first layered experiments, the general fallback for unknown root causes. Use for ECONNRESET / RST_STREAM / SSE stalls, CDN/CGNAT timeouts or certificate errors, throughput collapse where everything returns 200 but transfers crawl, or LAN identity/topology mysteries. Not for known Tailscale/TUN/DNS/proxy-path conflicts (use tunnel-doctor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits, diffs, copies, and lists providers/models, adds models, and switches the default model in local openclaw.json configs; diagnoses gateway/plugin failures (down, parked, broken, or out of date after an upgrade). Use for 虾/龙虾 config audits. Not for model-error repair (use openclaw-model-switch).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and designs safe Terraform releases, provisioners (remote-exec/local-exec/file, cloud-init, Compose, Caddy), multi-environment isolation, and fresh-host bootstrap. Use when writing or reviewing plan/apply wrappers or provisioners; when staging/production config may differ; when a rollout can mutate a shared gateway; or debugging drift, TLS, container restarts, DNS duplication, or snapshot contamination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-test a decision or claim through a sharp, fair Q&A — the questions a good lawyer or skeptical friend would ask before you commit. Use when asked to cross-examine me, ask me hard questions about this, interrogate my plan, or make me defend this. Produces a sequenced line of probing questions (from clarifying to challenging to the killer question), space to answer, and a debrief on where your answers were strong, evasive, or exposed a gap — so weaknesses surface in private before they surface in public.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile controlled-substance records and prepare for an inspection — the count against the register, the discrepancy investigation, the documentation an inspector asks for, and the reporting obligations a shortfall triggers. Use when asked to reconcile controlled drugs, prepare for a DEA or controlled-drug inspection, investigate a discrepancy or suspected diversion, or audit the CD register. Produces the reconciliation, the discrepancy investigation record, the inspection-readiness checklist, and the escalation and reporting decision tree. A process framework only; reporting thresholds, timelines and obligations are set by law in your jurisdiction and must be verified there.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn one long video, podcast, or stream transcript into 8-12 short-form clips — each with a hook line, cut timestamps, captions, and a platform note for TikTok/Reels/Shorts — plus an honesty gate that kills clips that misrepresent the source. Use when someone says 'clip this podcast', 'make shorts from my video', 'what's clippable here', or runs a clipping side hustle. Produces a ranked clip sheet ready for an editor or a clipping app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up a repo or project so an AI coding agent works well in it — the CLAUDE.md, the context, the guardrails, and the conventions the agent needs to be useful instead of lost. Use when asked how do I set up CLAUDE.md, configure my repo for Claude Code, my AI agent keeps getting my project wrong, or onboard an AI agent to my codebase. Produces a structured CLAUDE.md/project-context file (architecture, conventions, commands, do-nots), the right level of detail (enough to orient, not a novel), the guardrails that keep the agent safe (what not to touch, how to test), and a maintenance habit so it stays current — turning a repo an agent flails in into one it navigates like a teammate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a structured budget variance analysis from actual vs budget figures. Use when asked to analyse budget variances, explain underspend or overspend, write a variance commentary, or investigate why actuals differ from plan. Produces a categorised variance table with root cause analysis and management commentary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Request a reasonable accommodation at work or in education — frame it around the barrier and the adjustment (not your diagnosis), cite the right process, and navigate the back-and-forth constructively. Use when someone says 'I need a workplace accommodation', 'request reasonable adjustments', 'ADA/Equality Act accommodation', or 'how do I ask for accommodations for my disability/condition'. Produces the request letter, a barriers-and-adjustments map, disclosure guidance, and a plan for the interactive process. Not legal advice — routes to the formal process and to advocacy where needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make an AI agent or automation reliable enough to trust — the tests, checks, and guardrails that catch its failures before they reach anything real. Use when asked how do I test my AI agent, make my automation reliable, my agent works sometimes, or how do I trust an AI workflow in production. Produces a map of where the agent can fail (bad input, hallucination, wrong tool call, edge cases, silent errors), the checks that catch each (validation, evals on real cases, human-in-the-loop gates, monitoring), a right-sized reliability plan scaled to the stakes, and a rollout that earns trust incrementally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。