3,441 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Cloudflare Email Routing for receiving/sending emails via Workers. Use for email workers, forwarding, allowlists, or encountering Email Trigger errors, worker call failures, SPF issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive testing guide for Cloudflare Workers using Vitest and @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers. Use for test setup, binding mocks (D1/KV/R2/DO), integration tests, or encountering test failures, mock errors, coverage issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
7-phase frontend design review with accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA), responsive testing, visual polish. Use for PR reviews, UI audits, or encountering contrast issues, broken layouts, accessibility violations, inconsistent spacing, missing focus states.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloudflare Hyperdrive for Workers-to-database connections with pooling and caching. Use for PostgreSQL/MySQL, Drizzle/Prisma, or encountering pool errors, TLS issues, connection refused.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloudflare Workers performance optimization with CPU, memory, caching, bundle size. Use for slow workers, high latency, cold starts, or encountering CPU limits, memory issues, timeout errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
| Type-safe ORM for Cloudflare D1 databases using Drizzle. Use when: building D1 database schemas, writing type-safe SQL queries, managing migrations with Drizzle Kit, defining table relations, implementing prepared statements, using D1 batch API, or encountering D1_ERROR, transaction errors, foreign key constraint failures, or schema inference issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub repository automation (CI/CD, issue templates, Dependabot, CodeQL). Use for project setup, Actions workflows, security scanning, or encountering YAML syntax, workflow configuration, template structure errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate to Cloudflare Workers from AWS Lambda, Vercel, Express, and Node.js. Use when porting existing applications to the edge, adapting serverless functions, or resolving Node.js API compatibility issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MUI Base UI unstyled React components with Floating UI. Use for accessible components, Radix UI migration, render props API, or encountering positioning, popup, v1.0 rc / pre-GA issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REST API security hardening with authentication, rate limiting, input validation, security headers. Use for production APIs, security audits, defense-in-depth, or encountering vulnerabilities, injection attacks, CORS issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer quick architectural questions, debug mini-issues, explore the codebase, and help improve skills and workflows. Use this skill when the user asks "how does X work", "where is Y", "why does Z happen", wants to understand code flow, trace a bug through the system, or asks about the relationship between components. Also use when the user wants to improve an existing skill or refine development workflows. This is the lightweight, exploratory counterpart to the planner -- use it for questions and small fixes, not multi-file changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a PRD from the client brief and write it as a local markdown file in issues/. Use when the user wants to turn a client request into a structured PRD.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break down full ICLR reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains reviewer summary/presentation/contribution/strength/weakness/question text and the goal is to split weaknesses/questions into granular R-style response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break down full NeurIPS reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains NeurIPS reviewer fields (Summary, Strengths and Weaknesses, Questions, Limitations) and numeric scores (Rating, Confidence, Quality, Clarity, Significance, Originality). Splits questions and limitations into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break down full ICML reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains reviewer summary/presentation/contribution/strength/weakness/question text and the goal is to split weaknesses/questions into granular R-style response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages software projects end-to-end — decomposing work into tasks, tracking progress across sprints, generating status reports, and integrating with tools like Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, and Trello. Use when the user requests project management or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform thorough code reviews on files or pull requests, checking for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations. Use when the user requests code review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working in a repository that uses bd or Beads for durable project task tracking, issue dependencies, blocker management, multi-session handoff, or shared work memory. Trigger when the user asks to find ready work, claim or close tasks, create follow-up work, inspect blockers, recover project context, or choose between local planning and persistent project tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Ecologist judgment. Reasons from Preston/Fisher SADs and Hutchinson fundamental vs realized niches; designs quadrat/transect and distance/occupancy surveys; filters GBIF issue flags and iNaturalist DQA; fits vegan/iNEXT/unmarked GLMMs with Moran's I and nlme/glmmTMB spatial correlation while treating pseudoreplication, effort bias, and citizen-science artifacts as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Dentist-Scientist. Use when a task calls for Dentist-Scientist judgment. Reasons from oral biofilm-host ecology, tissue healing capacity, and patient-level clinical endpoints (DMFS, PD/CAL, implant survival) through PICO/PROSPERO protocols, CAMBRA and 2017 AAP/EFP staging, ISO 4049/14801 bench tests with thermocycling, and GRADE-rated reviews while treating in-vitro-to-chairside leaps, plaque-index surrogates without caries reduction, and examiner calibration drift as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Developmental Biologist. Use when a task calls for Developmental Biologist judgment. Reasons from stage, positional information, gene regulatory networks, and tissue mechanics through morphology-based staging (Carnegie/HH/Theiler/NF/hpf), French-flag morphogen logic, light-sheet 4D imaging, lineage tracing, and ARRIVE/MDAR/REMBI reporting while treating developmental delay, CRISPR F0 mosaicism, morpholino p53 toxicity, and conflated fate-versus-lineage claims as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Biomaterials Scientist. Use when a task calls for Biomaterials Scientist judgment. Reasons from material-biology interfaces, degradation-product toxicity, and mechanical mismatch to host tissue through ISO 10993 biological evaluation plans, ISO 10993-12 extract conditions, GPC/ICP/SEM characterization, and sterilization validation while treating endotoxin contamination, pH shift from acidic degradation, extract-ratio artifacts, and non-final-form test articles as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aggregate a retort run's findings.jsonl into a machine-readable assessment.json summary with severity counts, penalty score, requirement coverage, and top findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。