「iter」の検索結果

Provides agent selection criteria, workflow patterns (TDD, feature addition, code review, refactoring, debugging), quality gates, and python-cli-architect vs stdlib-scripting routing for Python engineering tasks. Activated by python-engineering:orchestrate at Step 1 before any task is routed. Also activates when an orchestrator needs to select the correct Python specialist agent or chain agents across a multi-step Python workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MkDocs documentation project reference covering CLI commands, mkdocs.yml configuration, Material theme setup, and plugin integration. Bundled references include complete CLI parameters, all mkdocs.yml settings with valid values, Material theme customization options, and plugin configs for mkdocstrings, mermaid2, mkdocs-gen-files, mkdocs-literate-nav, and mkdocs-typer2. Use when initializing a MkDocs site, configuring mkdocs.yml, customizing the Material theme, integrating plugins, building static docs from Markdown, or generating API documentation from Python docstrings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start or complete a specific refactoring task from a task file. Use when a sub-agent needs to pick up a refactoring task, update its status, implement acceptance criteria, and run verification steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis criteria, transformation patterns, output format, and validation checklist for refactoring Claude Code agent prompt files. Load this skill when preparing to run the subagent-refactorer agent or when reviewing agent prompt files for structural, model optimization, or instruction quality improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize existing CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md, agent definitions, and other AI-facing files for Claude comprehension and economy. Scope: optimization of existing content only — not upstream sync, not read-only auditing. Measures baseline metrics, delegates to the ai-doc-optimizer agent with file-type-specific context, runs independent verification via second agent, measures post-optimization metrics, and presents comprehensive before/after report. Supports iterative mode for large targets. Use when improving prompt effectiveness, reducing token waste, or rewriting instructions for LLM consumption. Invoke with /optimize-claude-md <file-or-directory>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format and score completed plugin assessment findings without starting another assessment workflow. Use when a plugin assessment needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, or marketplace-readiness result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Stage 1 Discovery is complete and design must begin — transforms the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY into an actionable ARTIFACT:PLAN via RT-ICA prerequisite verification. Produces approach, components, success criteria, acceptance tests, and risks. Blocks on missing prerequisites before design proceeds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing a task — reads the task and its orchestrator response from the work ledger, loads task-level skills, and implements against acceptance criteria. A dispatch-owned attempt records divergences and the completion report, then closes; a direct invocation returns its task result and material divergence disposition without runner persistence or closure. Triggers on task execution within the implement-feature loop or when an agent picks up a specific task from a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific validation protocol for verifying fixes work through observation, not assumption. Use when claiming a bug fix, code change, refactoring, or implementation is complete — enforces reproduce-broken-state then define-success-criteria then apply-fix then verify-outcome. Success means observing intended behavior, not absence of errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works backward from the stated goal through its prerequisite chain — what must exist to reach the goal, then what each of those requires, back to the current state — classifying each prerequisite as AVAILABLE, DERIVABLE, or MISSING, and blocking planning until nothing is MISSING. Use before creating plans, delegating to agents, or defining acceptance criteria. Activates on specs, PRDs, tickets, RFCs, architecture designs, and multi-step engineering tasks. Always pass `#N` or an inline goal — invoking with no argument and no inline context returns BLOCKED. Integrates with CoVe-style planning pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when SAM Stage 5 Execution has completed and task results need independent verification against acceptance criteria. Dispatches a separate reviewer agent to fact-check implementation outputs and returns COMPLETE or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings and remediation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate why something happens — confirm the question and success criteria with you, then trace the root cause with an evidence chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation across the check categories defined in its Evaluation Checklist — cross-references, doc completeness, knowledge-explorer layer filters, research entry metadata, integration points, and plan consistency. Produces a structured findings report and optionally applies safe fixes. Use when validating a first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work complete, auditing layer docs or schema, or running --dry-run to preview findings without changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a human needs to review a Deepline Play result and hand feedback, labels, or approval back to the agent for revision, evaluation, comparison, or bounded iteration. Triggers on “put this run in a Sheet,” “review these results,” “read my feedback,” “make this a standing rule,” “never regress on this case,” “compare these runs,” “keep improving,” or “add the revised run to the same spreadsheet.” Skip ordinary Play authoring or execution with no human review loop, generic spreadsheet work, and one-off CSV export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, create, run, monitor, and maintain Vapi Simulations for assistants and squads. Use for turning plain-language requirements into a coverage plan, simulation personalities, scenarios, structured-output success criteria, simulations, suites, extending an existing suite, chat or voice runs, tool mocks, target variables, lifecycle webhooks, regression coverage, launch readiness, CI quality gates, run-result analysis, and simulation API validation errors. Do not use for fixed-turn mock-conversation Evals unless the user is deciding between Evals and Simulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a validated ChatGPT/Codex Plugin needs accurate Plugin Directory fields, discovery metadata, starter prompts, and reviewer-facing listing details grounded in the packaged product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pattern for progressively refining context retrieval to solve the subagent context problem

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Value investing analysis using Graham (NCAV/net-net/defensive-investor) and Buffett (economic moat/ROE/FCF) methodologies. Covers single-stock diagnostics and batch screening for both Graham cigar-butt and Buffett quality-compounder criteria. Runs cross-statement reconciliation before scoring. Data from Longbridge CLI first, MCP fallback, WebSearch only for genuine gaps. Triggers: "格雷厄姆", "巴菲特", "捡烟蒂", "烟蒂股", "NCAV", "净流动资产", "护城河", "价值投资", "安全边际", "深度价值", "撿煙蒂", "煙蒂股", "淨流動資產", "護城河", "安全邊際", "Graham", "Buffett", "cigar butt", "net-net", "NCAV screen", "moat", "value investing", "margin of safety", "deep value", "quality compounder", "價值投資", "深度價值", "防御型投资者", "防禦型投資者"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts a company's tone of voice from its own content and turns it into rules a writer or an AI can follow. Phase 1 analyses 15 to 20 pages for sentence, paragraph, word and structure patterns with frequency counts; after the user reviews it, Phase 2 writes the guidelines: tone attributes with before and after examples, a We are / We are not table, tone by context, vocabulary to use and avoid, and open questions. Triggers: "tone of voice", "brand voice", "voice guidelines", "writing style guide", "extract voice from our website", "TOV". Not for visual identity (use /brand-kit) or messaging (use /messaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Peer-сессия DP.SC.154 где Kimi = писатель, Claude = напарник. Запускается простой фразой. Включает ОРЗ Opening и Closing, turn-loop, эскалации, Decision Gate (зафиксировать vs реализовать → ревью → проверить → задеплоить), отложенную финализацию и верификацию.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。