3,584 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Persistent memory across AI sessions using ChromaDB vector database. Stores and retrieves context from past conversations, decisions, and code. Use when user asks to remember something, search past conversations, recall what was done before, save context for later, or find information from previous sessions. Do NOT use for git history or file-based notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous engineering orchestrator ported from Lauren Tan's pstack (poteto-mode): reads your task, picks one of 23 playbooks (bug fix, feature, refactoring, perf, investigation, prototype, babysit, shipping, autonomous run, orchestrate, and more), routes to bundled procedures (how, why, architect, arena, swarm, interrogate, unslop, technical-writing, show-me-your-work, tdd, and others), and applies 24 engineering principles. Self-contained: no plugin install, no sibling skills required, works with any agent that reads skills.sh-format SKILL.md files. Use whenever a task needs rigor: nontrivial code changes, architecture decisions, debugging, reviews, PRs, long autonomous runs, or "work like poteto", "poteto-mode", "pstack".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate traceability matrix and quality gate decision. Use when the user says "lets create traceability matrix" or "I want to analyze test coverage"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing model,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'pricing strategy,' 'pricing experiments,' 'price anchoring,' 'enterprise pricing,' 'GTM pricing,' 'price setting,' 'value-based pricing,' 'revenue optimization,' or 'pricing psychology.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, packaging strategy, discount frameworks, upsell mechanics, and pricing experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户准备做出一个重大决策（投资/收购/承诺），需要评估下行保护是否充足时。或在估值不确定时决定是否行动。 语言信号："这个价格够不够低"/"万一判断错了怎么办"/"我能承受多少亏损"/"下行空间有多大" 不适用于：日常低风险决策、纯上行分析（不关心下行保护时）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户在做决策时不确定自己是否真的理解某个领域，或准备进入一个看似熟悉但缺乏验证记录的领域时。 语言信号："我觉得我懂这个行业"/"这个看起来很简单"/"别人都在投这个"/"我来研究一下这个新领域" 不适用于：纯信息查询、日常琐事选择、用户已有充分专业知识的领域。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The judgment layer: when AutoCode acts on its own and when it stops and asks, and how it speaks about decisions and money. iLang v5.0: perception sets the 11 dimensions, the frozen reference function f_v5 sets the mode, the user sees one plain line. Runs before every consequential action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured pre-design questioning to surface hidden constraints before any architecture decision is locked in. Forces the architect/auditor/reviewer to enumerate what they DON'T know before proposing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-driven web and open-source research for questions that require multiple sources, factual verification, comparisons, or an adopt/adapt/build decision. Use for substantial research in foreground sessions, the genesis-researcher subagent, and research-profile background sessions. Skip for a single stable fact or a known URL that only needs fetching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides user research and research ops. Use when running interviews, usability tests, surveys, or synthesis to de-risk product decisions; not experiments or review mining.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chooses under uncertainty: value of more data, cost-based thresholds, abstention, when to stop a test and ship, robust choice. Use when deciding, not estimating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes or updates engineering documentation and architecture decision records from repository facts, explicit assumptions, trade-offs, and verification links. Use for README changes, design docs, runbooks, ADRs, migration notes, and contributor documentation. Not for implementation planning alone or for copying external documentation without provenance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounds version-sensitive engineering decisions in authoritative current sources by detecting the installed stack, retrieving official documentation or source, reconciling conflicts, and recording citations and confidence. Use for framework APIs, dependency behavior, standards, compatibility, migrations, or technical recommendations that may have changed. Not for stable project-local logic or broad product discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web design reference for building production-grade interfaces. Covers layout, typography, color, spacing, shadows, animation, accessibility, responsive design, components, performance, and UX psychology. Use when building UI, reviewing design quality, choosing design tokens, or making any visual design decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-model agent orchestration using specialized agents for planning, coding, research, math/science, visual analysis, and adversarial review. Use when tasks are complex enough to benefit from different models' strengths, when you want adversarial review to catch blind spots, or when coordinating multi-step workflows across agent roles. Triggers on complex projects, multi-step tasks, architecture decisions, or when explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided, section-by-section authoring of the master architecture document for the game. Reads all GDDs, the systems index, existing ADRs, and the engine reference library to produce a complete architecture blueprint before any code is written. Engine-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates decisions against the pinned engine version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
System-design thinking before any doc or code: goals/non-goals, back-of-envelope numbers, components and contracts, failure modes, operability, security, trade-offs. Use for "design this system", "architecture for X", "trade-offs for X", "how should we architect", "API design", "data model for", "service boundaries", or before an ADR. Hands off to /ship:write-docs to record the decision. Not implementation planning (/ship:design — that turns a decided design into stories).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update structured docs under docs/ with frontmatter, numbering, lifecycle status, and index regeneration — guides, references, troubleshooting, design docs and ADRs. Use for "write a doc", "document this", "create a guide", "write an ADR", "update the docs". For the system-design thinking itself (architecture, trade-offs, failure modes) use /ship:arch-design first — it hands back here to record the decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brainstorming interactively to deepen ideas via four modes (Expand/Propose/Evaluate/Subtract). Does not write code. Not for decisions (Magi), feature specs (Spark), or one-shot reframing (Flux).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring standalone and cross-team specifications: PRD/SRS/HLD/LLD, staged L0-L4 unified packages, BDD acceptance criteria, and traceability. Use for technical or multi-audience documentation; not implementation or architecture decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converting technical knowledge into durable learning documents and publishable articles. Use for diff-based teaching, decision records, onboarding, note/Zenn/Qiita/dev.to posts, article series, retrospectives, and cross-platform repurposing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。