「implementation」の検索結果

Use this skill to define and validate the requirements for a Salesforce Partner Relationship Management (PRM) implementation: deal registration flows, lead distribution models, partner tier hierarchies, MDF budget tracking, and co-marketing content entitlement. Trigger keywords: partner community requirements, PRM deal registration setup, channel partner portal requirements, lead distribution partner, partner tier management, MDF tracking, co-marketing entitlement. NOT for implementing the partner sharing model — use data/partner-data-access-patterns. NOT for building the portal in Experience Builder — use admin/experience-cloud-site-setup. More trigger keywords: partner portal design worksheet, partner tier licence and role depth, PartnerAccountId blank on opportunity, portal role Executive Manager User, sharing set does not support Lead, enable partner user greyed out, offboard a partner firm, PartnerMarketingBudget PartnerFundRequest PartnerFundClaim, ChannelProgramLevel partner tier, deal registration acceptance step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to select the right Salesforce integration pattern — from point-to-point to event-driven to hub-and-spoke — by applying the official Salesforce two-axis decision framework (integration type × timing) to a business integration scenario. Trigger keywords: integration pattern decision, choose integration approach, Salesforce integration architecture, when to use platform events vs API, integration type selection. NOT for implementation of any specific integration pattern (use domain-specific integration skills), MuleSoft architecture (use architect/mulesoft-anypoint-architecture), or middleware vendor selection. More triggers: integration decision record, Bulk API vs REST for a nightly load, external Id upsert, Named Credential vs Remote Site Setting, platform event vs CDC, who calls whom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up or auditing how compliance documentation is structured, collected, and preserved for regulatory audit in Salesforce FSC — covering KYC data collection workflows, AML screening integration setup, audit trail configuration, and regulatory reporting readiness. Triggers: KYC form setup, AML integration configuration, compliance data collection, audit trail setup, regulatory documentation workflow, Field Audit Trail configuration, Setup Audit Trail, Event Monitoring, Discovery Framework, FSC KYC objects, Identity Document setup, Party Identity Verification. NOT for security implementation, NOT for designing AML/KYC architecture (use architect/aml-kyc-process-architecture), NOT for configuring who can access deal or client data (use admin/compliant-data-sharing-setup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, score, and prioritize Salesforce AI use cases before any implementation begins — opportunity identification, Impact-Effort matrix scoring, feasibility evaluation across Technical/Operational/Data/Risk dimensions, and ROI framing. NOT for the license checks and enablement steps once a use case is approved — use agentforce/agentforce-service-ai-setup or agentforce/agentforce-sales-ai-setup. NOT for making the data model AI-ready — use architect/ai-ready-data-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to determine whether a Salesforce Commerce project should use B2B Commerce (account-gated, BuyerGroup-based, contract pricing) or D2C Commerce (consumer storefront, guest checkout, individual-based). Trigger keywords: B2B vs B2C, commerce platform selection, buyer journey, account-based purchasing, consumer storefront, licensing decision. NOT for implementation mechanics — use admin/b2b-commerce-store-setup or admin/b2c-commerce-store-setup for configuration work. NOT for Salesforce B2C Commerce (SFCC/Business Manager) setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects apps that abuse iOS background execution modes — particularly silent audio used to keep the app alive, location background mode used for non-navigation purposes, and background task implementations that do excessive work — enforcing Guideline 2.5.4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects push notification implementations that violate Guideline 4.5.4 — including requesting push permission at launch, using push for unsolicited marketing, and broken notification handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing a TDD step and wanting a quality check. Reviews test quality after RED, implementation correctness after GREEN, and scenario completeness after REFACTOR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavior-first feature development — use when building new capabilities, continuing feature work, or when work introduces new state or multiple user flows. Discovers desired behavior through examples and scenarios before implementation. Do NOT use for bug fixes, typos, or small isolated changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run linters and formatters to fix code style issues. Use when cleaning up style violations, formatting code, or after implementation to ensure code meets project standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a completed implementation against the plan in .unikit/code/plans/. Checks that every task was implemented, nothing was forgotten, the code compiles, the recorded test run still matches the code, and {{engine_name}} conventions are followed. Use after /unikit-implement completes, or when the user says "verify", "check the work", "did we miss anything". For code review use /unikit-review instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute the tasks from an already-created feature plan in .unikit/code/plans/ — read the plan manifest (the PLAN.md file in the plan folder), work through the uncompleted tasks in order, write the code, mark progress, and resume across sessions. Supports selective runs by phase or by task numbers, and continuing from where the last session stopped. Use whenever a plan exists and the user wants to build it, e.g. "implement", "implement the plan", "start coding", "execute the plan", "run the plan", "do the next task", "implement phase 3", "implement tasks 2.1 and 2.3", "continue implementation", "continue where we left off", "keep going on the feature". To create the plan first, use the planning skill — this one carries an existing plan out.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /unikit-plan or to improve a /unikit-fix plan, or when the user says "improve the plan", "what's wrong with the plan", or "update the plan from research". Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an implementation plan for a feature — a dependency-ordered, actionable task list for the project. Has four modes: fast (a quick single-pass plan), full (a richer plan that can also create a git branch), ultra (a multi-file bundle — a manifest plus one deeply specified file per phase — for execution by a smaller model), and add (extend an existing plan with more tasks). Pick the mode from the user's wording: "full plan" runs full; "quick plan" or "fast plan" runs fast; "ultra plan", "ultraplan" or "ultra-plan" runs ultra; a plain "create a plan" with no qualifier defaults to fast; "add to the plan" or "extend the plan" runs add. Use whenever the user wants to plan a feature or task, e.g. "create a plan", "create a full plan", "create a quick plan", "run an ultra plan for the inventory system", "plan this feature", "add this to the plan", "extend the plan", "add a phase to the plan". Ultra runs only when the user names it — never because the feature looks large.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan or review software architecture through a small expert panel. Use when the user explicitly asks for architecture planning, system design, technical strategy, an architecture assessment, a design review, or a system health review. Do not use for ordinary PR review, debugging, or implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "build a feature", "fix a bug", "implement something", "start a dev cycle", types "/dev", or describes a software task that requires design, implementation, testing, and shipping. Orchestrates the full software development lifecycle from interrogation through shipping, with self-learning that improves over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。