「scope」の検索結果

Compatibility skill for competitor alternatives. Use when a user or upstream workflow invokes this name; route the task to `competitors` while preserving the requested scope and source-specific intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure requirement docs define scope, terminology, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and non-functional requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure architecture diagrams are readable, consistent with text, and clear on scope, boundaries, and data flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs come up. Choose user delight over implementation convenience; ship fewer polished features over more rough ones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers between question and answer, and hidden state in the reader's head; collapse one-caller wrappers and shrink mutable scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent must decide whether to proceed autonomously, ask for clarification, request approval, or select an appropriate verification scope for a coding or documentation task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements Riverpod (v3.3.x) compile-safe state management for Flutter apps. Use when implementing @riverpod code generation providers, handling AsyncValue loading/error/data states, using ref.watch/ref.read/ref.listen, setting up ProviderScope, writing Notifier/AsyncNotifier classes, using FutureProvider/StreamProvider, applying autoDispose and family modifiers, combining providers, testing providers in isolation, scoping rebuilds with Consumer instead of ConsumerWidget, using ref.watch with select() for field-level precision, migrating from StateNotifierProvider or Riverpod 2.x patterns, handling Notifier resource lifecycle with ref.onDispose, or using experimental Mutation and offline persistence APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for babysitting one explicitly authorized pull or merge request. Use to monitor its live review state and checks, fix actionable in-scope findings, and apply separate reply, approval, merge, and soak gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Upsy for secure access to third-party accounts and tasks involving memory, files, connected email, calendar, documents, messaging, project apps, and the cloud browser. Guide account connections, scoped permissions, and activity auditing, even when the user has not mentioned Upsy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shape FriendlyBet product decisions, MVP scope, user stories, tournament flows, multi-sport expansion, pool mechanics, social competition loops, and feature prioritization. Use when planning what FriendlyBet should build, cut, sequence, or validate, especially for new sports, prediction formats, pool flows, leaderboards, sharing, or product strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine ambiguity audit scope, enumerate source documents from filesystem, and persist rubric file bindings

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduce genuinely new scope into the pipeline by classifying change type and cascading updates through downstream layers

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose validated idea-brief.md into 4–8 per-feature PRDs with screens nested. Use after kta-idea-pipeline. Triggers — write PRD, decompose features, feature breakdown, screen list, MVP scope to PRD, post-idea-validation, per-feature PRD, product requirements document, generate PRDs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap a new Gradle module in any Kotlin Android project. Walks the user through choosing one of three module types — library module (`com.android.library`), feature module (regular Android library that hosts a feature/UI, install-time only), or dynamic feature module (`com.android.dynamic-feature`, on-demand/conditional/instant delivery). Use whenever the user wants to add a module, modularize code, extract a util/data/ui layer, create a new feature, set up Play Feature Delivery, or asks "should this be a library or feature module?". Discovers the project's existing conventions (plugin aliases, namespaces, sibling modules, version catalog) instead of hardcoding any. Pushes back on bad combos (e.g. utility code in a dynamic feature). Stops at scaffolding; app-level wiring is out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior Kotlin specialist code review — framework-agnostic. Use whenever the user asks to review, audit, critique, or get feedback on Kotlin code, a file, a class, a function, a module, a diff, a branch, a commit, or a pull request. Judges Kotlin language idioms, logic correctness, architecture and layering, concurrency (coroutines, Flow, structured concurrency, cancellation, race conditions), null safety, exception safety, testability, performance, and security. Detects force-unwraps, unchecked casts, GlobalScope, leaked mutability, broken structured concurrency, hidden side effects, weak abstractions, untestable seams, allocation hot spots, weak crypto, input-validation gaps, and PII logging. Outputs prioritized findings with file:line anchors and minimal-diff fixes. No assumptions about DI framework, UI framework, or build system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify an open factory PR before human review - re-runs gates, checks the test proves the fix, checks scope and test tampering. Use when reviewing a factory PR, running the PR review routine, or asked to independently check a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently verify a factory pull request, including fail-closed gates, negative test proof, scope, and load-bearing review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a ready-to-spec queue item into an approved plan through explicit human gates. Use when an item needs scope decided before code exists, when planning a feature, or before starting a migration. Runs interactively - not for unattended routines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClaw API gateway proxy for authenticated SaaS calls (100+ services in references/SERVICES.md). Use ONLY when making an HTTP request to a third-party service that requires the gateway's stored credentials. NOT for direct API calls with bearer tokens already in scope, NOT for monday.com (use monday-for-agents), NOT for WhatsApp (use heleni-whatsapp). Triggers: "call the X API", "fetch from <service>", "send to Slack via gateway", "use the gateway for".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Chamber — chamber secrets management using AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store, service-scoped secret organization, environment variable export, and parameter auditing. Covers reading and writing secrets by service, comparing environments, listing services, version tracking, and IAM permission validation. Use when managing AWS SSM-based secrets with Chamber, auditing parameter changes, or comparing configs across services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Netlify projects via netlify.toml and the _headers/_redirects files — covering build settings and deploy contexts alongside environment variables/scopes and the Secrets Controller plus redirect/rewrite/proxy and custom-header rules. Use when setting a build command or publish directory, adding redirect or rewrite or proxy rules, configuring custom headers or basic auth, setting or scoping environment variables and secrets, wiring up a monorepo or SPA fallback, or skipping unnecessary builds. Reach for this whenever you touch netlify.toml or ask "why is my env var undefined in a function" or "how do I redirect this path".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope the real change surface before editing. Use when planning a feature, bugfix, refactor, or review and you need a concrete map of likely touch points, dependencies, tests, and nearby risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en bug bounty (HackerOne, Bugcrowd, scope, PII, CVSS scoring, responsible disclosure)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。