「search skill」の検索結果

Diverga Memory System v7.0 - Context-persistent research support with checkpoint auto-trigger and cross-session continuity. Triggers: memory, remember, context, recall, checkpoint, decision, persist, 기억, 맥락, 세션, 체크포인트

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent D4 - Measurement Instrument Developer - Scale construction and psychometric validation. Covers item development, validity evidence, and reliability testing for social science research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent C3 - Mixed Methods Design Consultant Comprehensive mixed methods research design specialist covering sequential, concurrent, embedded, and multiphase designs with Morse notation. Core Capabilities: - Sequential Explanatory (QUAN → qual): Explain quantitative results - Sequential Exploratory (QUAL → quan): Develop instruments - Convergent Parallel (QUAN + QUAL): Comprehensive understanding - Embedded (QUAN(qual)): Secondary strand addresses different question - Multiphase: Long-term projects with iterative phases - Morse notation interpretation and recommendation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a hook", "add a PreToolUse/PostToolUse/Stop hook", "validate tool use", "implement prompt-based hooks", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "set up event-driven automation", "block dangerous commands", or mentions hook events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SubagentStop, SessionStart, SessionEnd, UserPromptSubmit, PreCompact, Notification). Provides comprehensive guidance for creating and implementing Claude Code plugin hooks with focus on advanced prompt-based hooks API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diverga Dashboard - Live configuration status and feature overview. 24 specialized agents across 9 categories for social science research. VS methodology prevents mode collapse. Human checkpoints enforce human-in-the-loop decisions. Triggers: /diverga, diverga dashboard, diverga status

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create git commit", "manage branches", "follow git workflow", "use Conventional Commits", "handle merge conflicts", or asks about git branching strategies, version control best practices, pull request workflows. Provides comprehensive Git workflow guidance for team collaboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "learn from Kaggle", "study Kaggle solutions", "analyze Kaggle competitions", or mentions Kaggle competition URLs. Provides access to extracted knowledge from winning Kaggle solutions across NLP, CV, time series, tabular, and multimodal domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "debug this", "fix this error", "investigate this bug", "troubleshoot this issue", "find the problem", "something is broken", "this isn't working", "why is this failing", or reports errors/exceptions/bugs. Provides systematic debugging workflow and common error patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to review a diff or pull request, write review comments, audit code quality, establish review standards, or improve how a team performs code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Quantitative Design Consultant with Materials & Sampling Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids obvious experimental designs, proposes context-optimal quantitative strategies Absorbed C4 (Experimental Materials Developer) and D1 (Sampling Strategy Advisor) capabilities Use when: selecting quantitative research design, planning experimental/survey methodology, power analysis, developing materials, sampling Triggers: RCT, quasi-experimental, experimental design, survey design, power analysis, sample size, factorial design, materials, stimuli, sampling strategy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep consistency audit of the entire repository — launches 4 parallel specialist agents to find factual errors, code bugs, broken references, count mismatches, and cross-document inconsistencies, then fixes all issues and loops until clean. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants a comprehensive repository-wide check — not a targeted review of a single file. Triggers include: "audit", "deep audit", "find inconsistencies", "check everything", "run a full audit", "are there any broken references", "check the whole repo", "something feels off", "run the audit loop", or after making broad changes across multiple files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute research implementation plans efficiently while maintaining estimation quality and finishing features

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run multi-agent econometric review on estimation code, identification arguments, and research artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document a recently solved research problem to compound methodological knowledge

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full autonomous research workflow — brainstorm, plan, implement, review, and document

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full autonomous research workflow using swarm mode for parallel execution

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers academic journal submission, referee responses, and revision management. Use when the user is preparing a manuscript for submission, formatting for a specific journal, responding to referees, or managing revisions. Triggers on "submit", "referee", "revision", "R&R", "response letter", "journal", "formatting", "submission", "resubmit", "cover letter", "referee report", "revise and resubmit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform research descriptions into well-structured implementation plans following project conventions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants substantive academic feedback on a paper — not just surface edits. Triggers include: "review my paper", "give me feedback on this draft", "what would a referee say", "anticipate referee objections", "act as a referee", "check my identification strategy", "is my argument convincing", "review this manuscript", "critique my paper", "will this pass review", or any request for deep critique of academic writing beyond typos and grammar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。