2.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implement AI chatbot analytics and conversation monitoring. Use when adding conversation metrics, tracking AI usage, measuring user engagement with chat, or building conversation dashboards. Activates for AI analytics, token tracking, conversation categorization, and chat performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cooperative vibe coding across machines — real-time collaborative development with humans and AI agents. Covers current tools (Live Share, Code With Me, Zed, Cursor multiplayer, tmux), git-based async patterns, AI agent coordination, and the aspirational future of multi-human multi-agent development. Activate on: "pair programming", "vibe coding together", "collaborative coding", "mob programming", "remote pairing", "code together", "multiplayer coding", "Live Share", "Code With Me", "ensemble programming", "cooperative development". NOT for: building a real-time collaboration ENGINE (use real-time-collaboration-engine), git workflow mechanics (use git-best-practices), single-user AI coding assistance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Conway's homomorphism principle to multi-agent system design, recognizing that agent coordination structure predetermines system architecture and capability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates comprehensive, context-aware code review checklists tailored to the specific codebase, programming language, and team standards. Analyzes PR diffs and suggests what reviewers should focus on.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model an organization with BDI-inspired perceptions, expressed goals, accommodations, and levels of agency. Use for socio-technical diagnosis where actors interpret the same situation differently and agreement is partial. NOT for individual AgentSpeak execution, normative conflict algorithms, or ordinary workflow diagrams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for bounded reasoning, partial planning, commitment policy, deliberation cost, and reconsideration-threshold design instead of assuming free deliberation. NOT for exhaustive planning, static optimization, or domains where reconsideration cost is irrelevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design polished terminal UX for CLIs and TUIs. Use for setup flows, dashboards, tables, and actionable errors. NOT for web UIs, desktop windows, API schemas, or shell automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an agent's handling of obligations, prohibitions, permissions, and conflicts among norms and goals. Use when an autonomous agent must decide which norms apply and what to do when they conflict. NOT for simple fixed policy checks, ordinary BDI commitment design, or organizational metaphor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choosing and operating an HTTP API versioning strategy that doesn't break clients — Stripe's date-based pinned versions, the Deprecation/Sunset header pair (RFC 9745 + RFC 8594), URI vs header vs media-type approaches, and the version-transformer pattern. Grounded in Stripe's published architecture and IETF RFCs. NOT for GraphQL schema evolution, gRPC/Protobuf wire compatibility, database schema migrations, or library/SDK semver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement an executable BDI agent cycle with events, context-guarded plans, intention stacks, selection functions, and belief revision. Use when designing or debugging AgentSpeak-style runtimes or concrete BDI program semantics. NOT for high-level BDI adoption, organizational modeling, norms, or hypertree team planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Compares the version-pinned A2A, MCP, and JSON-RPC role boundaries covered by this bundle; OpenAI and LangChain-specific APIs require their own current sources. Teaches when to use rigid schemas versus free-form content with validation, typed versus untyped boundaries, and streaming versus batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use jury_rig-architect), specific tool implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safety-case design for always-on agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy and security risk surfaces, cost controls, scope, user dependency concerns, retention, incident containment, and responsible deployment evidence. It identifies hazards and asks for named controls, tests, owners, and residual uncertainty; it does not provide legal, clinical, youth-safety, or jurisdictional determinations. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design RL simulation sandboxes, trajectory datasets, QLoRA/LoRA adaptation plans, eval harnesses, and rollback unhooks for agents learning specific coding behaviors beyond the base model. Use when building or reviewing tool-use training loops, offline trajectories, reward functions, self-improvement harnesses, or Port Daddy agent behavior curricula. NOT for generic ML tutorials, full model training operations, or production deployment without eval gates and safety unhooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a pull request an AI coding agent can actually get merged: a scoped, coherent diff; a Summary and Test Plan backed by real evidence; correct triage of required-and-blocking CI gates versus external/advisory checks (e.g. a Cloudflare Pages preview build); draft-while-WIP discipline; named fixup commits for real review findings; and a clean landing through a merge queue without force-pushing or bypassing branch protection. Use when opening, updating, triaging red CI on, or landing an agent-authored GitHub PR. NOT for this repo's internal release ceremony, actor embodiments, or contributor mirror-sync mechanics (use port-daddy-internal-dev), tracking backlog/issue lifecycle across a board (use agent-issue-tracker-workflow), or deciding what to build next / sequencing a roadmap (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and verifies fail-closed continuation of a living durable agent after its VM, process, provider session, backend, or context window disappears. Use for body leases, generation fencing, cold-birth failure, process GC, native resume, cross-harness rebodiment, resurrection capsules, capability translation, ambiguous-effect reconciliation, and capacity-aware handoff. NOT for reviving an intentionally retired identity, generic disaster recovery, copying credentials or raw transcripts, ordinary process restart, or claiming metaphysical continuity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end Coval accent testing workflow. Creates one persona per accent (each using a distinct accent voice and mirroring your Standard Customer behavior), launches one run per accent against the same voice agent + test set + metrics, polls for completion, builds a per-persona comparison table from the results, and creates the saved multi-run report (grouped by Persona) via the public API. Use when a user wants to follow the Testing Across Accents cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/testing-across-accents) without doing each step by hand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure an AI agent to send OpenTelemetry traces to Coval. Use when a user wants to add Coval tracing, instrument an agent for simulations or conversation monitoring, make traces show up in Coval, handle SIP/PSTN/WebSocket trace correlation, or replace the one-command wizard with a security-reviewable manual setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end Coval adversarial / red-team testing workflow. Builds one adversarial test set (12 core attack vectors plus legitimate controls, each with an expected-behavior checklist), creates a persistent "Adversarial User" persona and a Composite Evaluation metric that scores each scenario against its own expected behaviors, launches a multi-iteration run against the agent (voice or chat), polls for completion, builds a per-scenario pass/fail scorecard, and creates a saved report grouped by Test Case. Use when a user wants to follow the Adversarial & Red-Team Testing cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/adversarial-red-team-testing) without doing each step by hand. Triggers: "adversarial test set", "red team my agent", "jailbreak / prompt-injection testing", "test my agent against bad actors".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。