「scope」の検索結果

Create well-formatted git commits following project conventions with emoji, type, and scope

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a tdmcp feature into an implementable spec before any code is written — choose the layer, define the Zod input schema, lay out the TD network topology, plan the bridge/Python approach, sketch a UI wireframe when relevant, and list probe-first risks + the test plan. Use whenever a tdmcp feature idea needs a design/wireframe/spec, or when someone asks to plan/scope/architect a new tool, generator, effect, control, or AI prompt for the TouchDesigner MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combines multi-agent brainstorming, the /grill-me slash command, and the 3 Core Godmodes (godmode-engineering, godmode-ui-ux, godmode-shipping) to force a comprehensive, multi-agent ideation and technical design workflow, ending in a plan-canvas review and a hand-off to /startcycle-graph. Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, design, scope or sharpen a plan, idea or product, or when broad exploration before a build is the situation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk-localize subscription, subscription-group, and in-app purchase display names across App Store locales using asc, including API 4.4.1 version-scoped v2 resources. Use when filling or updating subscription/IAP names and descriptions without App Store Connect UI work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, pedometer, and activity-recognition data using CoreMotion. Use when reading device sensor data, counting steps, detecting user activity (walking/running/driving), tracking altitude changes, or implementing motion-based interactions in iOS/watchOS apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stops "just one more" small tweaks that add scope without changing the outcome. Use when named (just-stop), or when about to implement extra polish, cleanup, or drive-by fixes beyond the stated goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ground rules for an effective subagent in a loop, workflow, or graph run. Stay in scope, escalate when stuck, return structured results. Use when acting as a subagent, writing subagent prompts, or reviewing delegated agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Current attested Codex, Claude Code, and Agent Skills extension contracts for skilltap. Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, or documenting harness adapters; plugin or marketplace manifests; native plugin lifecycle; skill directories or SKILL.md frontmatter; AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md bridges; configuration scopes; compatibility transfer; adoption, reconciliation, status, or update behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual testing + bug filing for Enterprise / SaaS products. Parses a Feishu test doc (scope + repo + bitable URL), observes staging via claude-in-chrome, captures DOM/console/network/screenshot evidence, then dual-tracks each finding — Feishu Bitable record (with attachments) + GitHub issue (<REPO>#<ISSUE_NUMBER> format — English-primary, Chinese collapsed, R2-hosted screenshots, matching type label). Enforces dedup across bitable + GitHub issues + PRs, and mandatory P0/P1/P2 priority prompt when unclear. Trigger whenever the user says "test and report", "test and report side-by-side", "start system testing", "experience staging", "collaborate on bug filing", "collect feedback", a shared Feishu testing doc, a bitable URL + finding, or any UX/bug needing both bitable + GitHub tracking. Do NOT use for writing product code, PR review, CI debugging, or general "how do I use this product" questions — those go to normal dev / PR-review / support flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflection-first problem solving methodology for Convex development. Use before implementing any solution to ensure proper root cause analysis, 98% code confidence, and minimal change scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: implement a scoped ticket, fix a bug, add tests, prepare a PR-ready code change, or reuse a standard builder workflow across software engineer agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the team lead points Architect at a prior agistra.dev hub path and asks it to check for or perform additional migration — trigger phrasing such as 'migrate my data from <path>', 'check what didn't get migrated', 'did we miss anything from my old hub', or 'do a completeness pass on <path>'. Walks the prior hub's full directory tree read-only, diffs it against the fixed scripted migration scope plus any existing migration report, and asks the team lead one clear question at a time about anything a scripted migration would never have discovered. Never writes or copies anything itself — every confirmed item is delegated to the existing migration primitives. Do not use for the first-run scripted migration prompt during `npm run setup` — that is unrelated, already-automated flow this skill does not replace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails for implementation work. Reduces common LLM coding mistakes: overcomplication, silent assumption-picking, scope drift, and unverifiable success criteria. Load on Builder and software-engineer-mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing skill for freelancers and independent consultants. Covers project proposals, bids, client emails, and scope summaries. Leads with the client's problem, not the consultant's background.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the team lead points Architect at a prior agistra.dev hub path and asks it to check for or perform additional migration — trigger phrasing such as 'migrate my data from <path>', 'check what didn't get migrated', 'did we miss anything from my old hub', or 'do a completeness pass on <path>'. Walks the prior hub's full directory tree read-only, diffs it against the fixed scripted migration scope plus any existing migration report, and asks the team lead one clear question at a time about a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use immediately after RBR confirms a root cause and a fix is scoped, before considering the finding complete. Checks whether the confirmed defect is one instance of a structurally identical pattern elsewhere in the same file family, workflow, or business-domain area, and folds in or explicitly defers every other instance found. Mandatory for Architect and CAO — not an optional lens the agent judges when to apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: planner mode, planning mode, proposal, scope definition, estimate, timeline, client message, external communication, pricing, delivery confidence, commercial risk, or project delivery planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan a penetration test", "create a security assessment checklist", "prepare for penetration testing", "define pentest scope", "follow security testing best practices", or needs a structured methodology for penetration testing engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bu skill outlines methodologies for performing authorized penetration testing against AWS, Azure, and GCP cloud environments. It covers understanding the shared responsibility model for testing scope, leveraging cloud-specific attack tools like Pacu and ScoutSuite, exploiting IAM misconfigurations, testing for SSRF to cloud metadata services, and reporting Bul:ings aligned to MITRE ATT&CK Cloud matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect implementations for security flaws including authorization code interception, redirect URI manipulation, CSRF in OAuth flows, token leakage, scope escalation, and PKCE bypass. The tester evaluates the authorization server, client application, and token handling for common misconfigurations that enable account takeover or unauthorized access. Activates for requests involving OAuth security testing, OIDC vulnerability assessment, OAuth2 redirect bypass, or aut...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the documents uploaded for the CURRENT task/row (e.g. an Agentic Table row's attached files) via the `unique-cli uploaded-search "<query>"` command, with the same per-turn citation tracking as `unique-cli search` so cited facts render as `<sup>N</sup>` footnotes and clickable reference chips on the Unique platform. ALWAYS use this skill when the user refers to documents they uploaded/attached to this task, or when you need facts from the task's own attached files. These uploaded files are scoped to the chat, NOT to a knowledge-base folder, so they will NEVER appear in `unique-cli search` results no matter the folder or metadata filters. Use `unique-cli search` for the knowledge base and this command for the task's uploaded documents; the two are complementary and citation numbering is shared across them within a turn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。