「assess」の検索結果

This skill enables Claude to perform comprehensive accessibility audits. It uses the accessibility-test-scanner plugin to identify WCAG 2.1/2.2 compliance issues, validate ARIA attributes, check keyboard navigation, and assess screen reader compatibility. Use this skill when the user requests an accessibility scan, audit, or compliance check, or when terms like "WCAG", "ARIA", "screen reader", "accessibility testing", or "a11y" are mentioned. It provides actionable insights for improving web application accessibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate Joint Commission tracer methodology to assess compliance with accreditation standards across patient care processes and support systems

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android Accessibility Service security analysis and pentesting. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Android security testing, accessibility service abuse, RAT detection, malware analysis, ClayRat, PlayPraetor, overlay phishing, credential harvesting, or any Android app security assessment involving AccessibilityService APIs. This skill helps detect malicious accessibility services, analyze abuse patterns, and harden apps against accessibility-based attacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality review ads before launch by verifying hook strength, checking proof elements, evaluating CTA effectiveness, and assessing visual quality and authenticity. Use as final check before launching creative or when reviewing team submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill enables Claude to audit access control implementations in various systems. It uses the access-control-auditor plugin to identify potential vulnerabilities and misconfigurations related to access control. Use this skill when the user asks to "audit access control", "check permissions", "assess access rights", or requests a "security review" focused on access management. It's particularly useful for analyzing IAM policies, ACLs, and other access control mechanisms in cloud environments, applications, or infrastructure. The skill helps ensure compliance with security best practices and identify potential privilege escalation paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

受け取ったデータから最適化問題の構造を把握し、仮説を立てる。最も重要なスキル。

Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for flow, spectral, and mass cytometry - time-based anomaly cleaning (flowAI, flowCut, PeacoQC, flowClean), margin/boundary event removal, signal-drift detection, dead-cell exclusion, CyTOF Gaussian/DNA/event-length checks, instrument calibration/standardization (MESF, CS&T, peak-2), and batch-level outlier flagging. Use when assessing acquisition quality, choosing a cleaning tool, ordering QC relative to compensation, deciding margin removal before density-based steps, or flagging problematic samples before clustering or differential analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses genetic health of populations for conservation with Ne estimation across time horizons (LDNe NeEstimator V2 option-file API + SNeP physical-linkage correction; recent trajectory via GONE/GONE2; deep history via Stairway Plot 2 / dadi / fastsimcoal2 / PSMC), F-statistics, runs of homozygosity binned by length class to date inbreeding, genetic-load decomposition (Bertorelle 2022 realized vs masked), the modern 100/1000 Ne rule (Frankham 2014), Ne/Nc 2-6 orders of magnitude in marine fish (Hauser & Carvalho 2008), tree-sequence forward simulations (SLiM 4 + pyslim + tskit), and the Sukumaran-Knowles caveat against MSC methods for management-unit definition. Use when estimating Ne by time horizon, detecting inbreeding via F_ROH, decomposing genetic load, justifying conservation thresholds, distinguishing ESU/MU/DPS, configuring NeEstimator V2, or correcting LDNe physical linkage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates tumor mutational burden from WES/WGS/panel data with Friends of Cancer Research harmonization equations, per-assay calibration (FDA 10/Mb = 7.8 TSO500 = 8.4 OncomineTML), synonymous/indel/germline filtering, hypermutator tiering, blood TMB, and integration with HLA-LOH and neoantigen quality (Luksza 2017 fitness). Use when assessing ICI eligibility under tumor-specific cutoffs (McGrail 2021), comparing tissue vs bTMB, or auditing TMB-H reporting against ESMO 2024 and FDA pembrolizumab pan-tumor 2020.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constructs and validates polygenic risk scores using LDpred2-auto, SBayesRC, MegaPRS, PRS-CS, PROSPER, MUSSEL, BridgePRS, JointPRS, PRSmix, or PGS Catalog Calculator with ancestry-aware reference panels (HapMap3, UKB-LD), Pejaver-style calibration, and PRS-RS reporting standards. Use when computing PRS for cohorts, applying Whiffin-style absolute-risk transformation, assessing cross-ancestry portability (Martin 2017 / Ding 2023 continuous ancestry), or auditing PRS manuscripts against the 22-item PRS-RS reviewer checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs retrosynthetic planning using AiZynthFinder (MCTS, template-based), Chemformer (template-free transformer), ASKCOS, and emerging RetroSynFormer with explicit handling of route scoring, building-block availability (eMolecules, Enamine, Mcule), forward prediction validation (Molecular Transformer), and disconnection-aware multi-objective search (MO-MCTS). Use when assessing synthetic feasibility of generated or selected molecules, planning multi-step syntheses, building synthesis-aware design pipelines, or screening libraries for retro-route feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 (119 endpoints with uncertainty), ADMET-AI, DeepChem MolNet, and chemprop D-MPNN with explicit handling of OECD QSAR principles, applicability domain assessment, calibration, hERG/CYP/AMES gold-standard endpoints, and PAINS / Lipinski / Ro5 / Veber / BBB druglikeness filters. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness, prioritizing leads by predicted safety, or building an in-house ADMET QSAR model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate alignment statistics using samtools flagstat, stats, depth, coverage, and mosdepth. Use when assessing alignment quality, calculating coverage, or generating QC reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map owned assets, attack surface, and inventory for systems the requester is authorized to assess. Use for asset discovery, service catalogs, and exposure reviews — never unauthorized scanning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。