「cis」の検索結果

Turn meeting notes or a transcript into sourced decisions, changes and next actions. Use after a customer conversation; review consequential record updates before saving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess a new customer request against agreed scope, trade-offs and ownership. Use when an engagement expands or a custom feature needs a commitment decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map stakeholders, decision rights, influence and blockers from supplied evidence. Use when ownership is unclear or the stakeholder landscape changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a plan, brief or delivery claim against evidence and plausible failure modes. Use when the user asks for a red team or preparation for a consequential decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive one AI agent from another through kolu's terminals: spawn a Claude Code / Codex / opencode session in a PTY, prompt it, watch the screen for its reply, read it, and prompt again — a create→send→snapshot loop run with the `kaval-tui` CLI directly (no MCP). `kaval-tui` writes input and reads scrollback; `pulam-tui` adds a precise agent-state done-signal when you drive hooked terminals. Triggers on "drive another agent", "send a prompt to a terminal agent", "have one agent prompt another", "agent drives agent", "orchestrate agents in terminals", "make Claude drive Codex", "prompt the agent running in that terminal", or wiring a loop where one coding agent supervises another.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retired July 28, 2026 (Legacy FedRAMP Ready). When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a concise plan. Use when a user explicitly asks for a plan related to a coding task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a ForgeCAD design brief, HLD, or LLD before coding by walking through use, assembly, interfaces, decisions, and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research budgeting and funding operations — study budget construction, cost per participant and per insight, burn against milestones, and portfolio prioritisation by decision value. Use when costing, tracking, or ranking research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn reflection into decisions by scoring predictions against outcomes and tracking whether commitments held. Use when running a quarterly review, scoring forecast calibration, or reflection keeps producing notes instead of change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate one-page meeting briefings from structured input (attendees, prior context, decisions needed). Use before customer calls, board meetings, or 1:1s to prepare a pre-read or briefing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate a monthly investor update against a rubric of strong-update sections (transparency, decision-relevance, specific asks). Use before sending a monthly investor update or setting a fundraise communication cadence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize raw user research (interviews, surveys, tickets) into themed findings and decision-ready briefs. Use when synthesizing user interviews, building a findings brief, or communicating research to stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs financial ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction for strategic decision-making

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured legal risk assessment with 5x5 Severity x Likelihood matrix. Use for risk scoring, risk registers, escalation decisions, and risk memos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-functional what-if modeling for compound adversity -- shows how one problem cascades into the next. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or multi-variable threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data leadership advisor on data strategy, governance, quality, and platform decisions. Use when defining a data strategy, scoring data maturity, auditing data governance, evaluating a data platform, or designing the data org.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds positioning, battlecards, and roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building battlecards, tracking market moves, conducting win/loss analysis, or updating positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol running a structured 6-phase deliberation with isolated C-suite contributions to prevent groupthink. Use when making major strategic decisions or resolving cross-functional disagreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Use when building security programs, selecting compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR), managing incidents, or assessing vendor risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots. Use when you need plan validation, board prep, hard-decision frameworks, or pre/post-mortem failure analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。