「decision」の検索結果

Understanding and managing what digital services collect, store, share, and infer about you. Covers password security and entropy, multi-factor authentication, privacy settings, data minimization, the difference between first-party and third-party tracking, cookies and fingerprinting, privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA), and how to respond to data breaches. Use when helping a learner make informed decisions about what to share, with whom, and under what terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Corporate finance fundamentals for evaluating business decisions under cost, time, and risk constraints. Covers time value of money, net present value, internal rate of return, payback period, break-even analysis, cost-benefit analysis, debt vs equity, working capital, and the basic financial statements. Use when evaluating an investment, sizing a funding round, structuring a capital stack, or reading a balance sheet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify the information-need of a query and dispatch it to the appropriate retrieval or reasoning strategy. Use before read-side memory access, before multi-strategy retrieval, or any time you'd otherwise default to "one retriever for everything". Returns a strategy label, a token budget, and a retrieval depth so downstream handlers can be specialised. Backed by Pre-Route (arxiv 2605.10235v2) and MemFlow (arxiv 2605.03312v1), which together show LLMs possess latent routing ability elicitable via a structured prompt — and that externalising the routing decision improves small-model performance by ~2x. Triggers: "route this", "what strategy", "before retrieving", "intent classification", or any query whose ideal handling depends on what KIND of question it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversational guide for using tools/session-retro/observe.mjs to capture friction, wins, corrections, decisions, gaps, tool-use, and checkpoints as they happen during a session. Use at session start (to kick off the log), at inflection points (to record events), and at session end (to archive and feed the retrospective generator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenStack capacity planning operations skill for resource planning, quota management, and scaling decisions. Covers compute capacity (allocation ratios, vCPU/RAM utilization, host aggregates, availability zones), storage capacity (Cinder pool sizing, thin provisioning, Glance storage, Swift rings), network capacity (floating IP pools, port quotas, subnet sizing), project quota management (templates for small/medium/large profiles), flavor sizing strategy, utilization analysis with placement service, growth forecasting from historical metrics, and right-sizing recommendations for underutilized resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision and migration guide for Prisma ORM MongoDB projects on v6, which have no upgrade path to v7. Use when a MongoDB project asks about upgrading Prisma, when "upgrade to prisma 7" comes up in a project with provider = "mongodb", or when evaluating a move to Prisma 8. Triggers on "upgrade prisma mongodb", "prisma 7 mongodb", "mongodb prisma migration", "prisma 8 mongodb".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and annotate cloud cost implications of architectural decisions. Use when reviewing infrastructure changes or designing new services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records hypotheses, evidence and decisions when proposing, running or evaluating forecast experiments, including backtests and feature or model comparisons. Excludes routine tests and unchanged forecast operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access ClinPGx pharmacogenomics data (successor to PharmGKB). Query gene-drug interactions, CPIC guidelines, allele functions, for precision medicine and genotype-guided dosing decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and train AI learning plugins with AgentDB's 9 reinforcement learning algorithms. Includes Decision Transformer, Q-Learning, SARSA, Actor-Critic, and more. Use when building self-learning agents, implementing RL, or optimizing agent behavior through experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with Aptos blockchain - check balances, transfer APT, swap tokens, stake, and execute Move view functions. Features game-theoretic decision analysis with Nash equilibrium detection. All transactions require explicit approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an interactive account org chart, leadership map, buying committee, or manager/report neighborhood around a person. Use for decision makers, reporting-line candidates, stakeholder mapping, and warm intro paths. Skip standalone email lookup and unrelated cross-company prospecting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when facing unknowns, debugging without a clear cause, or making architecture decisions — enforces hypothesis-driven scientific reasoning through observation, hypothesis formulation, prediction, experiment design, and evidence-based conclusion. Use when previous attempts have failed or the problem space involves uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before any CLI/TUI display code is written, modified, or audited — runs the 7-stage discipline (Context, Register, Shape brief, Implement, Critique, Audit, Polish) for Typer, Rich, Textual, and Questionary work, grounded in per-project PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.TUI.md/DESIGN.md. Triggers on output formatting, display design, interactive prompts, visual consistency, TUI layout, progress display, dashboard design, design audit, design polish, design critique, shape brief, register decision (brand-cli vs product-cli), and AI-slop checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define and develop plugin mission statements — purpose, values, anti-patterns, and trade-offs. Use when creating a new plugin, auditing an existing plugin's alignment, or providing a reference for the alignment check loop to evaluate decisions against. Produces mission.json with [draft] status and writes an interview file for the human to refine it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which plugin component type to use and how to organize components at scale. Covers the component lifecycle (discovery and activation phases), decision framework for choosing between commands, skills, agents, hooks, and MCP servers, and organization patterns for each component type. Use when asking "which component type should I use", "command vs skill vs agent", "when to use a hook vs MCP server", "component lifecycle", "how to organize plugin components", "plugin structure patterns", or "scale a plugin with many components".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous feature research and gap analysis. Use when starting /add-new-feature or analyzing existing architecture documents. Explores codebase patterns, identifies ambiguities, and produces feature-context-{slug}.md for orchestrator RT-ICA phase. Does NOT make technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator context window discipline enforcement. Prevents the orchestrator from reading source files it will not edit, running diagnostic commands that waste context, and rationalizing delegation bypasses. Use when setting up orchestrator guardrails, reviewing delegation discipline, or diagnosing context window waste in multi-agent workflows. Activates PreToolUse hooks that surface decision points before source file reads and diagnostic command execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design validation and maintained regression protection before test authoring. Use for TDD increments, acceptance or regression evidence, test boundary/oracle decisions, and multi-factor interaction coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating, grooming, planning, or closing a backlog item. Bridges backlog items to SAM planning with issue, project, and milestone tracking against the configured backend. Activates on interactive browsing with no arguments, loading an item by issue reference or title match to run grooming and SAM planning, autonomous unattended runs that substitute evidence-derived decisions for clarifying questions, a quick path for one-file fixes where full grooming is disproportionate, dismissing an item without completion under a required reason (duplicate, out of scope, superseded, wontfix, blocked), marking an item done with an evidence trail and required summary, or initializing GitHub tracking infrastructure for a project. Stops when the item already has a plan or is blocked on missing information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Look up prior Claude Code sessions when context is lost or forgotten. Use when asked what was done before, what happened in the last session, or any request to recall past conversation history, prior decisions, experiments, or outcomes. Indexes and searches raw JSONL transcripts from ~/.claude/projects/ via DuckDB. Returns verbatim user messages, summarizes AI actions and sub-agent outcomes, detects tool errors and user frustration signals, and reports tool usage statistics. Summaries cached at ~/.claude/kaizen/session-summaries/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a repository has a valuable agentic workflow, prompt chain, playbook, command, or runbook that should become a portable ChatGPT/Codex Skill without losing its real decision logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a referee report for a journal editor. Produces a recommendation, claim-and-design summary, three to six decision-driving concerns, additional concerns, and a revision plan through five parallel adversarial finders, Breaker, Butcher, Shredder, Void, Situator, a Blue Team error filter, Chief Reviewer synthesis, Tone Guard legal pass, and optional confidential editor note. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript. Self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, and author responses go to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection — registry choice (OSF, AEA RCT Registry, AsPredicted, registered reports), PAP structure, models and decision rules locked in advance, analysis code run on simulated data, contingencies for attrition, failed manipulations, and exclusions, deviation records, and timeline. Operationalizes the pre-data-collection side of DA-RT. Use when the user asks to draft or audit a pre-registration or PAP, choose a registry, decide what to lock versus leave exploratory, or handle a later deviation. Hypotheses and estimands come from hypothesis-building, post-hoc reporting from methods-reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。