「error」の検索結果

Create Convex queries, mutations, and actions with proper validation, authentication, and error handling. Use when implementing new API endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug and troubleshoot WorkOS AuthKit authentication issues with Convex. Use when authentication fails, JWT validation errors occur, user identity returns null, email claims are missing, admin access checks fail, or sign in button does not work. Supports Netlify deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Convex queries, mutations, and actions with proper validation, authentication, and error handling. Use when implementing new API endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Sentinel production error capture in your own Convex deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watch for the next dev/prod error or request in a Convex app and react to it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proper Lambda function structure with error handling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REST API design patterns including resource naming, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting for production APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds production-ready REST API endpoints with validation, error handling, authentication, and documentation. Follows best practices for security and scalability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern Angular UI patterns for loading states, error handling, and data display. Use when building UI components, handling async data, or managing component states.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design spec with 98 rules for building CLI tools that AI agents can safely use. Covers structured JSON output, error handling, input contracts, safety guardrails, exit codes, and agent self-description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADHD-friendly output shaping for subagent responses. Lead with the next action, number multi-step tasks, end with one concrete next step, suppress tangents, restate state across turns, give specific time estimates, make wins visible, matter-of-fact errors, cap visible lists to 5, no preamble or closers. Loaded by genin, jonin, anbu, tokubetsu-jonin, and chunin when shaping final responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks to "build a Solana dapp", "write an Anchor program", "create a token", "debug Solana errors", "set up wallet connection", "test my Solana program", "deploy to devnet", or "explain Solana concepts" (rent, accounts, PDAs, CPIs, etc.). End-to-end Solana development playbook covering wallet connection, Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama client generation, LiteSVM/Mollusk/Surfpool testing, and security checklists. Integrates with the Solana MCP server for live documentation search. Prefers framework-kit (@solana/client + @solana/react-hooks) for UI, wallet-standard-first connection (incl. ConnectorKit), @solana/kit for client/RPC code, and @solana/web3-compat for legacy boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate QR code images from text, URLs, or contact information using Python's qrcode library. Supports customization (size, margin, color, error correction) and batch generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generic helpdesk first-response skill for creating KB-based response drafts. Use when handling support tickets, creating response templates, or building a structured helpdesk workflow. Supports error code detection, keyword matching, confidence scoring, multi-language templates, and escalation workflows. Customize by providing your own KB articles and configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a learner needs a structured review session prioritizing high-value topics by recency, error history, and upcoming deadlines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a tested web agent's real behavior from its recorded Pi or Codex session and selected screenshots before scoring. The judge prompt provides absolute artifact paths; use targeted queries to compare actual outputs, errors, and the final answer with the recorded behavior, then return only the verdict JSON. Only for ego-bench judging—never to drive a browser or rerun the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive exploratory testing on a website using browser automation, covering user journeys, forms, errors, accessibility, responsiveness, performance, and security basics. Use when asked to QA a site, explore an app, find bugs, or produce a browser testing report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React bindings for TanStack Router: RouterProvider, useRouter, useRouterState, useMatch, useMatches, useLocation, useSearch, useParams, useNavigate, useLoaderData, useLoaderDeps, useRouteContext, useBlocker, useCanGoBack, Link, Navigate, Outlet, CatchBoundary, ErrorComponent. React-specific patterns for hooks, providers, SSR hydration, and createLink with forwardRef.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for OLS regression and linear models. Activates when the user asks about: "run OLS", "linear regression", "ordinary least squares", "interpret regression results", "heteroskedasticity", "multicollinearity", "regression assumptions", "robust standard errors", "GLS", "WLS", "fit a regression model", "check regression diagnostics", "OLS假设", "最小二乘法", "线性回归", "回归系数", "残差检验", "异方差", "多重共线性", "普通最小二乘", "稳健标准误", "回归诊断"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for panel data models. Activates when the user asks about: "panel data", "fixed effects", "random effects", "Hausman test", "within estimator", "between estimator", "two-way fixed effects", "clustered standard errors panel", "FE model", "RE model", "pooled OLS", "unobserved heterogeneity", "panel regression", "first difference estimator", "entity fixed effects", "time fixed effects", "面板数据", "固定效应", "随机效应", "豪斯曼检验", "双向固定效应", "面板回归", "个体效应", "时间效应", "一阶差分"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NIST Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems (SP 1500-201/202/203, v1.0, 2017). Use for engineering and analyzing cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT: the CPS Framework's aspect × facet grid (nine aspects of concern examined through conceptualization, realization, and assurance facets), cross-property trustworthiness risk management (safety/security/privacy/reliability/resilience together), data interoperability (syntactical/semantic/contextual, canonical models, identifiers, provenance), the timing aspect (time-interval classes, time domains, time-aware networking) and secure/resilient time (GNSS jamming/spoofing, PTP/NTP attacks, holdover, the clock-error model and Allan/MTIE metrics), plus the use-case requirements method. Bridges IT and OT under a clock. Scope limits: a 2017 living/draft document, thin on post-2017 standards and on detailed control catalogs; it names but does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 and 15288 process text or permission-licensed third-party figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one service catalogue entry (description, scope in and out, owners and support groups, service levels exactly as provided, request path, dependencies, charging, lifecycle) from the service team's notes, questionnaire answers or existing documents, with UNKNOWN and a question list for every field the inputs do not cover. Never invents a service level, owner or price. Use when the user asks to "write the catalogue entry for this service", "turn these questionnaire answers into a service description", "tidy this request catalogue item" or "check this draft entry for empty fields". Do not use for a how-to or known-error article, use knowledge-article-drafter instead; for operating procedures, use runbook-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an engineer's notes, a ticket history or a chat thread into a draft step-by-step runbook with preconditions, stop conditions, numbered steps with checks, verification, rollback and escalation, for the team to validate before use. Commands verbatim, placeholders marked, every gap UNKNOWN; never executes a step or fills a gap from general knowledge. Use when the user asks to "write a runbook from these notes", "turn this resolved ticket into a runbook", "document the steps we ran" or "check this runbook for gaps". Do not use for a business process without commands, use sop-drafter instead; for a knowledge article or known-error record, use knowledge-article-drafter; for the post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。