4,629 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Back Out Right — a drop-in CSS keyframe animation from Animate.css (Hippocratic-2.1, © Daniel Eden). No JS required. Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Use restrained; attribute Animate.css.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bounce Out Left — a drop-in CSS keyframe animation from Animate.css (Hippocratic-2.1, © Daniel Eden). No JS required. Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Use restrained; attribute Animate.css.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fade Left — a composable AnimXYZ entrance via the xyz="fade left-3" attribute. Declarative: mix fade + move + scale + rotate without writing keyframes. MIT. Honors prefers-reduced-motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Back Out Up — a drop-in CSS keyframe animation from Animate.css (Hippocratic-2.1, © Daniel Eden). No JS required. Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Use restrained; attribute Animate.css.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bounce — a drop-in CSS keyframe animation from Animate.css (Hippocratic-2.1, © Daniel Eden). No JS required. Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Use restrained; attribute Animate.css.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rotate In — a composable AnimXYZ entrance via the xyz="fade rotate-right-45" attribute. Declarative: mix fade + move + scale + rotate without writing keyframes. MIT. Honors prefers-reduced-motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bounce In Down — a drop-in CSS keyframe animation from Animate.css (Hippocratic-2.1, © Daniel Eden). No JS required. Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Use restrained; attribute Animate.css.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rise Big — a composable AnimXYZ entrance via the xyz="fade up-5 big-25%" attribute. Declarative: mix fade + move + scale + rotate without writing keyframes. MIT. Honors prefers-reduced-motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bounce Out Right — a drop-in CSS keyframe animation from Animate.css (Hippocratic-2.1, © Daniel Eden). No JS required. Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Use restrained; attribute Animate.css.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fade Up — a composable AnimXYZ entrance via the xyz="fade up-3" attribute. Declarative: mix fade + move + scale + rotate without writing keyframes. MIT. Honors prefers-reduced-motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a student's self-determined project with mentoring checkpoints, competency alignment, and reflection. Use when guiding student-led projects within a competency-based framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a scoped topic across three coexisting horizons — current system under strain (H1), preferred future (H3), and transition innovations sorted as H2+ or H2- — to understand change dynamics and identify responsible next actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a structured goal-setting protocol using SMART or implementation-intention frameworks for students. Use when launching units, projects, or developing student self-direction habits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and navigate genuine dilemmas in curriculum, school, or community contexts — tensions between competing goods that cannot be solved, only navigated. Produces a structured dilemma map with both poles named and both/and possibilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define the scope and purpose of a complex inquiry before mapping or futures work begins. Use when a class or group needs to agree what they are investigating, who it matters to, and at what scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate argument structure scaffolds using Toulmin, PEEL, or CER frameworks for a specific claim or question. Use when teaching argumentative or analytical writing across any subject.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tags harness-decomposed curriculum items (KUDs, LTs, criteria) with a school's developmental band metadata while preserving source voice and labels. Supply the band schema; the skill derives mapping rules from it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk-based vendor assessment framework for IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners under DORA, NIS2, GDPR. Provides three-phase process (Initial Screening / Detailed Assessment / Final Evaluation), six-dimension risk scoring (Financial/Operational/Compliance/Security/Reputational/Strategic) with weighted matrices, full DORA Art. 28-30 contractual checklist, NIS2 Art. 21(2) security measures enumeration, GDPR Art. 28 documentation checks, red flags per dimension, trigger-based review criteria, and document templates. Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting critical ICT third-party due diligence under DORA, (3) Performing supply chain security assessment under NIS2, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring, (6) Assessing concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive vendor risk reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (25 mandatory, 7 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-pass framework for reading, interpreting, and structuring statutory analysis of US federal, state, and local law. Produces draft analysis for attorney review — not legal advice. Use this skill whenever the user references a specific US statute, regulation, ordinance, or rule by citation, asks "what does [statute X] require," asks for compliance scoping, applicability thresholds, requirement extraction, exemption analysis, definitional analysis, federal preemption analysis, or multi-state comparison — even if they don't explicitly ask for "statutory analysis." Halts and asks for missing inputs rather than guessing. Out of scope for non-US law.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Critically assess and improve a legal scholarly thesis, article idea, student note, seminar-paper claim, or research agenda using Eugene Volokh's novelty, nonobviousness, utility, and soundness framework, connector-aware research, claim-specific tests, and a sustainable adversarial pass. Produces a self-contained green-, yellow-, or red-light report. Use when a law professor or law student asks whether a claim is viable, novel, publishable, preempted, useful, worth pursuing, or better than competing topics; or wants a thesis stress-tested, narrowed, repaired, or compared. No connector is required: use connected legal and scholarly research when available, public sources otherwise, and disclose any no-research fallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。