5,134 件 ・ 関連度順
Resolve one short headline from random glyphs — a techy decode reveal. One short line only; keep it fast. The resolved text is the real, accessible content; under prefers-reduced-motion it appears instantly with no scramble. Avoid on body copy and calm/luxury tones.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skeleton placeholders with a soft sweeping shimmer while content loads. Use to fill space for cards/lists/profiles that are still loading and make the wait feel shorter. Honors prefers-reduced-motion (static skeleton). Only show while real content is loading — never as decoration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An RGB-split glitch flickers across a headline — a techy, edgy reveal. One short line; techy tones only. Pure CSS; steady under prefers-reduced-motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lift a clickable card toward the viewer on hover with a deepening shadow — a tactile, responsive cue. Pure CSS, no JS. Only use on actually-clickable cards (motion implies clickability). Honors prefers-reduced-motion (static). Avoid on very dense grids where many lifts feel noisy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Text curves around a circle and slowly rotates — a decorative badge/seal accent. Decorative only; keep the phrase short. Static ring under prefers-reduced-motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A bottom sheet slides up over a dimmed backdrop, then dismisses. An App-UI micro-interaction (mobile component feedback). Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Keep it short and snappy; only on controls that actually change state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A toast slides up from the bottom, holds, then fades away. An App-UI micro-interaction (mobile component feedback). Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Keep it short and snappy; only on controls that actually change state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A bottom tab bar whose active pill slides between tabs. An App-UI micro-interaction (mobile component feedback). Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Keep it short and snappy; only on controls that actually change state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A checkbox that pops and draws its check on toggle. An App-UI micro-interaction (mobile component feedback). Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Keep it short and snappy; only on controls that actually change state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A Material-style ripple spreads from the point of contact. An App-UI micro-interaction (mobile component feedback). Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Keep it short and snappy; only on controls that actually change state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A button that springs down on press and pops back — tactile tap feedback. An App-UI micro-interaction (mobile component feedback). Honors prefers-reduced-motion. Keep it short and snappy; only on controls that actually change state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit all language versions of a site for parity and quality. Tags only → hreflang-check. "is the German site missing pages"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft content in brand voice through a gated pipeline: blogs, ads, emails. Brief only → content-brief. "write a blog post about X"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and navigate genuine dilemmas in curriculum, school, or community contexts — tensions between competing goods that cannot be solved, only navigated. Produces a structured dilemma map with both poles named and both/and possibilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has run multiple evaluation skills and wants a comprehensive analysis — maturity assessment, cross-skill signals, trends, prioritized actions, and an executive summary. Also use when the user mentions eval health check, evaluation audit, ship readiness, evaluation maturity, or "how good is my evaluation system itself." This is a read-only analysis skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and recommend **combinations** of agent skills to complete complex, multi-faceted tasks. Provides two recommendation strategies — **Maximum Quality** (best skill per subtask) and **Minimum Dependencies** (fewest installs). Use this skill whenever the user wants to find skills, asks "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", or describes a task that likely requires multiple capabilities working together. Also use when the user mentions composing workflows, building pipelines, or needs help across several domains at once — even if they only say "find me a skill". This skill supersedes simple single-skill search by decomposing the task into subtasks and assembling an optimal skill portfolio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sanctions and export control analysis tool for Claude Desktop. Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries. All results sourced and verified in real time — no memory-based answers. Responds in French, English, German, Spanish, Russian and Chinese. Updated 19 May 2026 (EU 20th package, UK SEUC, Cuba EO). Indicative guidance only — not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brief statutes and legislative Acts using the MAPS + RULES framework. Use when briefing statutes, analyzing legislative text, mapping statutory structure, extracting rule-modules from provisions, applying statutes to scenarios, or any statutory analysis task. Triggers include "brief this statute," "analyze this Act," "map the statute," "apply [statute] to [scenario]," "what are the elements of [provision]," "statutory analysis," or references to codified sections (such as 42 U.S.C. sections or Texas Health & Safety Code). Supports two modes - (A) text-only briefing for structural analysis, and (B) scenario-driven briefing that applies statutory provisions to specific facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects prompt injection hidden in documents from the other side (pleadings, skeletons, bundles, served evidence, opponents' emails and attachments) before an AI reads them, so the model is not turned against your client. Checks word by word that the text an extractor hands the model was visibly drawn on the page: white, near-white, covered, clipped, off-page, tiny, transparent and invisible-mode text in PDF (ink test plus OCR); Word formatting resolved as Word does (styles, shading, theme colours, scaling, off-page frames, fallbacks, unused headers); HTML/CSS, RTF, email with attachments and zips, xlsx/pptx and legacy formats. Flags Unicode smuggling, text addressed to an AI and authorities found only in hidden text. Fails closed. Optional Read-tool hook. Use BEFORE any AI summary or analysis of an opposing or third-party document. Triggers: 'scan for injection', 'is this document safe', 'check the other side's skeleton', 'injection guard'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews outside counsel invoices and related billing data for an in-house legal department, including LEDES or e-billing exports, OCGs, approved rates, discounts, budgets, AFAs, and staffing rules. Starts with internal comparisons before bringing in external data. Produces invoice review findings, MBR/QBR scorecards, dispute logs, and management reports. For demonstration purposes only and not professional advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。