Create safe, deterministic git worktrees for large or risky workstreams. Use when tasks are complex enough to warrant isolation from the main working tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,265 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Create safe, deterministic git worktrees for large or risky workstreams. Use when tasks are complex enough to warrant isolation from the main working tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform repository-aware code reviews focused on bugs, regressions, architectural violations, missing tests, and operational risks. Use when the user asks for review of diffs, pull requests, patches, or implementation quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create safe, deterministic git worktrees for large or risky workstreams using the repository-owned runtime helper and Windows-safe defaults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect risky OAuth application consent grants in Azure AD / Microsoft Entra ID using Microsoft Graph API, audit logs, and permission analysis to identify illicit consent grant attacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and exploit NoSQL injection vulnerabilities in MongoDB, CouchDB, and other NoSQL databases to demonstrate authentication bypass, data extraction, and unauthorized access risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Metasploit Framework is the world's most widely used penetration testing platform, maintained by Rapid7. It contains over 2,300 exploits, 1,200 auxiliary modules, and 400 post-exploitation modules
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies and exploits SMB protocol vulnerabilities using Metasploit Framework during authorized penetration tests to demonstrate risks from unpatched Windows systems, misconfigured shares, and weak authentication in enterprise networks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish a structured operational process to triage, test, and deploy Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates within risk-based remediation SLAs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a vulnerability aging dashboard and SLA tracking system to measure remediation performance against severity-based timelines and drive accountability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute authorized vishing (voice phishing) pretext calls to assess employee susceptibility to social engineering and evaluate security awareness controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parses Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) in CycloneDX and SPDX JSON formats to identify supply chain vulnerabilities by correlating components against the NVD CVE database via the NVD 2.0 API. Builds dependency graphs, calculates risk scores, identifies transitive vulnerability paths, and generates compliance reports. Activates for requests involving SBOM analysis, software composition analysis, supply chain security assessment, dependency vulnerability scanning, CycloneDX/SPDX parsing, or CVE correlation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor and analyze ransomware group data leak sites (DLS) to track victim postings, extract threat intelligence on group tactics, and assess sector-specific ransomware risk for proactive defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auditing Google Cloud Platform IAM permissions to identify overly permissive bindings, primitive role usage, service account key proliferation, and cross-project access risks using gcloud CLI, Policy Analyzer, and IAM Recommender.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a bounded red-green-refactor feedback loop only when the user explicitly requests TDD, accepts reproduction-first proof for a bug, or an accepted high-risk behavior specifically requires red/green evidence; do not trigger for every logic, bug, behavior, or implementation change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code-review quality gate and test-enhancement rubric. Use when ROSE needs sharper review output contracts, severity and risk prioritization, evidence anchors, negative review cases, fixture or golden-output drift guidance, or a Chinese review report profile; do not use as a duplicate code-review agent or final PASS authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a bounded security design/hardening pass for explicit security or threat-model intent, or a concrete auth/authorization/secret/untrusted-input/file-upload/sensitive-data risk; do not trigger for every input, data store, third-party call, implementation, review, or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct one bounded evidence-grounded code review when the user explicitly requests review or ROSE names a concrete unresolved correctness/quality risk; do not trigger automatically after implementation, before every merge, for every bug fix/refactor, or as a completion gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scores and prioritizes technical debt by impact, risk, and effort. Provides ranked backlog with ROI analysis and quarterly paydown recommendations. Use for "tech debt", "technical debt management", "code quality", or "refactoring priorities".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds phased data and system migrations using feature flags, dual writes, backfills, and validation. Includes rollback plans and risk mitigation. Use for "data migration", "system migration", "database migration", or "platform migration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates Request for Comments documents for technical proposals including problem statement, solution design, alternatives, risks, and rollout plans. Use for "RFC", "technical proposals", "design docs", or "architecture proposals".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits project dependencies for outdated packages, duplicates, heavy/problematic libraries, security vulnerabilities, and risky version combinations. Generates prioritized reports with security, performance, and maintainability insights, upgrade paths, and safe pinning recommendations. Use when users request dependency audits, package updates, security checks, or dependency optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates safe refactor plans for messy UI code including component splitting strategies, state simplification, performance optimizations, and accessibility improvements. Provides phased approach, risk assessment, and "done" criteria. Use when refactoring "legacy code", "messy components", "performance issues", or "large files".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Spark change needs its authoritative owner, affected boundaries, risks, acceptance criteria, and smallest verifiable slice established before implementation or review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a research proposal needs work packages, milestones, deliverables, a timeline, a risk register, and budget-justification scaffolding, while keeping scientific claims and feasibility honest and human-owned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。