3,746 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Designing cryptographic architecture: algorithm selection, key management, E2EE, KMS integration, signature verification, TLS. Use when designing crypto protocols or key rotation flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designing new skill agents via gap analysis, overlap detection, SKILL.md + reference generation, and Nexus integration. Not for task orchestration (Nexus) or format-only audits (Gauge).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizing frontend (re-render, memoization, lazy loading) and backend (N+1, indexing, caching, async) performance, plus continuous auto-tuning loops for GC/threadpool/cache/worker settings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Constructing landing pages from a focused section to a premium multi-stage studio pipeline: structure, copy, conversion, responsive build, craft gates, and launch handoffs. Use when building or optimizing an LP, CTA, conversion flow, or premium launch surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers and invokes agent skills. Use when starting a session, or when you need to decide which skill or workflow applies to the piece of work at hand. This is the meta-skill that governs how all other skills are discovered and invoked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer finance and market-data questions with the You.com `you-finance` MCP tool: stock prices, tickers, earnings, company financials, and market trends, with payment-aware fallbacks for keyless hosts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search the live web and read full pages with You.com. Use whenever a task needs information newer than training data or from outside the codebase: current library docs and API references, changelogs and release notes, breaking changes, error messages, package versions, pricing, news, or any claim to verify with cited sources. Works keyless through the free MCP profile when no You.com credentials are configured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use test-driven development for behavior-changing feature or fix work, and whenever the user mentions TDD, test-first, red-green-refactor, tracer bullets, integration tests, or public-interface behavior tests. Skip for docs-only, path-only rename, formatting-only, or purely mechanical chores unless explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan how to build with You.com. Use when adding web search, content extraction, or research to an app or agent: finds the right You.com API, MCP server, SDK, or docs path (for example Vercel AI SDK, LangChain, Python SDK, or REST) through the `you-discover` tool and Docs MCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A complete fiction-writing studio, run as a team of named specialist agents, that guides an author from a bare idea to a polished prose manuscript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, plan, or revise fiction — a novel, novella, short story, or series. Trigger on requests like "help me write a novel", "I have an idea for a story", "develop my characters", "build a world for my fantasy", "outline my plot", "fix this scene", "my dialogue feels flat", "give me beta-reader feedback", or any time the user is doing creative storytelling and would benefit from structured, craft-aware guidance. Also trigger when the user names a studio member (Homer, Aristotle, Fyodor, Tolkien, Scheherazade, Oscar, Max, Virginia, Borges, Bloom) or asks to switch creative roles / bring in a specialist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act as a product-manager copilot that turns evidence into product decisions and artifacts: backlogs and prioritization, PRDs and user stories, metrics and OKRs, experiments, launch plans, feedback triage, and pricing/packaging, kept in a per-product workspace. Use whenever the user wants to decide what to build, spec it, or ship it: "write a PRD for…", "prioritize our backlog", "what should we build next", "plan OKRs", "define our north star metric", "design an A/B test", "plan the launch", "triage this customer feedback", "platform or feature?", in any language ("viết PRD", "ưu tiên tính năng nào", "quản lý sản phẩm", "プロダクト管理", "产品经理"), even when they never say "product manager". Also use when the user returns to a product workspace this skill created (a directory holding `product.md`, `state.md`, and `decisions.md`). Not for deep user discovery (design-thinking), desk market facts (market-researcher), or company-level bets (strategy-board).
Conduct rigorous, citation-backed desk market research: quick go/no-go market scans, market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), competitor analysis, customer demand signals, and trend/macro (PESTEL) analysis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to research, size, validate, or enter a market — "is there a market for…", "how big is the market for…", "who are the competitors of…", "should I build/launch/sell…", "validate this business idea", "market research for…", "market entry" — in any language and for any country's market (e.g. "nghiên cứu thị trường", "étude de marché", "市場調査", "análisis de mercado"), even when the user never says the words "market research". Also use it when another skill or workflow (strategy-board, design-thinking, a product brief) needs external market facts delivered into its fact base or research folder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act as an end-to-end data scientist: turn business questions into defensible analysis, validated models, and decision-ready reports. Use whenever the user asks to analyze, explore, or profile a dataset or CSV/Parquet/Excel file; asks what drives a metric or why a number changed ("why did churn go up?"); wants to test whether a difference is real (A/B tests, experiments, "is this significant?", "how many samples do I need?"); wants a predictive model (churn, forecast, scoring, segmentation, classification, regression); asks to review an existing analysis, notebook, or model for flaws; or needs results written up for decision-makers. Triggers in any language ("phân tích dữ liệu", "xây model dự đoán", "kiểm định A/B"), even when they never say "data science" or "statistics".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and run manual tests of the project's running app. Runs a session in one of five modes: exploratory, verification, smoke, assessment (UX, localization, accessibility, improvement review), or AI probe. Also writes a manual test plan that holds only what automated tests cannot judge. Use whenever the user asks, in any language, for something to be tested by hand or for a manual test plan — "manual test", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "verify the bug fix", "smoke test", "QA this screen", "review this screen's UX", "what would you improve", "check the localized copy", "test the AI agent's answers", "write manual test cases", "kịch bản test manual" — or assigns a test design, test plan or test-case IDs to execute by hand. Not for writing automated tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coach structured brainstorming sessions on any topic: diverge on ideas together, then converge on priorities and next steps in a session document. Use whenever the user wants ideas or wants to think out loud, in any language ("brainstorm with me", "give me ideas for…", "help me come up with…", "let's explore options for…", "I'm stuck on the name / the features"; Vietnamese "brainstorm cùng tôi", "cho tôi ý tưởng", "nghĩ cùng tôi xem"), even when they never say "brainstorm". Also use when the user wants multiple perspectives or a devil's-advocate pass on their ideas ("give me different angles", "phản biện mấy ý tưởng này", "party mode"). Not for diagnosing why something is failing (problem-solver), user research (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read, study, and answer questions about long books and papers without loading the whole text into one context window, keeping page-anchored notes as a reusable workspace. Use whenever the user asks to read, study, summarize, analyze, review, or answer questions about a long book, textbook, PDF, EPUB, thesis, dissertation, survey paper, or any document of roughly 50+ pages, in any language (Vietnamese "đọc sách", "tóm tắt sách", "phân tích luận án"). Also use when a `{slug}-notes/` workspace from a previous session sits next to a source file and the user asks a follow-up question about that book. Not for short documents (under ~30 pages) that fit in context; read those directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create high-quality, model-aware system prompts for any LLM (Claude, GPT, Gemini, open-source, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, write, build, design, draft, or improve a system prompt, system instructions, or custom instructions for any AI model. Also trigger when the user asks about prompt engineering, prompt design, prompt optimization, or wants to define behavior for an AI assistant, chatbot, agent, or any LLM-powered application — even if they don't explicitly say "system prompt". Covers all use cases including chatbots, agentic systems, tool-use workflows, content generation, data extraction, code assistants, and multi-turn conversations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a full design-thinking engagement (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) grounded in real user evidence. Use whenever the user wants to understand users deeply and design a solution for them: "run design thinking", "understand our users", "design user interviews", "synthesize these interview notes", "build personas", "write How-Might-We questions", "prototype this concept", "design a usability test", "our users are churning and we don't know why", in any language ("tư duy thiết kế", "nghiên cứu người dùng", "phỏng vấn khách hàng", "デザイン思考", "设计思维"), even when they never say "design thinking". Also use when the user drops raw interview notes, transcripts, or survey exports and wants insights, personas, or product decisions. Not for "is there a market for X" desk questions (market-researcher).
Score candidate CVs on a 100-point scale against a Job Description. Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate, score, rank, or screen candidate CVs/resumes against a JD. Also trigger when the user mentions 'review CV', 'screen resume', 'rate candidates', 'shortlist', or any context involving matching resumes to job requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the reasoning of a document or argument (memo, proposal, investment analysis, board paper, article, the user's own draft): claims, evidence, unstated assumptions, logical gaps, fallacies, and what would falsify it, each anchored to quoted text. Use whenever the user wants reasoning examined, in any language ("audit this argument", "is this analysis sound", "poke holes in this proposal", "review the logic of my draft"; Vietnamese "phản biện giúp tôi", "soi lập luận này", "tài liệu này có lỗ hổng gì", "góp ý bản nháp của tôi"), even when they never say "critical thinking". Also use when the user drops a document and asks whether to trust or act on it, or asks to see their reasoning profile. Not for company-level strategic bets (strategy-board) or learning a topic through dialogue (socratic-questor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。