「scope」の検索結果

Adversarial triage of open review findings on a PR. Every finding (Codex, Claude bot, Gemini) is a hostile hypothesis to REFUTE — fix only what is proven real, reachable, in the PR's scope, and above the round's severity bar. The bar rises every review round. Everything else is declined or filed as an issue. Use for 'fix the PR findings', '/fix', '/fix 123', or before any fix commit in a review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clear the freeze boundary set by /freeze, allowing edits to all directories again. Use when you want to widen edit scope without ending the session. Use when asked to "unfreeze", "unlock edits", "remove freeze", or "allow all edits". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to review a plan, challenge a proposal, run a CEO review, poke holes in an approach, think bigger about scope, or decide whether to expand or reduce the plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restrict file edits to a specific directory for the session. Blocks Edit and Write outside the allowed path. Use when debugging to prevent accidentally "fixing" unrelated code, or when you want to scope changes to one module. Use when asked to "freeze", "restrict edits", "only edit this folder", or "lock down edits". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full safety mode: destructive command warnings + directory-scoped edits. Combines /careful (warns before rm -rf, DROP TABLE, force-push, etc.) with /freeze (blocks edits outside a specified directory). Use for maximum safety when touching prod or debugging live systems. Use when asked to "guard mode", "full safety", "lock it down", or "maximum safety". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when asked to "auto review", "autoplan", "run all reviews", "review this plan automatically", or "make the decisions for me". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan file and wants to run the full review gauntlet without answering 15-30 intermediate questions. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "auto plan", "automatic review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Obtains a valid Adobe IMS access token for the DA (Document Authoring) API. Use this skill as a prerequisite step whenever another skill needs to call admin.da.live — for example, before pushing HTML content, listing documents, or triggering a DA preview. Do NOT use this skill if you already have a valid DA_TOKEN in scope from a previous step in the same session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes development requirements and generates structured acceptance criteria for AEM Edge Delivery Services (EDS) tasks. Use when the user needs to define acceptance criteria, write requirements, scope work, or create a definition of done for EDS blocks, components, variants, bug fixes, or styling changes. Produces task breakdowns, identifies edge cases, and documents analysis for new blocks, variants, behavior modifications, CSS-only changes, and bug fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check, acquire, or release a governed scope lock.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review correctness, access, repository ownership, authority, localization, compatibility, resources, scope, and verification evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preserve user work, scope, metadata, history, and verifiable delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, improve, and compress every skill in the repo using live research. Load when the user asks to improve skills, audit the skill library, upgrade existing skills, refresh with new research, do a skill health check, or says "improve all skills", "update the skill library", "skill audit", or "run an improvement pass". Applies live domain research, fixes structural gaps, checks for skill linking opportunities, then rewrites and resizes each skill. Supports TARGETED mode (`TARGET=<skill> [SKIP_RESEARCH=true]`) for single-skill fixes, including learn-from-chat restructure escalations. All skills are in scope including meta skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map symbol dependencies, callers, and blast radius before editing code. Load when the user asks what depends on a symbol, what breaks if they change something, blast radius of a change, reverse dependencies, or which tests cover a function. Also triggers on "who calls this", "impact of changing", "dependency map", "what uses this", "find callers", or before any non-trivial edit when safe-change is not yet active. Pairs with codebase-understanding for broad architecture; this skill is symbol-scoped and edit-gated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create focused role prompts for agents in multi-agent topologies. Load when agent-builder needs role prompts for agents, or when a user asks to "create an agent prompt", "write a role prompt", "define agent identity", "write an agent role", "prompt for this agent", "write instructions for this agent", "agent persona". Scope: agent role prompts only (v1). System prompts, task prompts, and skill invocation prompts are future TODOs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect GitHub PR checks with gh, pull failing GitHub Actions logs, summarize failure context, then create a fix plan and implement after user approval. Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing PR CI/CD checks on GitHub Actions and wants a plan + code changes; for external checks (e.g., Buildkite), only report the details URL and mark them out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and filter Datadog logs from the shell using the Composio CLI. Run scoped log searches, pivot across services/environments, and export structured JSON for downstream agents instead of click-driving the Datadog UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembles a genome de novo from Illumina short reads with SPAdes (isolate/careful/sc/meta/plasmid/rna modes), MEGAHIT (low-memory, huge datasets), Unicycler (bacterial finishing/hybrid), MaSuRCA (large hybrid), ABySS (Bloom-filter), and Platanus (heterozygous diploids), using multi-k de Bruijn graphs. Covers the repeat-resolution limit, why N50 plateaus at the genome not the depth, GenomeScope2 k-mer profiling first, the heterozygosity/haplotig trap, error-correction erasing rare alleles, GC dropout, and NG50/auN/BUSCO reporting. Use when assembling a bacterial isolate, fungal, small-eukaryotic, single-cell, or metagenome genome from Illumina reads, or when deciding whether short reads can even produce the assembly being asked for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profiles a genome from raw reads BEFORE assembly with a k-mer spectrum (KMC or Jellyfish histogram), then models it with GenomeScope2 to estimate genome size, heterozygosity, repeat content, and ploidy, and Smudgeplot to infer ploidy from heterozygous k-mer pairs (diploid AB vs triploid AAB vs tetraploid AABB). Covers choosing k via Merqury best_k.sh, the k-mer-coverage vs sequencing-coverage confusion, reading het/repeat/contamination/organelle peaks, why noisy ONT must not be used for counting, and how the estimate becomes the NG50 denominator, the Flye -g value, the hifiasm --hom-cov/purge setting, and the 1.5-2x-too-big haplotig sanity check. Use when starting any de novo assembly, deciding whether short reads can work, estimating genome size for an unknown organism, diagnosing ploidy, or sanity-checking an assembly's size against expectation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about FMCSA investigation types — Focused Investigation vs Comprehensive Review vs Compliance Review (CR) vs Investigation, when each is triggered, scope differences, on-site vs off-site, and how to prepare for each. Cite 49 CFR 385 Subpart C + D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover failure modes in Coval runs, uploaded conversations or local conversation exports using scoped sampling and transcript, audio and trace evidence. Prepare human review without inventing ground truth or launching new runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end execution of a scouted third-party provider access campaign. Use when a Provider Access Launch task is ready_to_submit or scouted easy_execute and needs account or app registration, scopes, reviewer assets, Vault credential custody, the canonical connection, and real verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision-ready scouting record for a user-connected provider access campaign. Use when an assigned Provider Access Launch task needs its easiest official route, minimum scopes, cost, account needs, approval path, implementation consumer, and easy-execute verdict established before submission. NOT for client Local Listings distribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。