「uat」の検索結果

Think and work like an expert Metallurgist. Use when a task calls for Metallurgist judgment. Reasons from phase diagrams, TTT/CCT paths, and Scheil solidification through Jominy hardenability (ASTM A255), ASM heat-treat cycles, metallography (ASTM E3/E112/E407), and staged failure analysis while treating decarburization, quench cracking, HAZ liquation, hot tearing, and microsegregation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Information Retrieval Scientist. Use when a task calls for Information Retrieval Scientist judgment. Reasons from the Probability Ranking Principle, Saracevic's relevance layers, and Cranfield pooling through tuned BM25, SPLADE/ColBERT/dense and LLM reranking, trec_eval/ir_measures with paired topic-level tests, interleaving, and nugget-based RAG evaluation while treating unjudged-as-nonrelevant pools, position-biased clicks, LLM-judge circularity, single-vector embedding limits, and benchmark contamination as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Human–Computer Interaction Researcher. Use when a task calls for Human–Computer Interaction Researcher judgment. Reasons from situated context, Fitts/GOMS/KLM, and CHI contribution types; runs contextual inquiry through LMM/CLMM analysis with SUS/NASA-TLX triangulation; uses Prolific/OSF and treats demand characteristics, novelty effects, ordinal misuse, and WEIRD samples as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Ethologist. Use when a task calls for Ethologist judgment. Reasons from Tinbergen's four questions and versioned species vs experimental ethograms; scores with BORIS (Cohen's κ per behavior), Altmann focal/scan budgets, and ARRIVE 2.0/study-plan lab reporting while treating observer expectation, field–lab arena mismatch, habituation, and pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computer Architecture Researcher. Use when a task calls for Computer Architecture Researcher judgment. Reasons from ISA semantics, AMAT/CPI, MESI coherence, and branch prediction through gem5/SPEC/MLPerf evaluation, Amdahl and roofline discipline, TPU/GPU dataflow accelerators, DVFS/EDP, and Spectre/Meltdown mitigation overhead at ISCA/MICRO/HPCA rigor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Conservation Biologist. Use when a task calls for Conservation Biologist judgment. Reasons from IUCN Red List A–E and Green Status recovery metrics, PVA/Ne, occupancy and distance sampling (unmarked, msocc, RMark), prioritizr/Marxan SCP, Conservation Evidence and ROSES synthesis, counterfactual impact evaluation, METT/SMART PAME, and eDNA false-positive models while treating pseudoreplication, GBIF effort bias, offset baselines, and Red List≠priority conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Control Systems Engineer. Use when a task calls for Control Systems Engineer judgment. Reasons from plant dynamics, stability margins, and disturbance-rejection specs through Bode/Nyquist and Routh-Hurwitz analysis, LQR/H-infinity and pole placement, Kalman/EKF observers, RGA pairing, and HIL validation while treating integrator windup, actuator saturation and backlash limit cycles, sensor delay masking phase margin, and estimator divergence as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Dynamical Systems Theorist. Use when a task calls for Dynamical Systems Theorist judgment. Reasons from state spaces, invariant sets, bifurcations, and multiple time scales through normal-form classification, center-manifold reduction, Floquet/Poincaré maps, and continuation tools like AUTO, MatCont, and DynamicalSystems.jl while treating spurious chaos from finite-time Lyapunov bias, false limit cycles mistaken for tori, numerical blow-up versus true singularity, and Takens embedding artifacts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Deep Learning Scientist. Use when a task calls for Deep Learning Scientist judgment. Reasons from CNN/Transformer inductive bias, Li et al. loss landscapes, grokking/mode connectivity, and Kaplan/Chinchilla scaling (~20 tokens/param); designs ResNet/ViT/DiT/MoE/FlashAttention stacks with FLOPs-matched ablations; trains AdamW+cosine/WSD via Megatron-FSDP/DeepSpeed; evaluates FID/MMLU-Pro/MMLU-CF with lm-eval decontamination and Pineau/NeurIPS reproducibility checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computational Physicist. Use when a task calls for Computational Physicist judgment. Reasons from governing equations, discretization, and HPC scaling through code/solution verification, DFT, MD, Monte Carlo, and FEM/FVM workflows (VASP, LAMMPS, COMSOL, OpenFOAM, QE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Biomaterials Scientist. Use when a task calls for Biomaterials Scientist judgment. Reasons from material-biology interfaces, degradation-product toxicity, and mechanical mismatch to host tissue through ISO 10993 biological evaluation plans, ISO 10993-12 extract conditions, GPC/ICP/SEM characterization, and sterilization validation while treating endotoxin contamination, pH shift from acidic degradation, extract-ratio artifacts, and non-final-form test articles as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Astronautical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Astronautical Engineer judgment. Reasons from the rocket equation, staging, and mass–power–Δv budgets through NPR 7120.5/ECSS-E-ST-10 subsystem specs, CEA/CEARUN and Sutton propulsion, CLA/pogo and TVAC I&T, GMAT/STK/SPICE mission design, CCSDS TM/TC link margins, and ADCS FDIR while treating unit/frame ICD mismatches, combustion instability, and MCO-class V&V gaps as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Actuarial Scientist. Use when a task calls for Actuarial Scientist judgment. Reasons from mortality tables (qx, period/cohort, select/ultimate) and Chain-Ladder/Mack reserving through GLM/GAM frequency–severity and Tweedie pricing, limited-fluctuation and Bühlhmann-Straub credibility, Solvency II SCR standard formula, and IFRS 17 CSM/RA while treating triangle truncation, overfitting, and tail risk as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Acoustics Physicist. Use when a task calls for Acoustics Physicist judgment. Reasons from impedance Z=p/u, Helmholtz number kL regime, and the sonar equation SL-TL-NL+DI+PG through impedance tubes (ISO 10534), anechoic and reverberation rooms, laser vibrometry, and k-Wave/COMSOL simulation while treating edge diffraction inflating absorption above one, near-field versus far-field confusion, flanking and multipath paths, and amplifier clipping mistaken for nonlinearity as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

iFlytek Official Document Proofreading (公文校对) — detect and correct errors in Chinese text including typos, punctuation, word order, factual mistakes, sensitive content, and more (27 error types). Supports up to 220,000 characters. Use when the user wants to proofread, check, or correct Chinese text, especially official documents. Pure Python stdlib, no pip dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare evaluated runs in a retort experiment along factor dimensions. Surfaces effects of each factor, aggregates across replicates, and highlights cells that diverge qualitatively — complementing (not replacing) retort's ANOVA analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The research-domain clarification skill — find underspecified items in a thesis spec.md (prose wrong_if, universe rows without rationale, missing budget/expiry/pins, ambiguous pillars), ask the human structured questions WITH options (max 5 per round), encode the answers back into spec.md's Clarifications section, and re-evaluate checklists/thesis-quality.md after every write (Q32 bidirectional maintenance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Append-only gap closure and the cadence engine for research theses. Evaluates artifact CURRENT state (never git history, never task checkboxes) against current pins and wrong_if falsifiers, then appends a Convergence section to tasks.md re-proposing the gaps. A clean run leaves tasks.md byte-identical. Deterministic gaps (stale, invalidated) are uncapped; judgment-class gaps are capped per spec 046 Q40.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Auto 档 scenario — a soft-plan orchestrator for a complete fundamental equity research thesis: understand → financials → valuation → synthesize. The body is a soft plan (stages), not a rigid DAG; correctness is enforced by each referenced skill's own requires: preconditions, never by this plan's rigidity (Q2).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trade execution using price action setups, major trend reversal trading top and bottom, MTR failure continuation, strong bull and bear breakout trading, strong and weak channel trading strategies, trading range strategies, opening range swings, integration with gold.technical_setups for setup matching and execution planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Financial ratio analysis, profitability ratios ROE ROA ROIC, liquidity ratios current quick cash, leverage ratios debt-to-equity interest coverage, efficiency ratios asset turnover inventory turnover DSO, valuation ratios PE PB EV/EBITDA, cross-company ratio comparison, DuPont analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author the research plan — fundamentals first, trade ideas last; Constitution Check evaluated twice; Deviation Register with mandatory Expiry; emits the four side artifacts (brief/entities/reproduce/contracts). Technical (market_data_stage: early) theses MUST emit the entities.md bars schema before implement (Q42).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LBO model, leveraged buyout, private equity acquisition, sources and uses, debt schedule, returns waterfall, sponsor IRR, MOIC calculation, PE exit analysis, LBO valuation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative stock screening, forward-looking valuation outlier detection, backward-looking financial statement validation, PEG ratio analysis, earnings growth profile assessment, turnaround vs value trap discrimination, data mining bias prevention

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。