2,669 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
[Code Quality] Use when you need to prove fix correctness with adversarial code proof traces — a skeptic tries to DISPROVE the fix and trace all related paths first, with confidence scoring and stack-trace-style evidence chains, so confidence is earned by surviving attack, not by confirming it works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Documentation] Use to author, audit, amend, or test-spec a business Feature Spec. The single spec skill — modes draft|init|update|audit|amend create/maintain the tech-free 8-section Feature Spec; draft authors a provisional spec from an idea/requirement (no code yet, Evidence: TBD); tests generates Section 8 TC-{FEATURE}-{NNN} test specifications; sync reconciles §8 TCs ↔ executing test code. Per-mode procedure lives in references/{author,tests,sync}.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classifies professional profiles into buyer, influencer, user, decision-maker, founder, recruiter, or other personas. Use when the user provides profiles and wants persona labels with evidence and confidence. Must not infer sensitive personal attributes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies likely duplicate profiles or companies using available record evidence. Use when the user provides a list and wants duplicate groups, match confidence, and merge recommendations. Describe records as likely duplicates unless there is an exact deterministic match.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or repair a project-local Inspector profile after INSPECTOR_PROFILE_REQUIRED, INSPECTOR_PROFILE_INCOMPLETE, INSPECTOR_PROFILE_INVALID, or PROFILE_AUTHORING_REQUIRED, using Unity component source, custom Inspector evidence, serialized surfaces, and validation diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof, repair-loop routing, consumer/producer owner-boundary routing, command surface evolution, evolutionary simplicity (see references/evolutionary-simplicity.md), or a repo ecology pass to decide what should be compressed, merged, removed, updated, created, retired, or moved to checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains repo-local action contracts and harness repositories where product CLI and MCP adapters stay thin over core libraries. Use when adopting or improving steward.yaml actions, capability-level adoption evidence, cold-start proof loops, probes, benchmarks, CLI/MCP/core parity, adapter refactors, packages/core boundaries, or sibling harness layout; use repo-quality-system-lifecycle first for general app/library/tool stewardship baselines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Critically analyze whether a product, repo, skill, plugin, harness, or architecture vision still fits the real application, user intent, implementation, evidence, and likely future direction. Use when asked to assess vision vs application, predict future fit, critique roadmap direction, analyze strategic intent, or decide whether to keep, refine, pivot, or kill a plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master orchestration for repository governance, North Star impact, sub-Star boundaries, and repair-first or evidence-first drift checks. Guides an agent through the complete lifecycle of making architectural decisions, documenting them, writing FAQs, and cleaning up stale plans while adhering strictly to repo ethics and brand tone. Use whenever you need to make a structural change, write an ADR, update the doc lattice, or govern repository architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-level WeChat article drafting workflow for turning source materials, repo intakes, product notes, screenshots, or existing markdown into a publishable Chinese公众号 draft. Use for writing, rewriting, evidence-gating, title options, platform adaptation, and image planning before optional publishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NLM PubTator3 实体级关系挖掘原子 skill — 在 PubMed 文献里检索"疾病-药物-基因-化学品-突变-物种-细胞系"的标注与关系三元组。当用户问"BTK 与肺曲霉病的关联文献"、"BTK 抑制剂(MeSH D000077180)在哪些研究被讨论"、"标注这些 PMID 中提到的所有疾病/药物/基因实体"、"ibrutinib 的 MeSH/DrugBank ID"、"voriconazole 与 CYP2C19 药物-基因相互作用"、"BRAF V600E 突变 / rs113488022 检索"、"实体共现 / co-mention / 关系挖掘 / 实体规范化 / NER / annotation / entity normalization / disease-gene association / drug-gene interaction / chemical-disease relation" 时使用。无需 API key,跨平台稳定。**实体级 + 关系级**定位 — 不做综合文献检索(走 pubmed-eutils / europepmc-search)、不做全文段落抽取(走 bioc-fulltext-fetch)、不做证据等级排序(走 medical-evidence-grading)。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Europe PMC RESTful Web Service 多源文献聚合检索原子 skill。一次调用同时召回 PubMed + PMC + AGRICOLA + CABI + 预印本(bioRxiv / medRxiv / ChemRxiv 等)+ 灰色文献,自动按 PMID/PMCID/DOI 三级去重,返回完整元数据(含全文 OA 链接、citations metadata、grants 资助信息)。当任务出现 Europe PMC、多源文献聚合、广召回、RAG 检索、预印本搜索、bioRxiv、medRxiv、全文链接、DOI 检索、跨库去重、灰色文献、资助检索 等触发词时使用。**定位**:广召回 · 多源聚合 · RAG 友好(与 pubmed-eutils 互补——后者做精准官方源、Clinical Queries;本 skill 做"撒网"式广召回)。**不做**:NCBI E-utilities 直检(交给 pubmed-eutils)、临床试验(clinical-trials-v2)、全文 XML 抽取(bioc-fulltext-fetch)、实体识别(pubtator-entity-search)、证据分级(medical-evidence-grading)。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use FIRST when user requests any disease market sizing report (e.g. "做 X 市场调研" / "Run market sizing for X"). Elicits 4-6 startup questions (evidence window, geography, international comparison, report depth, user role) and writes .cache/<slug>/contract.json. ALWAYS invoke before disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Validates against schemas/contract.schema.json.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 Turn 1 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Generates report HTML with mandatory citation anchors per fact claim. Reads contract + staging + sources/. Every drug/treatment/stat/recommendation MUST carry [pmid:.../guideline:.../nct:...] anchor that resolves to an actual file in sources/. NEVER hardcode drug names or numerical claims. Use AFTER evidence recall (phase 3), BEFORE content-verification-layer (Turn 2).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for Electron desktop application implementation, local packaging, and macOS Electron installer builds in GitHub Actions. Covers secure IPC, preload and multi-process architecture, electron-builder/Forge configuration, native modules, signing/notarization setup, DMG/ZIP packaging, mounted packaged smoke, and macOS qualification evidence. For cloud releases, this Skill owns macOS build and qualification; use github-desktop-release for Windows GitHub Actions qualification and for shared artifact promotion, GitHub Release publication, resume, or authoritative readback. Do not use this Skill to build or qualify Windows installers in GitHub Actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess web applications against OWASP WSTG and OWASP Top 10 with reproducible evidence capture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
INTERNAL sub-agent, not a user-facing skill. Performs context-isolated nine-dimension rubric scoring for cheat-score, cheat-predict, and cheat-bump. Accepts only script and rubric-note paths, returns strict JSON, and refuses post-publish evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and optimize a skill system with evidence. Use for skill architecture, token or context waste, role and prompt boundaries, routing hits or misfires, plugin packaging, registry/docs/source drift, duplicate workflows, or deciding whether a reusable change belongs in a skill. Runs deterministic checks first and applies only authorized, minimal fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack investigation method for bugs, incidents, failing tests, regressions, and unclear behavior where evidence and root cause should precede fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only first workflow for diagnosing application incidents by collecting service, log, network, configuration, and functional evidence before proposing any fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run user-authorized black-box web security tests and evidence-based reports. Use for 黑盒安全测试、渗透测试、数据泄露、未授权访问、公开 JS/API、登录爆破防护、CORS 或安全响应头检查。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。