「iso」の検索結果

Use when running or wiring OpenScientist for AI Gene Review gene-function hypotheses, especially blinded comparisons against local bioinformatics analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions against a persistent markdown wiki and optionally file the answer back into the wiki. Use this when the user asks what their wiki says about a topic, wants a comparison across notes, or wants citations grounded in the wiki.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

date-fns patterns for TypeScript - formatting, parsing, manipulation, comparison, timezone handling, and internationalization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit technical, on-page, and AI-search SEO for pages, sites, and content. Use when the user asks for `/seo-audit`, `/ai-seo`, SEO review, keyword targeting, heading structure, metadata, internal linking, content gaps, AEO, GEO, LLMO, or competitor SEO comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a vague Prisma Next prompt to the right specific skill. Use for "help me with Prisma Next", "what is Prisma Next", "explain Prisma Next", "I'm new to PN", "where do I start", "what can I do with Prisma Next", "what can I do next with Prisma", "just ran createprisma", "tour of Prisma Next", "Prisma Next overview", and comparison questions like "Prisma Next vs Prisma 7", "PN vs Drizzle", "PN vs Kysely", "PN vs TypeORM". Do NOT use when the prompt clearly matches a workflow skill — adoption / quickstart / first-touch orientation / brownfield introspection, schema / contract editing, migration authoring (db update / migration plan / migrate), migration review on deploy / concurrent migrations, queries / db.orm / db.sql / TypedSQL, runtime / db.ts / middleware wiring, build / Vite plugin / Next.js plugin, debug / structured error envelopes / PN-* error codes, or feedback / bug report / feature request — load that sibling skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Top-level orchestrator for the Gaia Skill Tree evidence verification pipeline. Run this when you want to do a full evidence pass — collecting raw sources, verifying live GitHub star counts, running Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, adversarially auditing for quality/formatting issues, and checking that every URL is reachable — all in one coordinated sequence. Trigger phrases: "run the evidence pipeline", "full evidence pass", "verify evidence", "evidence verification pipeline", "run ev-pipeline", "check all evidence", "audit the data lake", "evidence quality sweep", "refresh evidence", "validate evidence sources". Also aliased as /evidence-verification-pipeline. Use the individual sub-skills (ev-collection, ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, ev-link-validation) only when you need to re-run one phase in isolation; for end-to-end work, always start here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 3 of the feature-pipeline suite. Run this after /fp-implement has pushed all commits and printed the M2 stop hook. Spawns a sandboxed sub-agent (HEAVIER) in an isolated worktree to run RED/GREEN tests against the PR diff and post a structured review comment. Use when you need an independent agent to verify correctness of implementation changes before CI runs — especially for schema mutations, CLI surface changes, or doc-touching commits. Triggers on: "review the PR", "run sandbox review", "fp-review", "Phase 3", "check the implementation", "validate the changes", "run tests on the PR", or any instruction to verify what /fp-implement just pushed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI design and implementation for real product surfaces with taste-first critique, reference routing, project-specific design briefs, variation comparison, and implementation verification. Use when Codex should redesign, build, polish, or critique frontend UI by reading project context, exploring taste, routing through `references/catalog.md`, synthesizing `PROJECT_DESIGN.md` or `design.md`, using investment gates to avoid wrong taste/reference/scope, implementing in the existing stack, and evaluating whether the result is actually better. Best for app screens, dashboards, landing pages, query tools, product surfaces, and design explorations; not for backend-only work or tiny cosmetic edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate one or more standalone Meta image-ad creatives via ChatGPT Image 2 (gpt-image-2) through the Novoads API. Locks the model, auto-strips platform chrome, enforces edge-safe layouts and glyph-safety inside body text. Use when the user asks for a "gpt-image-2 ad", "ChatGPT Image ad", "Image 2 ad creative", "make a static image ad with GPT", or anchors on a need for typography-heavy / dense-text / UI-mimicry ad creatives (chat threads, comparison tables, fake search results, iOS dialogs, Slack snapshots, ChatGPT-conversation ads, Apple Notes lists). Does NOT trigger on Nano Banana cues — use nano-banana-image-ad for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revise an already accepted article, essay, paper, statement, or manuscript under strict minimal-change constraints while still satisfying reviewer comments, supervisor feedback, or requested edits. Use when the user asks for minimal edits, smallest necessary changes, preserve the current voice, keep the existing style, avoid broad rewriting, or implement requested revisions without unnecessary polishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bypasses anti-VM and sandbox checks during analysis by locating the specific detection routines (artifact strings, timing, CPUID/hypervisor bit) and planning patches or environment hardening so the sample detonates. Activates for requests to bypass anti-VM checks, defeat sandbox detection, or make an evasive sample run for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stand up a fast, cached, isolated, disposable macOS CI lane on Tart — layered golden VM images, ephemeral per-job GitHub Actions runners, host-mounted caches, and a reusable per-repo vm-image manifest. Use when setting up VM-based CI for Pulp or generalizing it to another repo, building/refreshing golden images, wiring ephemeral runners, or debugging the VM lane.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and maintain browser demos of Pulp audio plugins (both web ABIs — WAM and WCLAP) from one declarative config, so every demo mounts the SAME shared player and the two ABIs stay in lockstep. Invoke it whenever you publish/update a browser demo of a Pulp plugin, add a plugin to a demo gallery, stand up a new gallery, or touch demo pages/hosting. It runs a deterministic generator (config → stamped WAM+WCLAP site + owned-files manifest) and a blocking validator (config schema, cross-origin-isolation coverage, OG metadata, regeneration ownership). Customization is declarative config in <repo>/.pulp-web-demo/config.json (schema bundled) plus at most two typed module seams; the shared player (pinned @danielraffel/web-player) holds all UX behavior and is never vendored. Works in Claude and Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare files, text, and data effectively with diff strategies, semantic comparison, and review workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging: reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, verify — with tooling for hard bugs. Use when stuck on a bug, flaky failure, or production incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic contract review assistance — clause extraction, risk flagging, and comparison — use when analyzing agreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map security controls across frameworks — one control set satisfying ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST, PCI DSS, and more.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bayesian data analysis — priors, likelihoods, posterior computation, model comparison, and honest reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect persistent, searchable memory for agents — episodic, semantic, and procedural stores with retrieval, consolidation, and forgetting policies. Use when designing how an agent remembers across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive social media operations for B2B SaaS brand building and engagement. Use this skill to develop LinkedIn strategy, decide whether to run a LinkedIn newsletter and how to scope it, capture consented registrations from LinkedIn Events, check LinkedIn Live eligibility, manage Twitter/X presence, create YouTube content, engage on Reddit communities, decide whether and how to answer on Quora, build community, develop influencer and creator partnerships, vet a creator before paying them, start or fix a B2B podcast, book podcast guests and guest appearances, judge whether a podcast is worth appearing on when you cannot audit its numbers, write show notes and transcripts, run social listening (what are people saying about us, share of voice, brand monitoring, validated sentiment, alert thresholds, routing signals to the right owner), and execute organic social campaigns. Also triggers on: LinkedIn, LinkedIn newsletter, LinkedIn Events, LinkedIn Live, event registration form, subscribe to our newsletter on LinkedIn, marketing consent checkbox, Notify Employees, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, community, influencer, creator partnerships, influencer vetting, engagement rate, fake followers, engagement pods, FTC disclosure, sponsored post disclosure, media kit, social media strategy, organic social, employee advocacy, podcast, podcast strategy, podcast guesting, how do I know if this podcast has real listeners, the host says they get 50k downloads, is this podcast worth going on, podcast RSS feed research, IAB podcast measurement certification, Listen Score, Apple Podcasts reviews, show notes, audiogram, episode transcript, social media account access, who has admin on our LinkedIn page, the person who ran our social accounts left, locked out of our company account, social media offboarding, YouTube channel owner, Slack primary owner, social account MFA, social media approval workflow, pause all scheduled posts, social listening, what are people saying about us, brand monitoring, brand mentions, share of voice, social share of voice vs competitors, sentiment analysis, is our sentiment dashboard accurate, listening query, boolean query, mention alerts, spike alert, CrowdTangle replacement, Reddit API access, which platforms can our listening tool see, someone on Reddit asked for a tool like ours, comment mining, voice of customer from social.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Playwright-first strategy for shared DB + shared test accounts. Use when E2E tests collide in QA/staging, need safe parallelism, or require deterministic cleanup without touching baseline data. Covers per-test ownership, namespacing, ID-based teardown, serial shared-state suites, and optional stale-data janitor jobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic 4-phase debugging framework for Unity projects with GameDebug wrapper generation. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes. Triggers on requests like "this doesn't work", "there's a bug", "it crashes when", "fix this error", "why is this happening", "null reference exception", "test is failing", "unexpected behavior", "something broke", or any debugging task. Four-phase framework (gather evidence, isolate, hypothesize, fix) that ensures understanding before attempting solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up or reviewing Storybook component documentation, design-system presentation, isolated component state previews, stories, addons, decorators, MDX docs, component-state interaction checks, visual baselines, or Chromatic. For real-browser cross-page journeys or broader coverage planning, choose the matching testing workflow first; Chinese triggers include Storybook, component documentation, Design System, visual regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Engineering Technologist/Technician — verifying field meter calibration before a sampling event, computing a flow-proportional composite sampling program, checking chain-of-custody entries against 40 CFR 136 holding times, running an air-monitoring isokinetic sampling check, or deciding whether a field QC exception invalidates a sample.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。