2.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generates video production plans including shot lists, scripts, B-roll suggestions, music mood, thumbnail concepts, and platform-specific specs for reels, YouTube, and video ads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate TAM, SAM, and SOM for new market segments using top-down and bottom-up methods
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape gig platforms and communities for leads matching agency services
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor competitor blogs and industry publications to surface content opportunities
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
On-page SEO optimization for existing content with before/after scoring
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured creative briefs for ad designers with brand-consistent direction
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract warm prospects from competitor and industry post engagers across LinkedIn, Twitter, and blogs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates platform-native social media posts for LinkedIn, X/Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit. Supports thought leadership, case study snippets, hot takes, engagement questions, carousel outlines, and threads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define and refine ICP segments with persona cards and validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-time CRM initialization. Reads agency.config.json, creates Google Sheet tabs with correct headers, and deploys the webhook Apps Script. Run this once after agency-setup to bootstrap your CRM.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Framework-based cold email composer with 3 personalization tiers. Generates subject line, body, and follow-up variants. Never uses templates -- builds from frameworks (PAS, BAB, AIDA, Signal-Proof-Ask).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end form handling with react-hook-form, Zod schemas, validation patterns, error messaging, field arrays, and multi-step wizards. Use for complex forms, validation architecture, autosave, field dependencies. Activate on "form validation", "react-hook-form", "Zod", "form error", "multi-step form", "wizard". NOT for simple HTML forms, backend validation only, or non-React frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analytical methods for decomposing expert performance into cognitive and physical task components
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a "current product focus receipt" (Decision/Now/Why-now/Evidence/Not-now/Cut-suspend/First-visible-proof/ Acceptance-gate/Kill-revisit-trigger/Owner/Review-date) and the work order it gates state a real, testable decision and a real agent launch — not planning-placeholder prose that sounds like an assignment but can't be proven. Use when deciding whether to launch an agent chain against a milestone or a stated "focus," when a work order lacks explicit input/output/owner/proof-gate, or when an acceptance gate would only prove a cached UI state instead of daemon truth. NOT for distinguishing roadmap items from energy-driven sidequests (legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), reviewing a PRD/prototype for product-completeness gaps like cold start or pricing (product-reality-reviewer), or accepting already-finished work against a personal acceptance bar (port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft professional emails for various contexts including business, technical, and customer communication. Use when the user needs help writing emails or composing professional messages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FIPA standard library of agent interaction protocols for structured multi-agent communication
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running analytical SQL over Parquet/CSV/JSON without a warehouse, replacing pandas for data wrangling, joining S3 data in-place, building local data marts, or embedding OLAP into an app. Triggers: read_parquet/read_csv setup, partitioned dataset queries, hive partitioning, glob patterns for S3, COPY TO export, attach Postgres/MySQL, UDFs in Python/R, MotherDuck cloud sync, columnar performance vs row stores. NOT for OLTP workloads (concurrent writes), distributed analytics at petabyte scale (use Spark/Trino), or vector search (use pgvector/Lance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FIPA standard for agent platform management including lifecycle, directory, and communication services
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafting and iterating sections of The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor (local identity) and Bonded Commons (local coordination), extending coordination across machines and administrative domains. Use when authoring a section, rewriting a section after a redteam/whitehat round, or composing a new chapter. NOT for marketing copy, NOT for the other two papers, NOT for production threat response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
S3, multipart uploads, CDN integration, and presigned URLs for file storage. Activate on: file upload, S3, presigned URL, multipart upload, CDN, blob storage, image upload, media storage. NOT for: data warehouse storage (use lakehouse-architect), database design (use dimensional-modeler).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defensive counterpart to federated-harbor-redteam: closes the smells that red team opens against The Federated Harbor whitepaper. Federation-specific defenses for cross-harbor primitives — mechanization commitments, scope hedges, cross-paper dependency formalization, pre-emptive analogies (CT, Macaroons, atomic swaps), and defense-in-depth framing (refuses vs prices). Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-redteam. NOT for ad-hoc code review, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use whitehat-defense).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial reviewer for The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor and Bonded Commons. Probes federation-specific threats: trust transitivity, cross-harbor token forgery, federated revocation under partition, cross-harbor Sybil, cross-domain settlement, equivocation, bond-pool draining, cold-start joining, federation-operator Sybil. Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-whitehat. NOT for incident response, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use redteam-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。