「data flow」の検索結果

Hunt Host Header Injection — password reset poisoning → ATO, web cache poisoning via unkeyed Host/X-Forwarded-Host, routing-based SSRF (Host picks upstream → cloud metadata/internal services), path-override SSRF/ACL-bypass (X-Original-URL/X-Rewrite-URL), OAuth redirect_uri/issuer poisoning, and absolute-URL link poisoning in emails. High to Critical when it reaches ATO or mass cache poisoning. Built on public Host-header research (PortSwigger 'Practical web cache poisoning' + James Kettle, and the classic password-reset-poisoning class). Use on any forgot-password flow, CDN/reverse-proxy-fronted app, OAuth/OIDC endpoint, or absolute-URL-in-email feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured OSINT methodology framework: target definition, source selection, collection workflows, data correlation, timeline reconstruction, and reporting. Use to guide systematic OSINT campaigns or teach OSINT methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic bug identification methodology: source code review patterns, black-box testing strategies, taint analysis, dangerous function hunting, data flow tracing, and automated scanning setup. Use for code audits, bug bounty triage, or building vulnerability identification pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation ...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Send personalized LinkedIn direct messages to a list of existing 1st-degree connections via browser automation. Use when the user wants to message LinkedIn connections with AI-personalized outreach — e.g. nurturing leads, following up after events, reconnecting with contacts, or announcing something. Takes a data file (CSV/TSV) or plain list with connection names and companies, asks for outreach context/goal, generates a tailored message per person, and sends each one via browser automation. Handles message compose flow, character limits, and incremental status tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query BondTerminal API using x402 keyless payments. No API key needed — pay $0.01 USDC per request on Base mainnet. Use when users ask for Argentine bond data, analytics, cashflows, history, riesgo país, or ISIN/ticker lookups (e.g. AL30, GD30, US040114HS26). Supports automatic 402 → payment → retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive quality verification: spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。