「drive」の検索結果

Build interactive live slide decks with Vite + React 19, TanStack Router, WebGPU shaders, Framer Motion orchestration, 1920x1080, access-gated SPA. 39 components (layout, interaction, graphics, chrome, navigation), direction-aware slide transitions, presenter mode with speaker notes and BroadcastChannel sync, Playwright PNG/PDF export, YAML-driven authoring, Cloudflare/Vercel/Netlify deploy. Triggers on: slide deck, presentation, pitch deck, investor deck, product demo, conference talk, live slides, WebGPU slides, interactive presentation, presenter mode, speaker notes, overwatch deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate hand-crafted web animation patterns as self-contained HTML: typewriter/rotator effects, progress bar simulations, file review state machines, staggered reveals, terminal status displays, streaming AI-response demos, popover/dialog/toast lifecycles, Lottie orchestration, scroll-driven sequences. Behavioral animations that simulate live software. Triggers on typewriter effect, progress animation, stagger reveal, terminal animation, streaming text, AI demo animation, toast animation, data simulation, product demo animation, loading sequence, conductor motion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert coding skill for the full MapTiler platform — Cloud REST APIs, MapTiler SDK JS (built on MapLibre GL JS), native mobile SDKs, on-premise infrastructure, and vector tile schemas. USE WHEN the user wants to add a map to a web or mobile app, show locations or routes, display geographic data, build a store locator, create data visualizations on maps, add geocoding or address search, do reverse geocoding, look up elevation, do IP geolocation, fetch weather data, transform coordinates between CRS/EPSG, embed static map images, work with vector tilesets (Planet v4, Buildings, Contours, Outdoor, Ocean, Landcover, Cadastre), write MapLibre style expressions or data-driven styling, render 3D terrain, globe view, or 3D buildings extrusion, use satellite imagery, add markers, popups, heatmaps, or clustering, integrate maps in React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, Next.js, Leaflet, OpenLayers, Cesium, or deck.gl, build native maps on iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin), Flutter, or React Native, self-host with MapTiler Server or generate tiles with MapTiler Engine CLI, or upload/manage tilesets via the Admin API. Also USE WHEN the user mentions MapLibre GL JS — the SDK extends MapLibre with built-in cloud services, helpers, and session billing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate SEO, LLM-readable site architecture, UX, content, monitoring, security, and external authority work as a task-plan-driven sequence. Use this skill when the user asks to plan, execute, validate, or route multi-skill website growth work; asks what to do next across semantic core, URL structure, internal linking, schema, llms.txt, UX journeys, analytics, citation monitoring, or white-hat link placement; or wants a central architect that preserves evidence, alarms, handoffs, and tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent re-derivation gate for proposed changes during autonomous execution. Evaluates a change (code diff, config edit, engine evolution, schema change) against the work's authority matrix and a 4-check protocol: invariant compliance, scope authorization, detection narrowness, and regression risk. Returns structured JSON with pass/fail per check, an overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT), and blockers. Profile-driven thresholds (strict for unattended runs, lenient for desk supervision). Use when an autonomous agent proposes an engine change, when reviewing a Claude Code-authored modification before merge, or when an unattended profile requires independent re-derivation. Trigger on: "review/approve this proposed change," "critic-gate this," "is this change safe," "is this safe to merge," "should I let this land," "run the critic." Do NOT use for handoff-readiness checks (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), general code review, or design-time correctness. Authority matrix required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects the active profile from triggering context. Evaluates a rule set against inputs (current time, calendar state, geofence, manual command, custom signals) and returns the profile name that consuming Skills (handoff-trigger-check, critic-gate, future Skills) should apply. Configuration-driven; rule set lives in a router config file conforming to the included schema. Deterministic precedence — manual override beats calendar beats time-window beats default. Required default profile guarantees a routing decision always exists. Use when an orchestrator needs to pick a profile automatically rather than having the caller specify one, when wiring calendar/time/Telegram triggers to gate behavior, or when a Skill's behavior should change with availability mode. Trigger on: "what profile should I use," "route to a profile," "which mode am I in," "auto-select profile," "active mode," "current profile." Do NOT use to evaluate work readiness or review proposed changes. Always returns a profile name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct a claim-driven research experiment project from post-Idea intake through method realization, prioritized evidence collection, Human Gates, and Evidence Freeze. Use for scientific planning, state transitions, queues, budgets, or recovery; not for running code or independently auditing results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardized commit + PR workflow for tbh-meter. Analyzes changes, makes conventional commits (subjects feed the release changelog), and for any overlay/UI change captures a seed-driven screenshot to attach to the PR. Use when asked to commit, open a PR, or "commit this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boot and drive the tbh-meter app + reader locally to see a change working — what runs on macOS (UI only; the reader is win32-only) and how to feed the overlay/list fake data. Use when asked to run/start the meter, verify a change in the running app, screenshot the overlay, or reproduce a bug locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to write, rewrite, review, or critique commercial copy meant to drive a reader toward action — landing pages, hero sections, headlines, email (cold outreach, nurture, promo, launch), CTAs, microcopy, product descriptions, value propositions, ads, or taglines. Also for copy audits, clarity checks, conversion reviews, or choosing a framework (AIDA, PAS, BAB, FAB, 4U's). Applies even when the user just says "write me an email" or "review this page." Not for channel/budget strategy (use channel-expert) or pricing structure (use pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is deciding, reviewing, or second-guessing a software architecture or tech-stack choice — monolith vs microservices vs serverless vs event-driven, backend language, database type, caching, CQRS/event sourcing, polyglot, or a migration like Strangler Fig. Triggers on "should I use microservices", "which database", "tech stack for", "system design", or "architecture review". For how to deploy, operate, and scale that design (CI/CD, cloud, Kubernetes, IaC), use devops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute chaos engineering experiments using Litmus or Chaos Mesh. Test system resilience through controlled fault injection, validate hypothesis-driven tests, and improve failure recovery. Use before major product launches, after architecture changes to validate resilience, during GameDays or disaster recovery drills, to validate assumptions about failure modes, or as part of an SRE maturity program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a multi-stop tour route with waypoint optimization, drive/walk time estimation, and POI discovery along the route using OSM data. Covers geocoding, nearest-neighbor and TSP-based ordering, time/distance matrix calculation, and itinerary generation with points of interest. Use when planning a road trip or walking tour with multiple destinations, optimizing visit order to minimize travel time, discovering sites along a route, or comparing driving versus walking versus public transport options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute A/B tests for ML models in production using traffic splitting, statistical significance testing, and canary/shadow deployment strategies. Measure performance differences and make data-driven decisions about model rollout. Use when validating a new model version before full rollout, comparing candidate models trained with different algorithms, measuring business metric impact of model changes, or when regulatory requirements mandate gradual rollout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret Raman spectra to identify molecular vibrations, assess polarizability-driven selection rules, compare with complementary IR data, and evaluate depolarization ratios for symmetry assignment. Covers Raman-active mode identification, fluorescence interference mitigation, and reference spectrum matching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement GitOps continuous delivery using Argo CD or Flux with app-of-apps pattern, automated sync policies, drift detection, and multi-environment promotion. Manage Kubernetes deployments declaratively from Git with automated reconciliation. Use when implementing declarative infrastructure management, migrating from imperative kubectl commands to Git-driven deployments, setting up multi-environment promotion workflows, enforcing code review gates for production, or meeting audit and compliance requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish Service Level Objectives (SLO), Service Level Indicators (SLI), and Service Level Agreements (SLA) with error budget tracking, burn rate alerts, and automated reporting using Prometheus and tools like Sloth or Pyrra. Use when defining reliability targets for customer-facing services, balancing feature velocity against system reliability through error budgets, migrating from arbitrary uptime goals to data-driven metrics, or implementing Site Reliability Engineering practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply collective intelligence coordination patterns — stigmergy, local rules, and quorum sensing — to organize distributed systems, teams, or workflows without centralized control. Covers signal design, agent autonomy boundaries, emergent behavior cultivation, and feedback loop tuning. Use when designing distributed systems without a coordination bottleneck, organizing teams that must self-coordinate, building event-driven architectures with shared state communication, or replacing fragile centralized orchestration with resilient emergent coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture outbound HTTP and telemetry from a CLI harness at runtime. Covers capture-channel selection (transcript file vs verbose-fetch stderr vs outbound proxy vs on-disk state), hook-driven per-event capture vs long-running session capture, JSONL output format for diff-friendly artifacts, and the observability table that maps each target to the cheapest channel that captures it. Use when a static finding needs runtime confirmation, when a payload shape is needed for a client re-implementation, or when dark-vs-live disambiguation requires watching what the binary actually sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PHPUnit and Pest patterns for any PHP project: test structure, naming, data providers, test doubles (mocks/stubs/fakes), fixtures, and coverage targets. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every PHP plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Structure unit and integration tests with PHPUnit or Pest consistently. - Drive cases with data providers / datasets instead of copy-pasted test bodies. - Use test doubles with discipline — mock collaborators, not the system under test. - Set up and tear down fixtures cleanly and aim for a meaningful coverage target. Do NOT use this skill for: - PHP language idioms — see php-foundation:php-conventions. - Composer / autoloading — see php-foundation:composer-tooling. - Framework-specific test helpers (Laravel RefreshDatabase/actingAs, Symfony WebTestCase/KernelTestCase) — those are injected by the framework plugin's QA phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a world the human drives until how a thing behaves is intuitive. Use when the user needs to hold how something behaves and reading has not made it intuitive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。