「edge」の検索結果

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RAG & Knowledge Architect: Retrieval systems: ingestion, chunking, embeddings, hybrid search, reranking, evals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys React/Vite applications to Alibaba Cloud ESA Pages. Use when the user needs to deploy frontend applications, manage deployments, configure custom domains, or troubleshoot deployment issues on ESA (Edge Security Acceleration) platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical documentation specialist and knowledge curator. Use when the user asks to talk to Paige or requests the tech writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate accurate, runnable quantitative strategy code for the JoinQuant (聚宽) platform. Use this skill when the user asks to write a stock/ETF/futures backtest, paper-trading, or live-trading strategy on JoinQuant — the skill provides progressive-disclosure access to the complete JoinQuant API knowledge base (14 categories, 294KB official docs), 5 production-ready strategy templates (single-stock MA, multi-factor, ETF rotation, momentum, mean-reversion), and a lint tool that catches hallucinated APIs, future-function violations, and unset price-mode/slippage/commission. Chinese-friendly. Code generated by this skill should paste directly into the JoinQuant online editor without modification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-implementation red-team analysis. Use when a plan is high-risk, critical path, or expensive to reverse. Challenges plans before code is written — finds edge cases, security holes, scalability bottlenecks, error propagation risks, and integration conflicts. Catches flaws at plan time (10x cheaper than post-implementation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web search and external knowledge lookup. Gathers data on technologies, libraries, best practices, and competitor solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent review loop run before delivery in code work. An independent reviewer (Codex, or fresh Codex-style subagents) reads the whole PR against the approved outcome; the lead fixes in-scope functional findings and re-reviews until none remain. Its differentiator is independence and exhaustiveness — a reviewer that fails differently from the authors, run to clean — distinct from the recursive-refinement ladder. Invoked by the team lead from the unified pre-ship gate (code-mode and /swarm:refine) after the ship steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-platform Chinese & multilingual TTS text-to-speech via Edge/Doubao/CosyVoice/Qwen3/StepFun/GLM-TTS/Azure/Tencent/Baidu/MiniMax/Xunfei plus ElevenLabs/OpenAI/Google/Atlas Cloud — 15 backends, word-level timestamps, [PAUSE:x] pause markers, pinyin pronunciation overrides

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, deepen, validate, index, and maintain a private hierarchical career knowledge graph from supplied career materials. Use when the user asks to create or update a VitaeGraph, model education with nested courses or thesis work, enrich projects from Git repositories, or supply deep selected career context to another VitaeContext skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintainer-only skill for refreshing VitaeContext wiki knowledge from official sources. Use only from a local repository clone when a maintainer asks to refresh one module, audit all module wiki entries, or audit module source lists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements React Flow node-based UIs correctly using @xyflow/react. Use when building flow charts, diagrams, visual editors, or node-based applications with React. Covers nodes, edges, handles, custom components, state management, and viewport control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews iOS animation code for correctness, performance, accessibility, and Apple API best practices. Use when reviewing .swift files containing animation code — withAnimation, .animation(), PhaseAnimator, KeyframeAnimator, matchedGeometryEffect, navigationTransition, CABasicAnimation, CASpringAnimation, UIViewPropertyAnimator, UIDynamicAnimator, symbolEffect, scrollTransition, contentTransition, or custom Transition conformances.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write Swift animation code using Apple's latest frameworks — SwiftUI animations, Core Animation, and UIKit. Prefer first-party APIs over third-party libraries. Use when implementing iOS animations, writing animation code, building transitions, creating gesture-driven interactions, or converting animation specs/designs into working Swift code. Covers iOS 18 through iOS 26 APIs including KeyframeAnimator, PhaseAnimator, custom Transition protocol, zoom navigation transitions, matchedGeometryEffect, symbol effects, mesh gradients, and SwiftUI-UIKit animation bridging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements stateful agent graphs using LangGraph. Use when building graphs, adding nodes/edges, defining state schemas, implementing checkpointing, handling interrupts, or creating multi-agent systems with LangGraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LangGraph code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses StateGraph, nodes, edges, checkpointing, or other LangGraph features. Catches common mistakes in state management, graph structure, and async patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review knowledge base: quality, security (OWASP Top 10), error-handling, performance, and test-coverage checklists with severity-ranked output format. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or before commits. Loaded automatically by the code-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Codex's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quellenbasierte Profile einzelner Wettbewerber aus öffentlichen Informationen erstellen. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn Positionierung, Zielgruppe, Produkt, Preise, Organisation und Belegbehauptungen eines Anbieters zusammengetragen werden sollen, als Kurzbrief, fokussiertes Profil oder vertiefte Recherche. Trennt Tatsache, Anbieterangabe, Schätzung und Hypothese in einem Claim-Ledger, hält Quellen mit Datum fest und beachtet Datenschutz, Datenbankrechte, Urheberrecht und Geschäftsgeheimnisse. Kein Scraping über das Freigegebene hinaus, keine Personendossiers. Für vergleichende Seiten: competitors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous novel writing CLI agent with web workbench (JiaOS Studio) - use for creative fiction writing, standalone short-fiction packages, cover generation, novel generation, style imitation, chapter continuation/import, EPUB export, AIGC detection, and fan fiction. Native English support with 10 built-in English genre profiles (LitRPG, Progression Fantasy, Isekai, Cultivation, System Apocalypse, Dungeon Core, Romantasy, Sci-Fi, Tower Climber, Cozy Fantasy). Also supports Chinese web novel genres (xuanhuan, xianxia, urban, horror, other). Multi-agent pipeline, two-phase writer (creative + settlement), stronger long-form chapter craft rules, hook-ledger payoff checks, 33-dimension auditing, token usage analytics, creative brief input, structured logging (JSON Lines), multi-model routing, custom OpenAI-compatible provider support, and JiaOS Studio web UI for visual book management, short-fiction runs, cover generation, chapter review, real-time writing progress, market radar, and analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, restructure, classify, and review documentation with the Diataxis framework. Use when the user asks to create, improve, audit, or reorganize documentation of any kind: knowledge bases, help centers, onboarding guides, process docs, manuals, runbooks, product or API docs, tutorials, how-to guides, references, explanations. Also use when the user mentions Diataxis, docs taxonomy, or documentation architecture, or asks why a document feels confusing. Also use for Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) or controlled-language rewrites of English technical docs. Not for marketing, legal, sales, press, or fiction writing unless the user wants a Diataxis-style analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。