「existing」の検索結果

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude prompts based on task characteristics. Trigger on: "help me choose an approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my prompt feels generic," "I don't know which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vets whether to build a feature from scratch, use an existing free/open-source solution, or pay for a third-party API/service. Use this whenever the user asks Claude to implement, add, integrate, or write code for a feature or capability, especially one that sounds like it could already be a solved problem (auth, payments, scraping, animation, comment/DM automation, video/image generation, search, notifications, etc.), even if the user doesn't explicitly ask "should I build or buy this." Make sure to trigger this before writing non-trivial implementation code for any feature-level capability, not just when the user asks about libraries directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to scope, write, or audit a product spec — a PRD, feature spec, user stories, acceptance criteria, or a "spec this out"/"break this into stories"/"definition of done" request — or wants an existing spec reviewed for gaps and anti-patterns. Triggers whenever a feature idea needs to become structured requirements that align a team on what to build. For the analytics behind success metrics, use data-analysis; for the technical design, use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a B2B SaaS product needs upstream positioning or messaging clarity — defining who it's for, the category, competitive alternatives, differentiation, value props, strategic narrative, or a messaging hierarchy. Triggers include "my messaging isn't working," "we sound like everyone else," repositioning, or auditing an existing positioning doc. Use before homepage, deck, or sales-narrative work. Not for writing the final copy (use copywriter-skill) or running the sales process (use sales-skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review software architecture for coupling, cohesion, SOLID principles, API design, scalability, and technical debt. Covers system-level evaluation, architecture decision record review, and improvement recommendations. Use when evaluating a proposed architecture before implementation, assessing an existing system for scalability or security, reviewing ADRs, performing a technical debt assessment, or evaluating readiness for significant scale-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preserve and conserve library and archival materials. Covers environmental controls (temperature, humidity, light), handling procedures, book repair techniques (torn pages, loose spines, foxing), acid-free storage, digitization for preservation, and disaster recovery planning. Use when establishing preservation practices for a new or existing collection, when materials show signs of deterioration, when setting up environmental controls for storage, when planning digitization to preserve fragile originals, or when creating a disaster recovery plan for a library or archive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the viz pipeline to render icons from existing glyphs. Entry point for the viz subproject covering palette generation, data building, manifest creation, and icon rendering for skills, agents, and teams. Always use build.sh as the pipeline entry point — never call Rscript directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review user experience and interface design using Nielsen's heuristics, WCAG 2.1 accessibility guidelines, keyboard and screen reader audit, user flow analysis, cognitive load assessment, and form usability evaluation. Use when conducting a usability review before release, assessing WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance, evaluating user flows for efficiency, reviewing form design, or performing a heuristic evaluation of an existing interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a SKILL.md file for compliance with the agentskills.io standard. Checks YAML frontmatter fields, required sections, line count limits, procedure step format, and registry synchronization. Use when a new skill needs format validation before merge, an existing skill has been modified and requires re-validation, performing a batch audit of all skills in a domain, or reviewing a contributor's skill submission in a pull request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a new CLI command using Commander.js with options, action handler, three output modes (human-readable, quiet, JSON), and optional ceremony variant. Covers command naming, option design, shared context patterns, error handling, and integration testing. Use when adding a command to an existing Commander.js CLI, designing a new CLI tool from scratch, or standardizing command structure across a multi-command CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract the conceptual essence of a repository as skills, agents, and teams — the project's roles, procedures, and coordination patterns expressed as agentskills.io-standard definitions. Reads an arbitrary codebase and produces generalized definitions that capture WHAT the project does and WHO operates it, without replicating HOW it does it. Use when onboarding to a new codebase and wanting to understand its conceptual architecture, when bootstrapping an agentic system from an existing project, when studying a project's organizational DNA for cross-pollination, or when creating a skill/agent/team library inspired by a reference implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize, track, and value a trading card game collection. Covers inventory methods, storage best practices, grade-based valuation, want-list management, and collection analytics for Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when starting a new collection and setting up inventory tracking, cataloging an existing collection that has grown beyond casual knowledge, valuing a collection for insurance or sale, or deciding which cards to submit for professional grading based on value potential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a JSON-RPC 2.0 A2A server with full task lifecycle management (submitted/working/completed/failed/canceled/input-required), SSE streaming, and push notifications. Use when implementing an agent that participates in multi-agent A2A workflows, building a backend for an Agent Card, adding A2A protocol support to an existing agent or service, or deploying an agent that must interoperate with other A2A-compliant agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a project status report by reading existing artifacts (charter, backlog, sprint plan, WBS), calculating metrics, identifying blockers, and summarizing progress with RAG indicators for schedule, scope, budget, and quality. Use at the end of a sprint or reporting period, when stakeholders request a health update, before steering committee or governance meetings, or when a new blocker or risk materializes mid-project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing team composition by refining its structure in-place or creating a specialized variant. Covers assessing the current team against template and coordination patterns, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (adjust members, change coordination pattern, split/merge teams), applying changes to the team file and CONFIG block, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a team's member roster is outdated, coordination pattern no longer fits, user feedback reveals workflow gaps, a specialized variant is needed alongside the original, or agents have been added or removed from the library affecting team composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps, a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or related skills are added and cross-references are stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement policy-as-code enforcement using OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno to validate and mutate Kubernetes resources according to organizational policies. Covers constraint templates, admission control, audit mode, reporting violations, and integrating with CI/CD pipelines for shift-left policy validation. Use when enforcing resource configuration standards, preventing security misconfigurations such as privileged containers, ensuring compliance before deployment, standardizing naming conventions, or auditing existing cluster resources against policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。