「sign up」の検索結果

Generates Spring Boot 3.x configurations, creates REST controllers, implements Spring Security 6 authentication flows, sets up Spring Data JPA repositories, and configures reactive WebFlux endpoints. Use when building Spring Boot 3.x applications, microservices, or reactive Java applications; invoke for Spring Data JPA, Spring Security 6, WebFlux, Spring Cloud integration, Java REST API design, or Microservices Java architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and implements production-grade ML pipeline infrastructure: configures experiment tracking with MLflow or Weights & Biases, creates Kubeflow or Airflow DAGs for training orchestration, builds feature store schemas with Feast, deploys model registries, and automates retraining and validation workflows. Use when building ML pipelines, orchestrating training workflows, automating model lifecycle, implementing feature stores, managing experiment tracking systems, setting up DVC for data versioning, tuning hyperparameters, or configuring MLOps tooling like Kubeflow, Airflow, MLflow, or Prefect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and configure Laravel 10+ applications, including creating Eloquent models and relationships, implementing Sanctum authentication, configuring Horizon queues, designing RESTful APIs with API resources, and building reactive interfaces with Livewire. Use when creating Laravel models, setting up queue workers, implementing Sanctum auth flows, building Livewire components, optimising Eloquent queries, or writing Pest/PHPUnit tests for Laravel features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates Angular 17+ standalone components, configures advanced routing with lazy loading and guards, implements NgRx state management, applies RxJS patterns, and optimizes bundle performance. Use when building Angular 17+ applications with standalone components or signals, setting up NgRx stores, establishing RxJS reactive patterns, performance tuning, or writing Angular tests for enterprise apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building game systems, implementing Unity/Unreal Engine features, or optimizing game performance. Invoke to implement ECS architecture, configure physics systems and colliders, set up multiplayer networking with lag compensation, optimize frame rates to 60+ FPS targets, develop shaders, or apply game design patterns such as object pooling and state machines. Trigger keywords: Unity, Unreal Engine, game development, ECS architecture, game physics, multiplayer networking, game optimization, shader programming, game AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route gh-aw workflow design/create/debug/upgrade requests to the right prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sketch UI/design ideas with throwaway HTML mockups, or propose what to sketch next (frontier mode)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research competitor paid-ad presence, messaging, creative, formats, landing pages, keyword and auction signals, transparent ad libraries, and strategic gaps across supported platforms. Use for competitor ads, ad libraries, ad spy, competitive PPC analysis, competitor creative, Google Ads Transparency, Meta Ad Library, or paid-media competitor research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translates a contract review into a summary the business stakeholder will actually read. Not a legal memo — a two-minute answer to "can I sign this and what do I need to know." Use when user says "summarize for the business", "write this up for [stakeholder]", "explain this to procurement", "non-legal summary", or when a review is done and needs to go to someone outside legal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check open leaves for deadline alerts and required decisions. Surfaces only the leaves that require an action and explains why — not a status board. Use weekly, or whenever the attorney needs to know which leaves have upcoming designation, certification, or exhaustion deadlines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync tasks and refresh memory from your current activity. Use when pulling new assignments from your project tracker into TASKS.md, triaging stale or overdue tasks, filling memory gaps for unknown people or projects, or running a comprehensive scan to catch todos buried in chat and email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and reviews structured Lean 4 proofs and designs Lean libraries following Mathlib conventions. Use when proving theorems in Lean, formalizing mathematics or specifications in Lean 4, defining new types or definitions in a Lean library, reviewing Lean proofs for readability and maintainability, refactoring long tactic proofs into lemmas, filling in sorry placeholders in a Lean development, setting up CI or linters for a Lean project, diagnosing slow proofs or maxHeartbeats timeouts, or writing custom tactics, macros, or linters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WPA/WPA2-PSK attack methodology — four-way handshake capture via targeted deauthentication, PMKID attacks (no client required), hcxdumptool / hcxpcapngtool conversion to hashcat hc22000 format, GPU-accelerated cracking with dictionary, mask, and rule-based attacks, vendor default-PSK generators (UPC, Sky, BT, etc.), 802.11r FT key cracking, opportunistic key cache analysis, and signal-level optimization. Use when the in-scope network is WPA/WPA2 Personal — the most common consumer/SMB encryption mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Time-of-Check / Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition exploitation methodology across binary, kernel, filesystem, web, and container layers. Covers symbolic-link races (open/access/stat split), file-descriptor races, fopen/realpath traversal races, /proc and procfs races, FUSE-backed slow-fs races to widen the window, ptrace and signal races, kernel double-fetch / userspace pointer races, container/runc/symlink escape primitives, kubernetes admission/authz TOCTOU, web auth-vs-authz TOCTOU, JWT-claim TOCTOU at gateway vs service, payment/idempotency races, and modern race-amplification techniques (single-packet attack, slow loris, FUSE pause, cgroup freeze, scheduler shaping). Use when you've identified a 'check then act' pattern in code, when fuzzing for race conditions, or when exploiting concurrency bugs in privileged binaries / kernel / orchestrators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing multi-agent topologies that run ON OpenRig — authoring RigSpec and AgentSpec files for new rigs, creating agent startup content (guidance / skills / culture), or diagnosing why a launched rig's agents aren't behaving as intended. NOT for changing OpenRig itself (use developing-openrig); NOT for ordinary CLI operation of an existing rig (use openrig-user). Covers the full authoring lifecycle from user intent to validated, launchable rig.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring rig specs, agent specs, workflow specs, startup/context fragments, operating-mode declarations, or designing the user spec library. Covers the 4 failure modes (spec instantiates topology but not workflow/mode; spec depends on local paths and fails on another host; agents modify specs as one-off files instead of preserving reusable intent; validation proves YAML shape but not whether topology can run) and the validation-vs-runtime-realization distinction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run fast, source-grounded UX research on the highest-signal problems users are experiencing with a user-specified digital product. Use when the user asks to research user pain, UX friction, onboarding issues, docs/help problems, developer experience friction, support pain, product workflow issues, or current user complaints for a named product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains Figma Code Connect template files that map Figma components to code snippets. Use when the user mentions Code Connect, Figma component mapping, design-to-code translation, or asks to create/update .figma.ts or .figma.js files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply consistent photo adjustments across a set of images so they look like they were edited together. Use this skill whenever the user says "make my photos look cohesive", "give all these the same style", "apply a warm and golden feel to all of these", "make this cinematic", "match the look across my photos", "edit all my travel photos the same way", "batch edit these", "make these consistent", "fix my phone photos", or uploads a folder of photos and wants a unified, polished result. Also triggers for requests like "apply a preset to all of these", "make these look professional", or "they were shot in mixed lighting — can you fix them all". Outputs direct final image URLs plus an in-chat preview grid and optional Firefly Board link. Access: 🔐 Signed-In required | Gen AI: ❌

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, critique, route, and implement Gantt charts and schedule visualizations. Use when the user mentions Gantt charts, project schedules, roadmaps with task spans, milestones, dependencies, predecessors, critical path, baselines, WBS, resource plans, capacity timelines, MS Project, Primavera P6, Jira Advanced Roadmaps, GitHub Projects, Smartsheet, monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, Azure DevOps iterations, or importing/exporting project-management data for a timeline chart.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen existing small-molecule libraries with Boltz. Use when docking, scoring, or ranking a supplied SMILES or compound library against a target; also returns free Tier-1 ADME/ADMET (solubility, permeability, lipophilicity/logD) per molecule. Not for de novo molecule design, one-off docking, or ADME on bare SMILES with no target (use boltz-small-molecule-adme).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen existing protein binders with Boltz. Use when ranking a supplied protein, peptide, antibody, nanobody, or binder library against a target. Not for designing new proteins or screening small molecules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。