「detect」の検索結果

Редактор русского текста - убирает признаки AI-генерации, канцелярит и воду, сохраняя факты и добавляя голос. 38 паттернов AI-слопа с жёсткими запретами (негативные параллелизмы, длинное тире, математические знаки, техножаргон), детерминированным линтером и детектом артефактов копипаста из чат-ботов. Use when пользователь просит "отредактируй", "убери воду", "сделай живым", "humanize", "очисти от AI", "перепиши человечнее", говорит что текст "звучит как нейросеть", готовит AI-черновик к публикации, или спрашивает "это писала нейросеть?", "проверь на AI", "палится ли текст" (detect-режим - аудит без правки). Do NOT use for написания текста с нуля, перевода, проверки орфографии и пунктуации, нерусского текста, кода и конфигов, юридических и академических текстов (канцелярит и пассив там - жанр).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect template version drift and guide migration to the latest template version. Compares current repo against the template, identifies what's outdated, and automates safe updates while protecting product-specific content. Triggers on requests to sync with template, update template version, check for template drift, or when user asks "sync template", "update to v3", "template drift", "check template version".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists. Phase 1: validate changed files against .hoyeon/rules/ checklists and report PASS/WARN. Phase 2 (conditional): propose rule additions when unmatched patterns are detected. Essential before git push. Trigger phrases: "check", "checklist", "verify changes", "what did I miss", "pre-push check", "cascading changes", "any more changes needed", "update checklist", "update rules", "rules update", "체크", "체크리스트", "변경 확인", "빠뜨린 거 없나", "push 전 확인", "뭐 더 건드려야 해?", "연쇄 변경 확인", "규칙 갱신".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously cut a Rove (`@sma1lboy/rove`) release end-to-end — detect the semver bump from pending changesets (flagging an upstream `minor` you didn't intend), run the release gates, dispatch the Changesets workflow (or run `scripts/release.sh` locally), then poll the GitHub Actions Release workflow with `gh` until npm publish completes, diagnosing CI failures (npm token, registry 404, lint, branch mismatch) instead of leaving them silent. Use when the user says "cut a release", "ship a version", "release Rove", "release rove", "发版", "release.sh", or "bump the version". Never force-pushes; always verifies the release landed on `main`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage public/private repository pairs. Verify parity, detect drift, run sync scripts, and validate no sensitive data leaks to the public repo. Use for projects that maintain separate dev and public repositories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize GitHub repositories with standard files and configuration. Generates LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, issue/PR templates, CI config, and .gitignore. Detects project type and adapts templates accordingly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-push hygiene check for GitHub repositories. Scans for PII, secrets, and sensitive data before pushing. Audits commit messages, enforces repo-specific blocklists, and rate-limits pushes to avoid GitHub abuse detection. Use before any git push, especially to public repos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, audit, or update GitHub READMEs with project-type-aware structure, voice calibration, and SEO/AEO discoverability guidance. Three modes: generate (new), audit (check existing), update (patch). Detects repo type and adapts sections, tone, and badges accordingly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection, auto-merge candidates, labeling). Also covers creating, inspecting, and repairing a CodeScope index. Use for: code structure, who calls what, why something changed, similar functions, module boundaries, bug tracing, class relationships, PR risk/conflicts, or any question benefiting from a code knowledge graph. Applies when a `.codegraph` index exists in the workspace, or when the user wants to create one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage environment variables and secrets across development, staging, and production environments. Use when someone needs to audit env vars, sync secrets between environments, detect missing or mismatched variables, rotate credentials, or set up a new environment from an existing one. Trigger words: env vars, environment variables, secrets, .env file, dotenv, config management, secret rotation, missing variable, environment sync.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects attacks from server logs and blocks malicious IPs with CrowdSec, an open-source, crowd-sourced alternative to fail2ban. Use when a user asks to block brute force attempts, protect SSH or a web server, set up a community blocklist firewall, add a WAF, or install CrowdSec with Docker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit project dependencies for outdated packages, security vulnerabilities, and breaking changes. Use when someone asks to "check for outdated packages", "audit dependencies", "find vulnerable dependencies", "plan dependency upgrades", "detect breaking changes", or "update npm packages safely". Analyzes package.json/lock files, cross-references changelogs, and produces ordered upgrade plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate bookkeeping workflows by parsing bank statements (CSV/OFX/QIF), categorizing transactions using rules or AI, reconciling accounts, generating expense reports, and detecting duplicates. Use when: automating transaction categorization, building reconciliation pipelines, processing bank exports, or generating expense summaries without manual data entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Arcjet, the developer-first security platform that provides rate limiting, bot protection, email validation, and attack detection as a code-first SDK. Helps developers add security layers to Next.js, Node.js, and other JavaScript/TypeScript applications without managing infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AssemblyAI is a hosted speech-to-text API that transcribes audio and video files or live streams and adds speaker labels, sentiment, entity detection, PII redaction and LLM analysis of the transcript. Use when a user asks to transcribe a recording, label who said what, analyze call sentiment, redact personal data, stream live transcription, or summarize and question a transcript with LLM Gateway (the replacement for LeMUR).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production incident response - from detection through resolution to post-mortem. Effective communication, systematic investigation, and blameless learning from failuresUse when "incident, outage, production issue, site down, on-call, post-mortem, war room, severity, pages, alerts, rollback, incident, outage, on-call, post-mortem, production, reliability, SRE, communication" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing object detection, semantic/instance segmentation, 3D vision, or video understanding - covers YOLO, SAM, depth estimation, and multi-modal visionUse when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation powers web testing, scraping, and AI agent interactions. The difference between a flaky script and a reliable system comes down to understanding selectors, waiting strategies, and anti-detection patterns. This skill covers Playwright (recommended) and Puppeteer, with patterns for testing, scraping, and agentic browser control. Key insight: Playwright won the framework war. Unless you need Puppeteer's stealth ecosystem or are Chrome-only, Playwright is the better choice in 2025. Critical distinction: Testing automation (predictable apps you control) vs scraping/agent automation (unpredictable sites that fight back). Different problems, different solutions. Use when "playwright, puppeteer, browser automation, headless, web scraping, e2e test, end-to-end, selenium, chromium, browser test, page.click, locator, playwright, puppeteer, browser, automation, testing, scraping, headless, e2e, selenium, web-testing" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install a per-turn canary signal (e.g. starting every reply with the user's name and a turn counter) so silent context degradation becomes visible the moment it happens, and run a recovery protocol when the canary trips. Use when the user mentions a "canary", "context canary", or "canary check", asks to detect context rot / compaction / drift, says "you stopped using my name" or "did you lose context", asks "how degraded is your context", or wants an early-warning system for long agent sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and redirects scope creep during implementation — unrequested features, drive-by refactors, premature abstraction, and over-engineering. Use while implementing, especially when a change is growing beyond the original request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a multi-phase project from an orchestrating main thread that plans, routes and verifies but does not build. Defines a few long-lived workstreams, each owning a file area end to end in its own worktree, and routes every follow-up to the owning agent instead of spawning a one-off. Covers base-SHA recording, rebase-before-commit, stale-checkout detection, and shared-machine hygiene (ports, processes, measurement noise). Use when a project spans several phases or sessions with three or more agents working at once.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps specification documents and code in agreement. Audit mode finds every divergence when an implementation is claimed complete; sync mode detects spec drift in staged changes and updates the spec after user approval, so each commit is a reconciled snapshot of spec, tests, and code. Use when an implementation is claimed complete against a spec, before committing changes that may drift from the spec, or after approving decisions that must flow back into it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。