3,274 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Maintain an existing Proto UI Prototype or implement a governed Base or design-language component slice. Use for governed component behavior, anatomy, inheritance, exports, CLI registration, style projection, demos, or public preview work. Do not use to admit a new semantic subject or invent Base ownership from a component name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply one independently reviewable numeric Proto UI package-budget increase for an already accepted capability, using canonical cost evidence and existing development authorization. Use for standalone ceiling transactions, not feature implementation, measurement-policy changes, spending limits, publication or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a tailored application as a skeptical recruiter and an ATS parser. Use when the user wants strict feedback on an existing resume and cover letter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create an ATS-safe tailored resume and cover letter from an existing job analysis and the master resume. Use when the user asks to tailor an application for a company.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic methodology for achieving 100% backward dataflow reachability in a new language. Create gauntlet fixture, write trace, diagnose gaps, fix analyzer/algorithm, iterate to 100%. Language-agnostic process. Use when: (1) adding a new language to Grafema, (2) auditing dataflow coverage for existing language, (3) user says "/dataflow-gauntlet".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pattern for adding derived edge types in the Grafema Rust orchestrator (main.rs). Use when: (1) need to create new graph edges derived from existing edges (e.g., MODULE-level DEPENDS_ON from IMPORTS_FROM), (2) Datalog joins on large edge sets time out, (3) adding enrichment steps that combine data from multiple resolver outputs, (4) need to understand how resolver outputs flow through the orchestrator pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix RFDB data disappearing after compaction, where rfdb-server reports a tiny node count (e.g. "15 nodes") on startup despite manifest_index.json showing hundreds of thousands of nodes and segment files existing on disk. Use when: (1) rfdb-server logs "Default database: N nodes" with N orders of magnitude smaller than recent analysis output, (2) /api/stats returns only the most recent commit's nodes, (3) the issue appears AFTER a compaction event (manifest with l1_node_segments populated and node_segments: []), (4) subsequent commits dropped L1 references. Root cause: ManifestStore::create_manifest() initializes l1_node_segments/l1_edge_segments to Vec::new() instead of cloning from current manifest, so any commit AFTER compaction silently orphans all L1 data even though segment .seg files still exist on disk. Compaction injects L1 fields explicitly after create_manifest, but regular commits do not.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix silent failures when parsing Grafema semantic IDs that are in URI format instead of legacy arrow format. Use when: (1) code splits semantic IDs by "->" but gets the whole string back because IDs are grafema:// URIs, (2) file path extraction from semantic IDs returns empty or wrong values, (3) derived edges (DEPENDS_ON, etc.) produce 0 results despite source edges existing, (4) any code that processes semantic IDs after the analysis pipeline's to_uri_format() has run. The grafema:// URI format uses # fragments with percent-encoded characters instead of -> separators.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design guide + benchmarked pitfalls for building Monte-Carlo / Simulated Annealing refinement layers on top of greedy hex-grid layouts for code visualization (packages/gui/src/store/hexLayout.ts, sandbox/hex-sandbox, future Rust ports). Use when: (1) planning to add MC/SA on top of an existing hex-grid pack, (2) deciding whether a simpler SA would match a hierarchical MC with force-directed + chain drag, (3) budgeting wall-clock for million-node cold-start, (4) debugging "blob turns Swiss-cheese" or "folders stop nucleating" during MC refinement, (5) choosing between folder cohesion and raw Σ-link-length as cost function. Contains four hard-won, quantified lessons and anti-patterns that would take a full day of experiments to rediscover.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user says "找 bug" / "看一下有没有 bug" / "smart-qa" / "/smart-qa" / "帮我测一下这个项目" / "智能 QA" / "推断业务流程测一下"，or asks for an autonomous bug-hunt where they DON'T already know what to test. Distinct from `qa` (blind exploration) and `devtest` (verifies a specific change). smart-qa READS the project source — prefers PRD/requirements docs, falls back to code (activities, routes, click handlers, API calls) — then proposes a focused test plan for confirmation before driving the app. v1 stops after the user confirms the plan and hands off to the existing `qa` skill for execution. v2 (planned) adds per-step assertions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adopt govctl in an existing project. Discovers undocumented decisions, backfills ADRs/RFCs, annotates source code. Use when: (1) Project has no governance yet, (2) User mentions migrate, adopt, onboard, or brownfield
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate an approved finite batch of independent engineering or research responsibilities using the operator's existing worker channel. Use for broad repository discovery, multiple search directions, repeated checks and substantial dirty work; keep coupled single tasks with one worker and explicit solo work in the main session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /aif-plan or to improve an /aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design consultation: understands your product, researches the landscape, proposes a complete design system (aesthetic, typography, color, layout, spacing, motion), and generates font+color preview pages. Creates DESIGN.md as your project's design source of truth. For existing sites, use /plan-design-review to infer the system instead. Use when asked to "design system", "brand guidelines", or "create DESIGN.md".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or redesign product UI in an existing codebase, including a wireframe, substantive visual variations, and an interactive prototype. Use for requests about UI layout, visual direction, screens, flows, components, a landing page, dashboard, or making an interface feel polished. Do not use for backend work, system architecture, decks, or logic-only UI fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When making code changes or reviewing existing code, check if architecture diagram matches implementation, and keep the diagram in sync.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Food photography audit — reviews existing photos, identifies missing item photos, provides specific shot list with angles, lighting, and styling direction
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only for user-provided academic text, explicit scholarly claims, existing citations, or known bibliographies needing citations added, verified, replaced, extracted, or formatted. Supports claim-to-source matching, citation-support checks, replacements, and common academic citation formats. Do not use for general fact-checking, legal/journalistic citation work, open-ended 'find literature about X', topic-level exhaustive discovery, systematic-review corpus construction, PRISMA searches, or creating new research claims. Chinese: 为已有段落补参考文献、核验已有引用、替换错误引用、提取需引文论断、GB/T 7714 格式化.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a confirmed platform-neutral website Design System to a local Elementor Site Settings and Widget inheritance contract. Use for a new or rebuilt Elementor site that needs Global Style setup guidance, or an existing site that must preserve its current visual system. Do not redesign the site, implement Widgets, or modify WordPress, Elementor, themes, or remote data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate the custom Elementor Widget site workflow for kickoff, lightweight company intake, conditional reference research, new-versus-existing site style routing, uncertain next steps, project resumption, or continuous work across content, Design Systems, UI, HTML, and Widget implementation. Do not use for release, old-Widget troubleshooting, theme development, or remote WordPress management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clear an existing gc-branch so it can be onboarded again.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。