「careful」の検索結果

Session-scoped safety guardrails for destructive commands. Warns before rm -rf, DROP TABLE, force-push, git reset --hard, kubectl delete, and similar destructive operations. User can override each warning. Active for the current session only. Use when touching prod, debugging live systems, or working in a shared environment. Use when asked to "be careful", "safety mode", "prod mode", or "careful mode". NOT for scoping edits to a specific directory (see mk:freeze).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safety guardrails for destructive commands. Warns before rm -rf, DROP TABLE, force-push, git reset --hard, kubectl delete, and similar destructive operations. User can override each warning. Use when touching prod, debugging live systems, or working in a shared environment. Use when asked to "be careful", "safety mode", "prod mode", or "careful mode". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIエージェントの危険なコマンドを実行前に確認し、ファイル編集を指定ディレクトリ内に制限します。単独または併用のモードで、本番作業や自律実行時の操作を管理します。

• 本番作業で危険なコマンドを確認
• 特定ディレクトリだけ編集したいとき
• 自律実行時に保護を併用したいとき

Safety guardrails for destructive operations. Wraps workflows and agent actions in configurable safety modes: CAREFUL (warns before destructive commands), FREEZE (restricts file edits to one directory), GUARD (both modes combined). Use when working in production, running destructive scripts, or debugging in sensitive areas. Voice triggers: "be careful", "safety on", "guard mode", "freeze scope". Also used automatically by the workflow engine when a workflow preset has safety: "guard" enabled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack careful mode for risky work that needs a conservative pass, hazards, safeguards, and explicit confirmation points before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[31] ANALYZE. Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safety guardrails for destructive commands. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes, optimizes, and debugs C++ applications using modern C++20/23 features, template metaprogramming, and high-performance systems techniques. Use when building or refactoring C++ code requiring concepts, ranges, coroutines, SIMD optimization, or careful memory management — or when addressing performance bottlenecks, concurrency issues, and build system configuration with CMake.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for academic, hiring, publication, disciplinary, or other consequential decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Planning a coordinated set of items toward a goal, an event, a trip, or a project, where the request only comes together as several purchases with a structure between them, and later changes to a plan you have presented. Not needed when the customer wants a single item, however carefully chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Carefully curated, modern minimal style with elegant serif typography and understated, sophisticated palettes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when revising an AISTATS paper for concise AI-statistics framing, theorem-and-experiment clarity, 8-page two-column compression, double-blind wording, reproducibility clarity, statistically careful claims, and assumption-labeling discipline that survives statistician reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembles a genome de novo from Illumina short reads with SPAdes (isolate/careful/sc/meta/plasmid/rna modes), MEGAHIT (low-memory, huge datasets), Unicycler (bacterial finishing/hybrid), MaSuRCA (large hybrid), ABySS (Bloom-filter), and Platanus (heterozygous diploids), using multi-k de Bruijn graphs. Covers the repeat-resolution limit, why N50 plateaus at the genome not the depth, GenomeScope2 k-mer profiling first, the heterozygosity/haplotig trap, error-correction erasing rare alleles, GC dropout, and NG50/auN/BUSCO reporting. Use when assembling a bacterial isolate, fungal, small-eukaryotic, single-cell, or metagenome genome from Illumina reads, or when deciding whether short reads can even produce the assembly being asked for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combines careful + freeze. Dual protection: destructive command warnings plus edit boundary enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Warns before destructive commands (rm -rf, DROP TABLE, force-push, git reset --hard, kubectl delete, docker force-rm). Session-scoped. Exceptions for common temp dirs (node_modules, .next, __pycache__).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cialdini's seven principles of compliance (the classic six — reciprocation, commitment-consistency, social proof, liking, authority, scarcity — plus Unity, added 2016) and Pre-Suasion. Use when crafting ethical persuasion (marketing, sales, negotiation), defending against manipulation, or designing systems that need cooperation. Includes replication-crisis caveats and known factual corrections (Bickman parking-meter numbers, Hofling modern replication, Drive Carefully condition disambiguation, Genovese myth).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Avibe's local Computer Use CLI for carefully bounded desktop observation and actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs multi step work the way a careful senior engineer would. Triage before code, a short PRD in prds/, task.md kept current, docs synced after, and lessons recorded when a mistake repeats. Use when a task spans several files or steps, changes architecture, needs a plan the user can review, or when the user says "write a PRD", "plan this", "track this in task.md", or "what did we learn".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an AI coding agent is writing or refactoring production code and its known failure modes need to be held in check — over-engineering, silent scope creep, invented APIs, claiming work is done without checking, deleting tests to make them pass. Trigger when the user asks for careful, production-grade, or reviewed code, or when a previous agent run produced confident output that turned out wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GraphQL gives clients exactly the data they need - no more, no less. One endpoint, typed schema, introspection. But the flexibility that makes it powerful also makes it dangerous. Without proper controls, clients can craft queries that bring down your server. This skill covers schema design, resolvers, DataLoader for N+1 prevention, federation for microservices, and client integration with Apollo/urql. Key insight: GraphQL is a contract. The schema is the API documentation. Design it carefully. 2025 lesson: GraphQL isn't always the answer. For simple CRUD, REST is simpler. For high-performance public APIs, REST with caching wins. Use GraphQL when you have complex data relationships and diverse client needs. Use when "graphql, graphql schema, graphql resolver, apollo server, apollo client, graphql federation, dataloader, graphql codegen, graphql query, graphql mutation, graphql, api, apollo, schema, resolvers, dataloader, federation, typescript" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Augmented vision tools for analyzing images beyond native visual capabilities. Use when tasked with describing images in detail, reproducing images as SVGs, identifying subtle features, comparing image regions, reading degraded text, or any task requiring careful visual inspection. Also use when the image-to-svg skill needs ground truth about colors, shapes, or boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step 1 of debugging: observe the symptom carefully before jumping to conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safety guardrails for destructive commands. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。