「claims」の検索結果

Retrieves patent claims data from Nexscope (Nexscope). Trigger when the user mentions patent claims, claim text, independent claims, dependent claims, claim count, claims tree, claims analysis, claim scope, claim language, viewing the claims section of a specific patent, patent claims, independent claims, dependent claims, claims text, Nexscope. Also trigger when the user requests patent claims information by patent ID or publication number, even without explicitly mentioning Nexscope or Nexscope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieves translated patent claims from the Nexscope (Nexscope) patent database. Trigger when the user asks about patent claims, claims translation, viewing claims in specific languages (Chinese, English, or Japanese), querying patent claims by patent ID or publication number, analyzing claim text, claim translation, patent claim translation, Nexscope, patent translation. Also trigger when the user needs patent claim content in a specific language, even without explicitly mentioning translated claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

カスタムクレーム（Custom Claims）機能の開発・修正を行う際に使用。claims: scopeマッピング、verified_claims: マッピング実装時に役立つ。

Generate Claim, ClaimResponse, and ExplanationOfBenefit (EOB) resources for healthcare billing including professional, institutional, pharmacy (Rx), dental, and vision claims. Use when user mentions claims, EOB, explanation of benefit, billing, reimbursement, adjudication, pharmacy claims, Rx claims, denied claims, copay, deductible, or allowed amount.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze healthcare claims data for real-world evidence (RWE) studies. Use when working with medical/pharmacy claims (837/835), calculating utilization metrics, building patient cohorts, or analyzing treatment patterns. Triggers include claims data, RWE, real-world evidence, 837, 835, medical claims, pharmacy claims, utilization, treatment patterns, HEDIS, healthcare analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze insurance claims workflow systems for intake optimization, adjudication rules, subrogation, litigation management, and settlement analytics. Use when: 'audit claims process', 'review FNOL workflow', 'evaluate claims automation', 'check subrogation recovery', 'assess claims fraud detection', 'optimize claims cycle time', 'review Guidewire ClaimCenter setup'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

配送の遅延・破損・紛失・数量不足に対し、証拠収集から補償請求、運送会社との交渉までを整理し、損失額や顧客への影響に応じた対応判断を支えるスキル。

• 配送の遅延や紛失に対応したいとき
• 貨物破損の補償請求を準備したいとき
• 運送会社の料金や責任を争うとき

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

商品の返品受付から検品、返金、再販・廃棄の判断までを支援するスキル。不正の兆候や保証請求、仕入先への費用回収も含め、対応方針を整理します。

• 返品の受付条件と返金方針を確認したいとき
• 返品商品の状態と処理先を決めたいとき
• 不自然な返品パターンを調べたいとき

Draft patent claims for an invention. Use when user says "撰写权利要求", "draft claims", "写权利要求书", "claim drafting", or wants to create patent claims. The core skill of the patent pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "check our positioning against what we can actually ship", "trace which differentiators we can defend", or "reconcile the positioning canvas with the claims ledger"; reconciles the reused positioning canvas against the shippable stage and the claims ledger to produce a differentiation truth set — every differentiating claim verifiable or marked '[needs source]' — that TALE-T1 is judged against. Not for building the canvas — use positioning-mapper; not for adjudicating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for authoring the message house — use message-system-architect. 定位真相/差异化校准/可交付现实/主张核对

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) on a draft or a block of text with factual claims. Spawns the `claim-verifier` agent in a fresh context (never a conversation fork) so it never sees the draft — then reports which claims are supported, contradicted, or unverifiable. Use when user says "verify these citations", "check the claims in X", "did I hallucinate anything", "fact-check this draft", "run CoVe on this", or after any text generation that asserts facts about papers, datasets, or numerical results. NOT for style/grammar review (use `/proofread`) or substance review (use `/review-paper`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all statistical claims (numbers, percentages, named sources), fetches each cited URL via WebFetch, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for insurance-claims operations with Stedi whenever the user asks to submit claims, validate claim payloads, check claim status, retrieve/interpret 277CA or 835 responses, troubleshoot payer/provider enrollment requirements, or build deterministic claims workflows. Trigger this skill even if the user does not say "Stedi" explicitly but mentions 837/835/277CA/ERA, payer IDs, claim rejection codes, claim resubmission, COB, or healthcare clearinghouse automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete insurance and legal claims intelligence system. Trigger whenever someone needs to file, manage, negotiate, or dispute any type of claim: insurance claims, warranty claims, compensation claims, workers compensation, personal injury, property damage, or consumer rights disputes. Also triggers on phrases like "file a claim", "my insurer denied me", "how do I get compensated", "they won't pay", "what am I entitled to", or any scenario where someone has suffered a loss and needs to recover it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze insurance claims workflow systems for intake optimization, adjudication rules, subrogation, litigation management, and settlement analytics. Triggers: 'audit claims process', 'review FNOL workflow', 'evaluate claims automation', 'check subrogation recovery'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "check our positioning against what we can actually ship", "trace which differentiators we can defend", or "reconcile the positioning canvas with the claims ledger"; reconciles the reused positioning canvas against the shippable stage and the claims ledger to produce a differentiation truth set — every differentiating claim verifiable or marked '[needs source]' — that TALE-T1 is judged against. Not for building the canvas — use positioning-mapper; not for adjudicating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for authoring the message house — use message-system-architect. 定位真相/差异化校准/可交付现实/主张核对

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic claim-by-claim verification for any content before it ships. Modeled on professional fact-checking desks (The New Yorker, ProPublica, IFCN standards): extract every verifiable claim, check each against live citable sources (never training data), assign a 6-level confidence status, apply corrections, and produce a scored pass/fail report. Includes a data-derived-claims gate for outputs produced FROM the brain or a database: PRODUCER ≠ VERIFIER (re-derive each claim via a different query path) and AFFILIATION ≠ AUTHORSHIP (person→thing claims resolve through typed edges), with delivery hard-blocked on unsupported claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。