523 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
codex exec review を基本に、必要なら codex exec を使ってコード変更のレビューを依頼し、指摘事項を報告する。通常 / 厳しめ (--strict) / 敵対的 (--adversarial、実装を壊しにいく red team) の 3 モードを持つ。「codexでレビューして」「codex-review」「/codex-review」「敵対的にレビューして」で発火。Codex 単体での単独レビュー用途。複数エージェント並行レビューは cross-review、差分ではなくコードベース全体の監査は audit を使う。
Get a second opinion or independent review from Codex (OpenAI) via the local Codex CLI. Use when the user wants Codex to review a design memo, PR, diff, or decision, or to cross-check an approach from another model. Also trigger on "Codexに聞いて", "Codexと相談", "Codexにレビュー", "Codexの意見", "別のモデルで確認".
Runs a single Codex (ChatGPT/OpenAI) review check-fix cycle on a PR using gh CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: check and fix Codex review comments, request a Codex code review on a PR, or iterate on PR feedback from the chatgpt-codex-connector bot. Trigger on phrases like 'codex review', '@codex review', 'fix codex comments', 'iterate on PR', 're-review with codex', or when the user mentions 'gh pr' with 'codex'. Combine with /loop for automated repeated cycles, e.g. '/loop 2m /codex-review'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
修正完了後に agent-review-kit でレビューHTMLを生成し、ユーザーがブラウザで書いた差分コメントを Codex または Claude Code の同一セッションで受け取り、回答・修正・resolve を未解決0件まで繰り返すレビューループ。AIレビューの指摘を add-comment でブラウザ上のコメントとして表示し、ユーザーが返信した指摘だけ修正する「AIレビューモード」も含む。実装プラン・設計書などの任意HTMLを publish-html でレンダリング済みのまま表示し、要素クリック・テキスト範囲でコメントを受け取る「HTMLレビューモード」も含む。他のレビュースキルの結果の出力先として agent-review-kit が指定された場合も、このスキルを読んで AI レビューモードの手順に従うこと。Use when the user wants to review changes in a browser (GitHub-like diff review), review a rendered HTML doc (plan/design doc) in a browser, iterate on fixes with inline comments, or display AI review findings as browser comments (output target: agent-review-kit).
This skill should be used when the user wants to "stress-test a design", "challenge an idea", "red team a proposal", "get critical feedback on a design", "validate a design", "adversarial architecture review", "risk assessment", "設計を検証して", "反論をもらいたい", "設計を批判的にレビュー", "デビルズアドボケート", "ストレステスト", "弱点を指摘して", "穴を見つけて", "この設計で良いか", "リスク評価", "設計のアーキテクチャレビュー", or mentions structured adversarial review of a proposal or design. NOTE: Use this for validating PROPOSALS and DESIGNS through adversarial debate, NOT for generic code review, PR review, or normal review requests (use /codex:review or /codex:adversarial-review for those). Also NOT for investigating unknown bugs (use /agent-dialectics:strong-inference for that).
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an independent code review using the OpenAI Codex CLI in headless mode. Gets a second opinion from a different model family (the current Codex models) on recent changes, a PR, a commit, or the whole app — covering bugs, regressions, security, data consistency, UX/state bugs, performance risks, and testing gaps. Saves a severity-prioritised report to .jez/reviews/. Triggers: 'codex review', 'review with codex', 'independent code review', 'what does codex think', 'get codex to review'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an adversarial two-phase code review of a change with TWO independent reviewers — Claude and Codex — who review alone, then cross-examine each other's findings, then Claude synthesizes a single weighted verdict. Use when the user says "/adversarial-review", "adversarial review", "review this with Codex", "get Codex to review", "two-reviewer review", "cross-examine this PR", or wants a second independent model to grade a change before merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenAI Codex (CLI / IDE / cloud) の公式リファレンス。 codex CLI, codex exec, AGENTS.md, rules, subagents, prompting, approvals, sandbox, permission profiles, auto-review, config.toml, profiles, MCP 設定, 環境変数, GitHub Action, Codex SDK, Agents SDK 連携, cloud 委譲, administration, roles, provisioning, analytics API, compliance API, Codex Security 脆弱性スキャン, deep scan, triage, findings, SARIF export, threat model, security hardening, cloud / local / worktree 環境, git worktrees, Record & Replay, GitHub / Linear / Slack 連携。
Claude Code と Codex CLI による並列コードレビュー。親で差分・コンテキストを 1 回だけ収集し、Claude Code（全観点を一括レビュー）と Codex（`/codex-review` 経由）を並列実行、結果を統合した review.md / review.html を生成する。
クロスレビュー。有識者エージェント3つの並行レビュー + Codex レビュー + Codex 敵対的レビュー（red team）で変更を多視点レビューし、結果を統合報告する（コードは変更しない）。「クロスレビューして」「cross-reviewして」「複数視点でレビューして」で発動。Codex 単体で足りる軽いレビューは codex-review、レビュー結果の修正・実装まで任せる場合は forge を使う。
Leverage OpenAI Codex/GPT models for autonomous code implementation, code review, and plan review. Triggers: "codex", "use gpt", "gpt-5", "let openai", "full-auto", "adversarial review", "second opinion review", "用codex", "让gpt实现", "对抗式审查", "让codex审查计划", "第二意见". Use this skill whenever the user wants to delegate coding tasks to OpenAI models, run code or plan reviews via codex, get a second-opinion review from a different model, or execute tasks in a sandboxed environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent review loop run before delivery in code work. An independent reviewer (Codex, or fresh Codex-style subagents) reads the whole PR against the approved outcome; the lead fixes in-scope functional findings and re-reviews until none remain. Its differentiator is independence and exhaustiveness — a reviewer that fails differently from the authors, run to clean — distinct from the recursive-refinement ladder. Invoked by the team lead from the unified pre-ship gate (code-mode and /swarm:refine) after the ship steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenAI Codex CLI wrapper — three modes. Code review: independent diff review via codex review with pass/fail gate. Challenge: adversarial mode that tries to break your code. Consult: ask codex anything with session continuity for follow-ups. The "200 IQ autistic developer" second opinion. Use when asked to "codex review", "codex challenge", "ask codex", "second opinion", or "consult codex". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "code x", "code ex", "get another opinion".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides Codex CLI delegation workflows for complex code generation and development tasks using OpenAI's GPT-5.3-codex models, including English prompt formulation, execution flags, sandbox modes, and safe result handling. Use when the user explicitly asks to use Codex for complex programming tasks such as code generation, refactoring, or architectural analysis. Triggers on "use codex", "delegate to codex", "run codex cli", "ask codex", "codex exec", "codex review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hand off code review to OpenAI Codex CLI. Use when asked to "review code with codex", "codex review", "get a second opinion on code", "review my changes", "review this PR", or when you want AI-powered code review from a different model perspective.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
codex:codex-rescueエージェントを起動する各スキル(codex-review-loop・codex-consult等)が共有する、ハング防止付きの起動・監視・再試行契約の正本。内部専用でユーザーが直接使うものではない。
make review / make review-close があるプロジェクトで、Codex の PR レビューと修正を最大5周回す。「レビューループ」「review-loop」「make review で回して」で発火。各レビューを対象 commit と対応付け、根拠を確認して修正し、完了後にクローズする。
Launches and manages the local OpenAI Codex CLI as a non-interactive coding sub-agent via ChatGPT Pro OAuth, never API keys. Use to delegate coding tasks to Codex, run codex exec, generate or refactor code, or get a Codex code review; phrases like 'codex', 'run codex', 'codex exec', 'delegate to codex'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codexによるread-onlyローカルレビューを実行する。Triggers on: '/codex-review', 'Codexでレビューして', 'クロスモデルレビューして'