「cohesion」の検索結果

Identify design quality issues in code including high coupling, low cohesion, God classes, long methods, and other code smells. Use when: (1) Reviewing code architecture and design quality, (2) Identifying refactoring opportunities, (3) Detecting God classes or classes with too many responsibilities, (4) Finding high coupling or low cohesion issues, (5) Analyzing code maintainability and technical debt. Detects coupling smells, cohesion problems, complexity issues, size violations, and encapsulation problems with actionable refactoring suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes coupling and cohesion metrics in PHP codebases. Calculates Afferent/Efferent coupling (Ca/Ce), LCOM metrics, instability index, and abstractness. Identifies highly coupled modules and low cohesion classes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or design generative AI interfaces against three diagnostic pillars (deterministic-stochastic balance, interaction density, visual cohesion). Treats taste as a measurable control system, not subjective preference. Use when: 'taste audit', 'score this UI', 'design quality', 'interaction density', 'visual cohesion', 'refiner layer', 'correction cost', 'why does this feel off', 'polish this', 'design review', or building any user-facing AI product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review software architecture for coupling, cohesion, SOLID principles, API design, scalability, and technical debt. Covers system-level evaluation, architecture decision record review, and improvement recommendations. Use when evaluating a proposed architecture before implementation, assessing an existing system for scalability or security, reviewing ADRs, performing a technical debt assessment, or evaluating readiness for significant scale-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MMI評価エージェント - Modularity Maturity Indexによるモジュール成熟度評価（Cohesion/Coupling/Independence/Reusability）。/evaluate-mmi [対象パス] で呼び出し。

MMI評価エージェント - Modularity Maturity Indexによるモジュール成熟度評価（Cohesion/Coupling/Independence/Reusability）。/evaluate-mmi [対象パス] で呼び出し。

Maps business domains and suggests service boundaries in any codebase using DDD Strategic Design. Use when asking "what are the domains in this codebase?", "where should I draw service boundaries?", "identify bounded contexts", "classify subdomains", "DDD analysis", or analyzing domain cohesion. Do NOT use for grouping existing components into domains (use domain-identification-grouping) or dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design premium Three.js game UI: HUDs, menus, overlays, pause/win/lose screens, settings, icon controls, touch UI, typography, responsive layout, safe areas, text fit, and UI/world cohesion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or evaluate a brand visual identity system covering logo, color, typography, imagery direction, iconography, and motion principles. Use this skill whenever the user wants to design a logo, build a visual identity, define brand colors, choose brand typography, develop iconography, plan brand imagery, or evaluate an existing identity for cohesion. Triggers on logo design, brand identity, visual identity, brand mark, wordmark, monogram, color palette, brand colors, brand typography, type system, iconography, brand imagery, motion design, brand system, identity system. Also triggers when the user has a brand direction approved and now needs the visual artifacts that express it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Balanced Coupling model for software design. Use when: designing modular architectures, evaluating coupling between components, reviewing code modularity, deciding whether to split or merge modules/services, assessing integration patterns, classifying coupling as balanced or unbalanced, applying DDD strategic and tactical patterns, reasoning about cohesion vs coupling trade-offs, identifying distributed monolith risks, or explaining why a system is hard to change. Provides the three-dimensional framework (integration strength, distance, volatility) and the balance rule for making coupling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-pass lyric refinement for tightening, cohesion, and album unity. Use after lyrics are written to polish a track or entire album through iterative passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Objectively evaluate a UI/web design against the pols.dev anti-slop design law: detect catalogued slop tells with cited evidence, score 8 weighted axes (color, type, components, layout, motion, execution, signature, cohesion), and emit a Slop Report with a 0–100 Slop Index and grade. Use when the user asks to "evaluate design slop", "slop report", "is this design AI slop", "audit this landing page design", "de-slop review", or wants an objective score of how generic/machine-made a design looks. To fix text (not design), use human-ai or humanizar skills instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Software design principles, patterns, and architecture from SOLID through distributed systems. Covers the five SOLID principles with violations and fixes, DRY/KISS/YAGNI heuristics, separation of concerns, 12 GoF design patterns organized by intent (creational, structural, behavioral), architectural patterns (MVC, MVP, MVVM, layered, hexagonal, microservices, event-driven), coupling and cohesion metrics, dependency injection, and the design decision framework for choosing between competing approaches. Use when making design decisions, reviewing architecture, refactoring code, or teaching software engineering principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to discover, define, or refine their product's aesthetic identity. Triggers on "what should this feel like?", "help me figure out the vibe", "something feels off visually", "I want it to feel like [X]", "define the visual language", or when a project has no established design direction. This is the art director skill - it helps users articulate something they can feel but can't name. Also handles quick cohesion checks when the orchestrator needs one during cycle planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review software architecture, including package cohesion and inter-package coupling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design guide + benchmarked pitfalls for building Monte-Carlo / Simulated Annealing refinement layers on top of greedy hex-grid layouts for code visualization (packages/gui/src/store/hexLayout.ts, sandbox/hex-sandbox, future Rust ports). Use when: (1) planning to add MC/SA on top of an existing hex-grid pack, (2) deciding whether a simpler SA would match a hierarchical MC with force-directed + chain drag, (3) budgeting wall-clock for million-node cold-start, (4) debugging "blob turns Swiss-cheese" or "folders stop nucleating" during MC refinement, (5) choosing between folder cohesion and raw Σ-link-length as cost function. Contains four hard-won, quantified lessons and anti-patterns that would take a full day of experiments to rediscover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight design smell review for modules and APIs—coupling, cohesion, naming, boundaries, and unnecessary complexity. Use before large refactors or when code feels hard to change. Complements gstack/review (diff-focused).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Regenerate and commit Class S site-served artifacts after registry changes, then sync documentation across the main repo and the adjacent wiki. Use this skill when: you've changed registry/nodes/, registry/named/, or named-skills.json and need to regenerate docs/graph/* so the live website reflects the update; CI Guard E (docs-cohesion.yml) is failing because Class S artifacts are out of date; someone says "sync the docs", "regenerate docs", "run gaia dev docs", "update the site graph", "commit the Class S artifacts", "website is stale", or "update the wiki"; or you're finishing a registry PR and need to ensure docs/graph/gaia.json, docs/graph/gaia.gexf, docs/graph/gaia.svg, and docs/graph/named/index.json are committed alongside the source change. Also covers updating README.md, docs/index.html, and mirroring changes to the adjacent wiki repo at ../gaia-wiki.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score your codebase 0-100 across complexity, coupling, cohesion, test coverage, documentation, churn hotspots, dependency health, and lint/type safety. Triggers: 'how healthy is this codebase', 'check code quality', 'score my project', 'find tech debt hotspots'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when revising or reviewing scientific, technical, or academic manuscripts, proposals, abstracts, reports, or related writing for precision, concision, logical cohesion, citation support, evidence alignment, and objective scholarly tone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve code structure, readability, and maintainability without changing external behavior through systematic refactoring techniques like extracting functions, removing duplication, simplifying conditionals, and applying design patterns. Use when reducing technical debt, extracting functions or classes, removing code duplication, simplifying complex conditionals, renaming for clarity, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing coupling, increasing cohesion, or maintaining test coverage during structural improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three-axis orchestrator: (1) clean section boundaries — naming, routes, views, ViewModels, DB ownership, cross-section access; (2) internal cohesion — no EF in service layer, caching in service only, proper interfaces, reusable ViewComponents, architecture-test coverage; (3) focused tests — grouped under the section, covering invariants/negatives/triggers, pruned of redundancy. Push-and-bot-review loop. Use when a sizable PR landed, a section shows arch drift, or /pr-review returned a non-trivial violation list. Camps is the gold-standard reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。