216 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Structure a cohort analysis for retention, LTV, or behavioural patterns. Use when asked to run a cohort analysis, analyse retention by cohort, segment users by behaviour over time, or calculate lifetime value by acquisition period. Produces a complete cohort analysis framework with methodology, cohort definitions, retention curves, and prioritised interventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building a quarterly bookings forecast, ARR projection, pipeline forecast, NRR projection, or commit/best-case/pipe-only board number — especially when the CRO needs to walk the board through funnel math + cohort ARR + per-stage conversion assumptions without the theatre of a single undefended number. Decomposes pipeline into commit, best-case, and pipe-only tiers; projects cohort-level NRR/GRR to surface leaky cohorts before they show up in the consolidated number; scores per-stage funnel confidence so soft-floor stages get treated differently from high-confidence ones. Every output explicitly names the conversion rate used, the data window, and the weighting choice. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, VP Sales, and CRO at quarterly forecast or board prep. NOT financial close (see finance/financial-analysis). NOT strategic CRO hiring/territory (see c-level-advisor/cro-advisor). NOT pricing (see sibling pricing-strategist).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs retrospective or prospective clinical cohort study protocols for biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a cohort-based study plan rather than a general study idea, evidence summary, or mechanistic experiment design. Focus on cohort appropriateness, enrollment logic, baseline time-zero definition, follow-up structure, endpoint definition, variable collection, confounding control, and a coherent primary statistical analysis line. Do not invent data availability, follow-up completeness, outcome ascertainment quality, sample size adequacy, or causal interpretability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a user interview topic in PostHog — pick who to target (cohort, emails, or PostHog distinct IDs), draft what to ask about, and prepare the voice-agent context plus a question list. Use when the user asks to "talk to users", "check how users feel about X", "interview some customers", "set up a user interview", "run a user-research call", "find users to ask about Y", or otherwise wants qualitative feedback through a conversation. Walks the user through targeting (cohorts-list, persons-list, or accepting emails / distinct IDs directly), captures the topic, and prompts for agent context and questions before calling user-interview-topics-create. Cohort targeting is resolved to explicit emails/distinct_ids at create time — topics snapshot their audience and do not re-evaluate cohort membership later. Do NOT trigger when the user is uploading a recorded interview audio file (that's the separate UserInterview/transcript flow) or only browsing existing topics with user-interview-topics-list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze unit economics for PE targets — ARR cohorts, LTV/CAC, net retention, payback periods, revenue quality, and margin waterfall. Essential for software/SaaS, recurring revenue, and subscription businesses. Use when evaluating revenue quality, building a cohort analysis, or assessing customer economics. Triggers on "unit economics", "cohort analysis", "ARR analysis", "LTV CAC", "net retention", "revenue quality", or "customer economics".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform cohort analysis on user engagement data — retention curves, feature adoption trends, and segment-level insights. Use when analyzing user retention by cohort, studying feature adoption over time, investigating churn patterns, or identifying engagement trends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-semester case handoff memos — the mirror of /ramp. Produces per-case transition memos and a cohort summary so the departing cohort hands work to the incoming cohort cleanly. Reads deadlines, client-comms, and case history. Use when the professor or departing students need to wrap up the semester, build transition memos, or offboard a graduating/withdrawing student.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Use when the user provides a cohort study article or text and needs a quality assessment report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fit a retention curve to observed cohort data and project LTV — computed, not estimated. Use when someone has real cohort retention numbers (month 0, 1, 2…) and asks what lifetime value, lifetime periods, or long-run retention they imply, or whether retention is flattening or leaking. Produces a fitted power curve (parameters, R², retention floor), a 24-36 period projection, and a real .xlsx with live formulas where editing ARPU recalculates LTV — via the bundled zero-dependency script.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run cohort analysis: retention matrix and LTV by cohort. Churn scoring → churn-risk. "build a retention matrix"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Time-based cohort analysis with retention and behaviour tracking. Activate when you need to measure how groups of users/customers behave over time — retention rates, revenue by cohort, or feature adoption curves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when looking for research topics a longitudinal cohort database can answer (NHIS, UK Biobank, an institutional EMR or registry). Profiles the cohort, matches PI expertise, scans literature saturation and returns ranked topic proposals with gap evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in live learning experiences - cohort-based courses, workshops, webinars, coaching sessions, and real-time facilitation. Covers designing for synchronous learning, building peer accountability, and creating transformative live experiences that self-paced courses can't match. Use when "cohort course, live course, workshop, webinar, group coaching, live session, cohort-based, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deconstructs customer cohort behavior with retention curves, LTV progression, and vintage-over-vintage comparison analysis. Use when analyzing cohort data, assessing customer quality, or modeling lifetime value trajectories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI cohort analysis systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-cohort-analyzer related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Conduct cohort analysis to track user behavior over time, build retention matrices, and compare cohort performance. Use this skill when the user needs to measure retention, understand how user behavior changes after acquisition, compare product versions' impact on engagement, or predict LTV — even if they say 'what's our retention rate', 'are newer users behaving differently', 'build a retention table', or 'how long do customers stick around'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configuring or troubleshooting the Nonprofit Success Pack Program Management Module (PMM) - program delivery, cohort setup, service scheduling, service delivery recording, and attendance tracking for beneficiaries. Trigger keywords: program management module, PMM, Program__c, ProgramEngagement__c, ServiceDelivery__c, cohort setup, bulk service delivery, service schedule, service participant. NOT for designing which outcomes and indicators to measure - use admin/program-outcome-tracking-design. NOT for NPSP donor, household and giving-rollup data - use data/nonprofit-data-architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI cohort analysis systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-cohort-analyzer related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Call copy number variants with the GATK best-practices workflows — the somatic CNV pipeline (CollectReadCounts, DenoiseReadCounts with tangent normalization, ModelSegments, CallCopyRatioSegments) and the germline GATK-gCNV pipeline (DetermineGermlineContigPloidy, GermlineCNVCaller cohort/case mode, PostprocessGermlineCNVCalls). Covers panel-of-normals construction, AnnotateIntervals/FilterIntervals, allelic-count integration, and QS-based filtering. Use when integrating CNV calling into a GATK variant pipeline, calling rare germline CNVs from an exome cohort, deciding between the somatic and germline GATK workflows, or diagnosing why tangent normalization removed a real event or why gCNV output has low precision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visualize copy number profiles, segments, allele-specific tracks, and cohort patterns from CNVkit, GATK, ASCAT, FACETS, Sequenza, and other callers. Covers genome-wide and per-chromosome log2 scatter plots, B-allele-frequency/minor-allele-fraction tracks, ideograms, cohort heatmaps, circos views, and caller-native plots. Use when creating publication CNV figures, choosing which plot answers a given question, diagnosing a wrong diploid baseline visually, displaying loss of heterozygosity, or deciding what depth-only plots cannot reveal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify recurrent and driver copy number alterations across a tumor cohort with GISTIC2 (G-score, Ziggurat deconstruction, focal vs broad/arm-level analysis, q-values from permutation) and quantify copy-number signatures with the Steele 2022 COSMIC framework and the Drews 2022 CINSignatures framework. Covers driver-gene localization from recurrence peaks, distinguishing focal drivers from arm-level passengers, and the caller-sensitivity caveats of copy-number signatures. Use when finding recurrently amplified or deleted regions in a cohort, localizing driver genes, separating focal from broad events, running GISTIC2, or extracting copy-number mutational signatures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Batch effect correction for CRISPR screens covering ComBat empirical-Bayes, RUV, SVA, control-sgRNA normalization, and the model-based alternative of including batch as a covariate in MAGeCK MLE or Chronos. Covers screen-specific batch sources (passage cohort, library lot, infection day, sequencing run, Cas9 lot, FBS lot), PCA + variance-decomposition diagnostic to decide if correction is needed, when correction harms biology by over-correcting condition into batch, limma removeBatchEffect for visualization-only correction, and relationship to multi-condition design matrices. Use when combining screens for joint analysis, when passage cohort confounds biology, when DepMap-style panels need Chronos with batch covariates, when picking ComBat vs RUV, or when correction harms biology and should be replaced with explicit covariate modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when comparing process cohorts, departments, periods or before-and-after results under matched definitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。