Expert-level concrete design covering reinforced concrete beams, columns, slabs, footings, retaining walls, ACI 318 code provisions, and durability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
380 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Expert-level concrete design covering reinforced concrete beams, columns, slabs, footings, retaining walls, ACI 318 code provisions, and durability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix concrete MSBuild property defects in projects and existing shared-file hierarchies. USE FOR: conditions, defaults, append versus overwrite, last-write-wins values, OS/TFM checks, portable paths, normalization, and reviews centered on those property defects. Property defects in Directory.Build.* remain in scope, including overwritten values across parent/child imports and conditions that run before TargetFramework is set, even when the fix changes import order or moves a property group to .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: placement-only or import-only requests with no concrete property defect, such as discovering shared files or choosing which file owns a target or customization (use directory-build-organization); item operations; target structure; broad reviews without a concrete property defect; non-MSBuild work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix concrete MSBuild property defects in projects and existing shared-file hierarchies. USE FOR: conditions, defaults, append versus overwrite, last-write-wins values, OS/TFM checks, portable paths, normalization, and reviews centered on those property defects. Property defects in Directory.Build.* remain in scope, including overwritten values across parent/child imports and conditions that run before TargetFramework is set, even when the fix changes import order or moves a property group to .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: placement-only or import-only requests with no concrete property defect, such as discovering shared files or choosing which file owns a target or customization (use directory-build-organization); item operations; target structure; broad reviews without a concrete property defect; non-MSBuild work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining concepts at different expertise levels, moving between abstract principles and concrete implementation, identifying edge cases by testing ideas against scenarios, designing layered documentation, decomposing complex problems into actionable steps, or bridging strategy-execution gaps. Invoke when user mentions abstraction levels, making concepts concrete, or explaining at different depths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
画面の余白、文字、角丸、影、動きを見直し、見た目と操作感を整えるスキル。ボタンやカードなどの細部を点検し、変更前後が分かる具体的な改善案を示します。
Claudeの初回編集やファイル作成をいったん止め、呼び出し元・データ構造・依頼内容の確認を促すフックを設定し、変更前の調査を組み込むスキル。
Own concrete MSBuild ItemGroup and item-expression questions. USE FOR: Include, Remove, Update, item identity and metadata, transforms, filtering, batching, duplicate or overlapping items, and reviews that verify whether those operations are correct. Generated items stay in scope when the central defect is item identity, metadata, batching, duplicate declarations, or glob/Remove/Update semantics. For a generated artifact missing from compilation or output, wrong target timing/path, or FileWrites clean tracking without a broader item-semantics defect, use including-generated-files. The item operation may be broken, suspected, or already correct. Exclude property-only issues, general incrementality with no item question, broad reviews with no concrete item concern, and non-MSBuild systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review or de-slop concrete changes in ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI at maintainer level: PR numbers or URLs, branches, commit ranges, patch files, staged or unstaged worktrees, and scoped repository-hygiene requests. Use for evidence-first correctness, contract, repository-rule, process, and behavior-preserving cleanup review, including debug residue, dead or duplicate code, speculative abstractions, stale comments or tests, and unrelated diff churn. Do not use for abstract designs with no concrete repository artifact; use audit for repository-wide assessments and vuln-check for security-only checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Craft messages that are understood, remembered, and drive action using the SUCCESs checklist (Simple, Unexpected, Concrete, Credible, Emotional, Stories). Use when the user mentions "make it memorable", "no one remembers our pitch", "tagline", "value proposition", "why the message isnt landing", "curse of knowledge", or "concrete language". Also trigger when writing a pitch deck, simplifying a complex product explanation, or making a presentation more compelling. Covers the six SUCCESs traits and the curse of knowledge. For narrative brand frameworks, see storybrand-messaging. For viral sharing, see contagious.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a Montessori three-period lesson for introducing concepts through concrete materials and naming. Use when teaching vocabulary, classifications, or concepts through hands-on materials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract learning sequence for a mathematical concept using manipulatives. Use when teaching maths through Singapore method or when students struggle with abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Own concrete MSBuild ItemGroup and item-expression questions. USE FOR: Include, Remove, Update, item identity and metadata, transforms, filtering, batching, duplicate or overlapping items, and reviews that verify whether those operations are correct. Generated items stay in scope when the central defect is item identity, metadata, batching, duplicate declarations, or glob/Remove/Update semantics. For a generated artifact missing from compilation or output, wrong target timing/path, or FileWrites clean tracking without a broader item-semantics defect, use including-generated-files. The item operation may be broken, suspected, or already correct. Exclude property-only issues, general incrementality with no item question, broad reviews with no concrete item concern, and non-MSBuild systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brutalist and concrete-monument mood direction for Blender architecture and scenes with raw concrete, monumental scale, and austere composition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate systematic refinement steps from high-level specifications to concrete implementations in Isabelle/HOL or Coq, preserving correctness obligations at each step. Use when working with formal verification, program refinement, proof development, or when translating abstract specifications into executable code while maintaining formal guarantees. Supports data refinement (abstract types → concrete structures), algorithmic refinement (specifications → algorithms), and stepwise refinement with proof obligations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate concrete counterexamples when formal verification, assertions, or specifications fail. Use this skill when debugging failed proofs, understanding why verification fails, creating minimal reproducing examples, analyzing assertion violations, investigating invariant breaks, or diagnosing specification mismatches. Produces concrete input values, execution traces, and state information that demonstrate the failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a Montessori three-period lesson for introducing concepts through concrete materials and naming. Use when teaching vocabulary, classifications, or concepts through hands-on materials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract learning sequence for a mathematical concept using manipulatives. Use when teaching maths through Singapore method or when students struggle with abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Civil Engineering Technician — running and interpreting a concrete field acceptance test (slump, air content, cylinder breaks against ACI 318 criteria), verifying soil compaction against a Proctor density curve, reconciling a concrete or rebar quantity takeoff against a pay application, or documenting a field condition that deviates from the approved plans for the engineer of record.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a cement mason / concrete finisher — timing float and trowel work against bleed water and set, laying out and cutting control joints on a slab, choosing air-entrainment and mix parameters for freeze-thaw exposure, adjusting a finishing schedule for hot- or cold-weather concreting, or diagnosing a slab defect (blistering, scaling, random cracking) after the fact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level structural engineering covering structural analysis, steel and concrete design, load combinations, deflection, connections, and building codes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marp形式プレゼンテーションの専門レビュー・評価・改善スキル。 10軸スコアリング(100点満点)で品質を定量評価し、具体的な改善コード付きで提案する。 Use when the user asks to: - Review, evaluate, or critique a Marp presentation / プレゼンをレビュー / 評価 / 添削 - Improve, polish, or upgrade existing slides / スライドを改善 / ブラッシュアップ - Check slide quality, score slides, or audit a deck / スライドの品質チェック / 採点 - "このプレゼンどう?" "スライドを見てほしい" "プレゼン資料のフィードバック" Reads .md files with Marp frontmatter, scores across 10 dimensions, and outputs a detailed review report with concrete before/after code improvements. Works as a companion to the marp-slides skill (generation → review → improvement cycle).
Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a new Claude Code skill from a concrete use case and produce a repo-ready skill package. Use when the user asks to create a new skill, define a skill's responsibility, draft SKILL.md, choose frontmatter, design supporting files, or prepare eval criteria for a new skill. Also trigger on "スキルを作りたい", "スキルを作って", "スキルを追加して", "新しいスキル", "SKILL.md生成".
This skill should be used when the user asks to "このエラーを直して", "help me debug this", "fix this stack trace", "なぜこのエラーが出るの", "CI が落ちた", or pastes an error message or stack trace and wants help diagnosing it. Classifies the error type, identifies related files, and proposes up to three root-cause hypotheses with concrete fix plans.