「control systems」の検索結果

Expert SOX IT General Controls (ITGC) advisor for finance, internal audit and IT compliance teams. Covers the four ITGC domains external auditors test for SOX 404 — access to programs and data, program changes, computer operations, and program development — plus scoping in-scope systems from the financial statements, designing risk-and-control matrices (RCMs), writing control narratives and test scripts, evaluating deficiencies (control deficiency vs significant deficiency vs material weakness under AS 2201 and Reg S-X), drafting remediation plans, SOX 404(a)/404(b) applicability and filer status, IPO readiness timelines, and COSO 2013 alignment. Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOX, ITGC, IT general controls, 404(a)/404(b), ICFR, material weakness, user access reviews, segregation of duties in IT, change management controls for financial systems, SOX testing or walkthroughs, PCAOB audits, or quarterly compliance for financial reporting systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical control and system dynamics for engineered systems — feedback and closed-loop control, transfer functions and block diagrams, poles/zeros and stability, time-domain response (rise time, overshoot, settling time), PID controllers and tuning, and frequency response (Bode plots, gain and phase margin). Traces feedback control from the flyball governor to modern controllers. Use when analyzing feedback loops, designing or tuning a PID controller, assessing stability from poles or margins, or characterizing transient response of a dynamic system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level control systems engineering covering feedback control, PID design, root locus, frequency domain methods, state-space design, and digital control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for feedback control systems including PID tuning, state-space control, Model Predictive Control (MPC), trajectory tracking, and stability analysis. Covers both classical and modern control approaches for robotics and automation. Use when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB R2026a workflow for control systems, system identification, robust control, MPC, Simulink Control Design, parameter tuning, constrained optimization, and numerical validation. Use whenever the user asks for controllers, transfer functions, state-space models, tuning, identification, optimal control, or solver-based engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill enables Claude to audit access control implementations in various systems. It uses the access-control-auditor plugin to identify potential vulnerabilities and misconfigurations related to access control. Use this skill when the user asks to "audit access control", "check permissions", "assess access rights", or requests a "security review" focused on access management. It's particularly useful for analyzing IAM policies, ACLs, and other access control mechanisms in cloud environments, applications, or infrastructure. The skill helps ensure compliance with security best practices and identify potential privilege escalation paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers detecting cyber attacks targeting Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems including man-in-the-middle attacks on industrial protocols, unauthorized command injection into PLCs, HMI compromise, historian data manipulation, and denial-of-service against control system communications. It leverages OT-specific intrusion detection systems, industrial protocol anomaly detection, and process data analytics to identify attacks that traditional IT security tools miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Control Systems Engineer. Use when a task calls for Control Systems Engineer judgment. Reasons from plant dynamics, stability margins, and disturbance-rejection specs through Bode/Nyquist and Routh-Hurwitz analysis, LQR/H-infinity and pole placement, Kalman/EKF observers, RGA pairing, and HIL validation while treating integrator windup, actuator saturation and backlash limit cycles, sensor delay masking phase margin, and estimator divergence as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a systems engineer/architect working at the whole-program level — decomposing requirements across hardware/software/network subsystems, writing or reviewing an interface control document (ICD), making a build-vs-buy tradeoff for a subsystem, or tracing a verification failure back through the requirements baseline. Distinct from a software engineer (owns one service's code) or DevOps/SRE (owns operational reliability) — this role owns the technical baseline for a whole system-of-systems and is accountable when subsystems built by different teams or vendors don't fit together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers detecting cyber attacks targeting Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems including man-in-the-middle attacks on industrial protocols, unauthorized command injection into PLCs, HMI compromise, historian data manipulation, and denial-of-service against control system communications. It leverages OT-specific intrusion detection systems, industrial protocol anomaly detection, and process data analytics to identify attacks that traditional IT security tools miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-160 Vol 1 (Engineering Trustworthy Secure Systems) and Vol 2 (Developing Cyber-Resilient Systems). Use for systems security engineering (SSE): the three SSE framework contexts (problem/solution/trustworthiness), the 30+ design principles for trustworthy secure design, trustworthiness and assurance/assurance cases, security across the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 life-cycle process groups, and the Vol 2 cyber-resiliency engineering framework — 4 goals (anticipate/withstand/recover/adapt), objectives, 14 techniques, implementation approaches, and design principles for the APT/adverse-conditions threat model. Bridges systems engineering and the NIST security cluster (CSF/SSDF/RMF). Does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text, nor cover SP 800-53 control catalogs in depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers detecting cyber attacks targeting Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems including man-in-the-middle attacks on industrial protocols, unauthorized command injection into PLCs, HMI compromise, historian data manipulation, and denial-of-service against control system communications. It leverages OT-specific intrusion detection systems, industrial protocol anomaly detection, and process data analytics to identify attacks that traditional IT security tools miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers detecting cyber attacks targeting Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems including man-in-the-middle attacks on industrial protocols, unauthorized command injection into PLCs, HMI compromise, historian data manipulation, and denial-of-service against control system communications. It leverages OT-specific intrusion detection systems, industrial protocol anomaly detection, and process data analytics to identify attacks that traditional IT security tools miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs servers and corporate systems — patching, configuration baselines, change control, capacity, and the routine that prevents incidents. Use this to establish a patching cadence, standardize server configuration, plan a maintenance window, decide change control for infrastructure, or clean up systems that have drifted from any known state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI lifecycle management, AI incident management, AI transparency, AI bias, AI certification readiness, or any topic related to implementing or auditing an AI Management System. Also trigger for questions like "how do I become ISO 42001 certified?", "what controls does ISO 42001 require?", "how do I assess AI risk under 42001?", "what is an AIMS?", or any request involving organisational governance of AI systems, responsible AI frameworks, or AI regulatory compliance aligned to an ISO standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI lifecycle management, AI incident management, AI transparency, AI bias, AI certification readiness, or any topic related to implementing or auditing an AI Management System. Also trigger for questions like "how do I become ISO 42001 certified?", "what controls does ISO 42001 require?", "how do I assess AI risk under 42001?", "what is an AIMS?", or any request involving organisational governance of AI systems, responsible AI frameworks, or AI regulatory compliance aligned to an ISO standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map control, influence, and concern after systems analysis. Use when students need wise agency without being made responsible for everything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map control, influence, and concern after systems analysis. Use when students need wise agency without being made responsible for everything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level embedded systems covering microcontrollers, RTOS, peripheral interfaces, low-power design, bare-metal programming, and embedded Linux.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers deploying anomaly detection systems for industrial control environments using machine learning models trained on OT network baselines, physics-based process models, and behavioral analysis of industrial protocol communications. It addresses building normal behavior profiles for SCADA polling patterns, detecting deviations in Modbus/DNP3/OPC UA traffic, identifying rogue devices, and correlating network anomalies with physical process data from historians.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。