「cross-cutting」の検索結果

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

複数のスキルに共通する行動原則を抽出し、既存ルールとの重複や不足を確認します。根拠と修正文案を示し、利用者の承認後にルールファイルへ反映するスキルです。

• スキル追加後のルール見直し
• 繰り返し現れる原則をまとめたいとき
• 既存ルールの不足や古い記述の確認

Validate domain boundaries -- detect cross-context import violations and aggregate invariant issues. Use when auditing a DDD codebase for leaks between bounded contexts, before merging cross-cutting changes, or as a CI gate to catch boundary erosion early.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Index and router for the C-level advisory bundle: 33 skills covering 14 C-suite roles, orchestration, cross-cutting capabilities, and culture. Use when exploring what the c-level-advisor bundle contains, deciding which advisor skill fits a question, or finding the entry points (cs-onboard interview, chief-of-staff routing, board-meeting protocol).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create OpenShell RFC proposals in rfc/ from a design request. Use when the user asks to write, draft, start, create, or update an RFC, Request for Comments, architecture proposal, API proposal, process proposal, or cross-cutting design proposal that should follow the OpenShell RFC process and template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find recurring concept combinations across the wiki that lack an explicit synthesis page, then create cross-cutting synthesis pages. Use for knowledge synthesis after the vault has accumulated enough material.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for Power BI Project (PBIP) structure, thick and thin reports, project renames, forks, and validation. Use for .pbip, .pbism, .platform, definition.pbir, PBIP vs PBIX, or cross-cutting project operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements one scoped product feature or fix using existing contracts; not upgrades, performance tuning or establishing cross-cutting technical foundations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits cross-cutting codebase health, security and maintainability; not a single-change review or specialist audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-cutting standards for error design, response shapes, error codes, and boundary placement across API, domain, and infrastructure layers. Use when defining error hierarchies, wrapping exceptions, building standardized error responses, or placing error boundaries in layered architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Primary router skill for broad .NET work. Classify the repo by app model and cross-cutting concern first, then switch to the narrowest matching .NET skill instead of staying at a generic layer. USE FOR: general .NET requests without a narrower framework; C# implementation, debugging, review, or refactoring; routing to framework and tooling skills. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; tasks already covered by a narrower .NET skill. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to select, review, or implement Java design and integration patterns — including classic Java design patterns, REST API patterns, Kafka and event-driven patterns, database and persistence patterns, and cross-cutting integration patterns. This should trigger for requests such as Apply Java design patterns; Review REST API patterns; Design Kafka event-driven patterns; Improve database persistence patterns; Add resilient integration patterns. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than $smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than /smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plans/<slug>.md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to "create a test plan", "plan tests", "what should I test", "generate test scenarios", "test plan for this PR", or "what are the test cases".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding cross-cutting concerns to durable functions — structured logging or tracing across all functions, error tracking with Sentry, payload encryption for sensitive data, dependency injection of clients (DB, Stripe, etc.) into function handlers, custom telemetry, or behavior that should apply uniformly across many functions. Covers Inngest middleware lifecycle, creating custom middleware, dependencyInjectionMiddleware, @inngest/middleware-encryption, @inngest/middleware-sentry, and custom middleware patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when references in a .bib file (often from /search-lit) should land in Zotero and Obsidian. Syncs them to the Zotero library, writes Obsidian literature notes and extracts cross-cutting concept notes once enough accumulate. A folder of PDFs is /obsidian-paper-vault.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting work in any divine-* repo (divine-web, divine-mobile, divine-funnelcake, keycast, divine-blossom, divine-router, etc.) or when you've learned a cross-repo fact worth sharing back. The shared divine-context handbook at ~/code/divine/divine-context/ is the source of truth for cross-cutting architecture, Nostr usage, terminology, and the project catalog across the ~50 divine-* repos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes a detailed, executable implementation plan from an approved design or multi-step requirement, including exact files, interfaces, tests, commands, checkpoints, and rollback considerations. Use before touching code for a substantial feature, migration, refactor, or cross-cutting change. Not for a one-file bounded fix or for executing a plan that already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps an unfamiliar or large codebase before implementation by locating entry points, ownership, execution paths, conventions, tests, dependencies, change hotspots, and unresolved questions. Use when onboarding to a repository, scoping a cross-cutting change, preparing a handoff or reusable CodeTour, explaining a subsystem, or when the agent is guessing where behavior lives. Not for diagnosing one reproduced failure or designing a new architecture before the current system is understood.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。