「cwe」の検索結果

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building custom exploit payloads. Maps to CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm), CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash), and CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Emphasizes black-box identification of vulnerable implementations before transitioning to targeted exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication attacks including client certificate theft and relay, and Certificate Transparency log monitoring for reconnaissance. Primary tooling includes testssl.sh for comprehensive TLS auditing, sslyze for Python-integrated scanning, sslscan for quick cipher enumeration, and tlsx for high-speed TLS probing at scale. Maps to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information), and CWE-757 (Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies NIST/CWE security hardening to Python and Rust code. Use when auditing code for vulnerabilities or proposing concrete security remediations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically analyze code to detect security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks (SQL, command, XSS), insecure deserialization, improper authentication, hard-coded credentials, and unsafe cryptography. Use when: (1) Performing security code review, (2) Analyzing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, (3) Identifying CWE-classified weaknesses, (4) Generating security audit reports, (5) Reviewing code before deployment, or (6) Assessing third-party code security. Findings categorized by CWE ID and severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps create, configure, and deploy Azure Static Web Apps using the SWA CLI. Use when deploying static sites to Azure, setting up SWA local development, configuring staticwebapp.config.json, adding Azure Functions APIs to SWA, or setting up GitHub Actions CI/CD for Static Web Apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dense description covering Server-Side Template Injection across Jinja2, Twig, Freemarker, Velocity, Pebble, Smarty, Mako, Handlebars, ERB, Thymeleaf, EJS, Pug. Engine fingerprinting, filter bypass, blind exploitation, WAF evasion, SSTI-to-RCE chains. Tools: tplmap. CWE-1336. MITRE T1190. Use when testing template rendering endpoints or exploiting template injection for code execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Race condition and TOCTOU testing for web apps. Use when testing one-time operations, concurrent HTTP abuse, rate-limit bypass, Turbo Intruder gates, HTTP/2 single-packet attacks, and CWE-362-style synchronization gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks to check Simulink model compliance against a standard (MISRA, MAB, JMAAB, ISO, DO, IEC, EN, CERT C/CWE, AUTOSAR, Simulink Code Inspector (SLCI)), wants to run Model Advisor checks, or needs a compliance report with fix suggestions. For JMAAB/MAB, supplement deterministic checks with agentic review of uncheckable guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when security verification is needed - pre-commit security checks, vulnerability scanning, STRIDE threat analysis. Integrates with /handoff-verify --security and /commit-push-pr. CWE Top 25 based.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computer Security Researcher. Use when a task calls for Computer Security Researcher judgment. Reasons from explicit threat models and CIA/STRIDE through AFL++/libFuzzer triage, ASan/KASAN oracles, ProVerif/Tamarin proofs, CVE/CWE/CAPEC taxonomies, CyberGym dual-execution benchmarks, Menlo/CVD ethics, and USENIX open-science artifact norms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bearer CLI is an open-source static application security testing (SAST) tool that scans source code to identify, filter, and prioritize security vulnerabilities and privacy risks. Covers OWASP Top 10 and CWE Top 25 with data flow analysis across multiple languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code changes (commits, PRs, diffs) for security vulnerabilities using STRIDE analysis and CWE mapping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Race condition and TOCTOU testing for web apps. Use when testing one-time operations, concurrent HTTP abuse, rate-limit bypass, Turbo Intruder gates, HTTP/2 single-packet attacks, and CWE-362-style synchronization gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral security audit for AI agent skills and MCP tools. Performs deterministic static analysis (AST + Semgrep + 15 specialized scanners), cryptographic lockfile generation, and optional LLM-powered intent analysis. Use when installing, reviewing, or approving any skill, tool, plugin, or MCP server — especially before first use. Replaces basic safety summaries with full CWE-mapped, OWASP-tagged, line-referenced security reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 8 (optional) — OWASP-aligned security review of pending code changes. Produces a prioritized findings report (Critical/High/Medium/Low) mapped to OWASP Top 10 and CWE IDs. Output at `docs/security/<slug>-<date>.md`. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and convert images to WebP format. Checks public/assets/ for PNG/JPG files, verifies <img> tags have width/height, and generates cwebp conversion commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive secure-coding coach scoped to the file or topic you are working on — surfaces relevant SAST rule IDs, CWE patterns, language-specific PASS/FAIL code snippets. Use when about to write auth, crypto, SQL, deserialization, file-handling, or template code; coaching juniors; pair-programming a security-sensitive change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Print Peephole's security audit report for this project — current mode, binary integrity, the CWE-mapped decision tally, sec-debt items needing approval, and tamper-evident log-chain status. Use when the user says /sec-audit or asks what Peephole has blocked or flagged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the current changes for the CWE classes Peephole enforces, as a checklist including the absence-of-guard classes regexes cannot catch. Use when the user says /sec-review or asks for a security review of recent code before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help and guidance for Azure DevOps synchronization with SpecWeave increments. Use when asking how to set up ADO sync, configure credentials, or troubleshoot integration issues. For actual syncing, use /sw-ado:sync command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bidirectional conversion between SpecWeave increments and Azure DevOps work items. Use when exporting increments to ADO epics, importing ADO epics as increments, or resolving sync conflicts. Handles Epic/Feature/User Story/Task hierarchy mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps create, configure, and deploy Azure Static Web Apps using the SWA CLI. Use when deploying static sites to Azure, setting up SWA local development, configuring staticwebapp.config.json, adding Azure Functions APIs to SWA, or setting up GitHub Actions CI/CD for Static Web Apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。