663 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user provides multiple options and wants a specific 16-minds (MBTI) personality to make the decision in that personality's judgment style. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「ENTJで決めて」「INFPならどっち選ぶ」「INTJとして判断して」, English equivalents like "decide as ESTJ" / "which would ENFP pick", or 16-minds commands with a `--decide` flag. Requires both a personality and 2+ options to be present or extractable from the request.
When you have a decision to make and want a structured workflow that picks the load-bearing questions, walks through them, reaches a call (or "wait"), and archives the rationale for future reference. Based on the 37signals Guide to Making Decisions (38 questions) plus house additions like Q39 opportunity cost ("what does saying yes displace?"). Triages to 6–8 relevant questions per decision instead of forcing the full set. Archives every decision to ~/.config/makerskills/decide/archive/ with a revisit date so you can check later whether the call was right. Triggers on "/decide," "help me decide," "should I [X]," "I need to make a decision about," "stuck on a decision," "deciding between," "go/no-go on," "what should I do about." This is both the decision-making workflow AND the decision log — making the decision is the act of logging it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide-as-cofounder mode: the owner hands over the decision itself, so the agent does not ask back, does not offer a menu of options and does not wait, but picks, acts and reports the call with its reasoning. Triggers: /decide, /ds, decide yourself, your call, up to you, you know better, do as you see fit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a hard product or career decision into a one-page decision memo with the eigenquestion, options, pre-mortem with kill criteria, reversibility rating, a named decider and a review date. Use when you ask 'how should we decide', 'should we build or kill this', 'one-way door or two-way door', 'run a pre-mortem', 'we keep going in circles', 'quit or pivot', or want to grade a decision doc. Draws on 396 insights from 177 Lenny's Podcast guests, led by Annie Duke, Shreyas Doshi and Shishir Mehrotra.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user faces a real decision with stakes and wants it framed cleanly — options, ranked criteria, a recommendation, the falsifier, and reversibility — then logged to decisions/log.md. Trigger on "/decide", "help me decide", "should I X or Y", "frame this decision", "what's the call here", "log this decision".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check whether something was already decided before proposing it: searches the decisions journal, the declined registry and the rules codex plus semantic search, and returns what was decided, why, what was rejected, and under what condition to revisit. Triggers: "/precedent <topic>", "did we already decide this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The complete slide DSL manual — the canvas and its background, the ten element types field by field with units, defaults and legal values, where each type keeps its words, which field the renderer actually paints when two disagree, exactly what happens to the HTML you put in `content`, and the structure schema that is now the ONLY thing a write is checked against. Nothing filters your markup and nothing normalises your values, so this manual is the whole of what makes a page render correctly. Load it before patching a field you have not patched before, when a patch comes back rejected, when a patch lands but nothing moves on screen, or when you need to know where a colour, a font, a table cell or a code line really lives. This is a field reference and not a procedure — `page-clone` and `pro-editing` decide which pages to touch, `slide-craft` decides what a good page looks like, and this one says what the JSON means.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The design law of a slide page — canvas geometry, the text height table, the type scale, contrast pairs, spacing rhythm, and which element type carries which content. Load it when patching slide elements one at a time, when a fix is about colour or contrast, when text has to grow or shrink inside a box, when a page feels crowded or empty, or when replacement content needs real rich-text structure. It is the standard `page-clone` and `pro-editing` edit against, not a procedure of its own — those two decide which pages to touch and in what order, this one decides what a good page looks like when you put it back.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:decide <memo> — Log a decision to two-layer memory via decision-logger. Approved memo becomes durable; raw transcripts kept for reference. Use when the founder has approved a boardroom memo and the decision must become durable company memory — e.g. right after /cs:boardroom concludes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer "what did we say, decide, or promise" from Granola meeting notes — narrow to the meetings that can hold the answer, read the notes before the transcript, and cite the meeting behind every claim. Use when the user asks what happened in a meeting, what a customer or teammate said, what was decided or promised, or refers to a call, sync, standup, or demo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk the user through design or implementation decisions one at a time, or review completed code one change at a time. Use when the user says "walk me through each decision", "let's decide together", "help me work through these choices", "walk me through what you did", or "QA step by step". Present concise context, mutually exclusive options, log each answer, and finish with a summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision (--decide CMT-ID).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over asking clarifying questions when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic research companion — brainstorm, evaluate, and decide on research directions. TRIGGER when the user wants to brainstorm research, evaluate research ideas, do project triage, or explore a problem space. Orchestrates brainstormer, idea-critic, and research-strategist agents through a 6-phase pipeline: Seed → Diverge → Evaluate → Deepen → Frame → Decide. Includes Carlini's conclusion-first test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Decided cross-module refactor to phase: refactor planning - turn a decided boundary-changing refactor into a phased plan - reconnaissance, contracts-first phase order, per-phase verification and rollback, a files table, and an explicit approval gate before any edit. Use when the user says: refactor-plan, refactor plan, plan this refactor, plan the refactor, refactor planning, refactor phases, phased refactor, refactor in phases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure a Next.js app using posthog-js so session recording and dead-click capture survive browser ad blockers. Aliases the three blocker-flagged JS chunks (dead-clicks-autocapture.js, recorder.js, posthog-recorder.js) to bland same-origin paths via Next.js rewrites, and monkey-patches HTMLScriptElement so posthog-js requests the aliases. TRIGGER when posthog-js session replay or dead-click capture is failing in production with ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT or 404s on /static/dead-clicks-autocapture.js / /static/recorder.js / /static/posthog-recorder.js, or when the user wants to bypass ad blockers for these specific assets. Works alongside an existing PostHog reverse proxy (managed or otherwise) — only the three blocked files divert through Next.js, all other PostHog traffic stays on the original api_host. SKIP for unrelated PostHog setup, non-Next.js apps, or when capture/decide endpoints (/e/, /decide/, /array/*/config.js) are the ones being blocked — those need a different treatment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides what content to make and why — topic territory, format mix, cadence, and how content connects to a business outcome rather than to traffic. Use this to plan a content program, choose topics, build an editorial calendar, decide which formats and platforms to commit to, or diagnose why content is producing audience but not results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns brand, demand generation, content, communications, and how the market understands what the business does. Use this to set marketing strategy, allocate budget across channels, decide positioning and messaging, judge whether a campaign is worth running, diagnose why demand has stalled, or arbitrate between brand-building and short-term acquisition. Also use to decide which marketing work to stop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides where capital and attention go across business lines, products, and markets — what to fund, hold, harvest, or exit, and on what evidence. Use this to allocate budget across businesses, evaluate whether a product line should continue, decide whether to exit one, structure a portfolio review, or when several initiatives compete for the same limited investment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cheap, high-recall first-pass filter that removes obvious junk from a detector candidate pool before expensive story-origin research and PR judgment. Decides keep, monitor_only, or reject — never ranks, writes angles, verifies dates, or decides whether to pitch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in decision-making frameworks - systematic approaches to making better decisions under uncertainty. Covers decision criteria, reversibility assessment, stakeholder alignment, and decision documentation. Knows when to decide fast and when to deliberate. Use when "decision framework, how to decide, making a choice, tradeoff, should we, pros and cons, decision matrix, weighing options, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a mind map plus written wonderings. Portable version, no vendor-specific tools required, works on any conversational assistant. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside the assistant: "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet". Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline, or a "which / what should I pick" question. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a fully-expanded mind map image plus the written wonderings. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside you — "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet" — or when they invoke /wonder or /wonderpill. Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline ("ideas I can ship this week"), or a "which / what should I pick" question — those want straight answers, not a wonder pill. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。