「deliberation」の検索結果

Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for bounded reasoning, partial planning, commitment policy, deliberation cost, and reconsideration-threshold design instead of assuming free deliberation. NOT for exhaustive planning, static optimization, or domains where reconsideration cost is irrelevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The LAW a council SEAT is bound by — deliberation protocol, pact obligations, governance, and decision-ledger recording — the discipline half of a seat. Trigger when: - Holding a seat on a bound council (architect, lead-maintainer, process-auditor, or a summoned guest). - Depositing an independent assessment, routing a decision, or recording assent or a finding. - Auditing whether the council honored the pact, the delegation table, or the barring lifecycle. - Prompt contains: /council, council seat, deliberation protocol, pact, delegation table, decision ledger, barring, merge-consent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for bounded reasoning, partial planning, commitment policy, deliberation cost, and reconsideration-threshold design instead of assuming free deliberation. NOT for exhaustive planning, static optimization, or domains where reconsideration cost is irrelevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drain acc's deliberation queue — open/waiting brain_frames checkpointed by headless runs — via acc_act(runtime="continue").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:brief <topic> — Generate a one-page strategy brief from an office-hours intake. First step in the strategic sprint pipeline. Use when a strategic question needs to be framed before boardroom deliberation — e.g. locking options, assumptions, and success criteria for a pricing change or a market-entry decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Founder-mode executive team. 13 cs-* C-suite agents (CFO, CMO, CRO, CPO, COO, CHRO, CISO, GC, CDO, CAIO, CCO, VPE, Chief of Staff) and 21 /cs:* slash commands for forcing-question office hours, multi-role boardroom deliberation, strategic sprint pipeline, and meta routing. Use when the founder needs a virtual executive team, when invoking /cs:* commands, or when orchestrating multi-role decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convene the Council of High Intelligence — multi-persona deliberation with historical thinkers for deeper analysis of complex problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-agnostic multi-LLM deliberation. Three phases — independent responses, cross-model anonymized ranking, chairman synthesis. Credentials come from explicit plugin configuration or pro-workflow-specific CLI variables. Persists transcript to a wiki page when --wiki <slug> is passed. Use when the user wants multiple AI perspectives, consensus-building, or the "LLM Council" approach for high-stakes reviews, plan critique, or contested learning rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before heavy deliberation, classify the decision as cheap or costly to undo; decide two-way doors fast and stage one-way doors to preserve options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective deliberation framework for complex scientific questions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol running a structured 6-phase deliberation with isolated C-suite contributions to prevent groupthink. Use when making major strategic decisions or resolving cross-functional disagreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two-layer memory for executive decisions, separating raw deliberation from approved decisions to prevent hallucinated consensus. Use when logging decisions, reviewing past decisions, or checking overdue action items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convenes a multi-LLM expert panel to pressure-test hard-to-reverse decisions. Use when reversibility score is low and adversarial review is warranted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drain acc's deliberation queue — open/waiting brain_frames checkpointed by headless runs — via acc_act(runtime="continue").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementation guide for CNIL cookie guidelines compliance. References the EUR 150M Google fine and EUR 60M Meta fine. Covers equal prominence accept/reject buttons, cookie wall prohibition, 6-month reconsent intervals, essential cookies exemption, and detailed CNIL Deliberation No. 2020-091 requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/council", "council", "deliberate", "multi-perspective decision", "트레이드오프 분석", "위원회 소집", "여러 관점으로 검토", or wants deep multi-perspective deliberation with tradeoff mapping. Combines tribunal (structured adversarial review), agent-council (external LLM opinions), dev-scan (community sentiment), and step-back (meta-level review) into a unified decision-making committee. Uses Agent Teams for real peer-to-peer debate with iterative step-back moderation loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated marketing deliberation that applies documented public frameworks through clearly labeled simulated advisors, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a decision. Use when the user wants multiple expert lenses on one bounded marketing question. NOT FOR: factual claims about a living person's private views, primary research (use suede-customer-research), or executing the selected tactic (route to the relevant public Suede skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convene the Council of High Intelligence — multi-persona deliberation with historical thinkers for deeper analysis of complex problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial deliberation process for making decisions. Spawns advocate agents for each option who argue their cases before a judge (you) who renders a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent collaboration session. Brings 2-4 agent perspectives into one discussion for architecture decisions and trade-off analysis. Use when asked "should we X or Y?", "let's discuss", or "design review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing architectural friction and proposing deepening refactors (shallow modules → deep modules) for testability and AI-navigability. Triggers on "improve architecture", "find deepening opportunities", "where is this codebase shallow", "architecture review". Emits structured candidates + precise patches; delegates ALL rendering to mk:preview. NOT for diagram/HTML rendering (see mk:preview); NOT for trade-off deliberation (see mk:party); NOT for plan critique (see mk:plan-ceo-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。