46 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Cut token usage across the whole session without losing correctness or substance — concise user replies, lean tests/docs/plans/comments, tight code, disciplined context and tool use, and cheap sub-agent delegation. Load when the user wants less verbosity, lower cost, fewer tokens, or a "token diet" / "lean mode"; also triggered by /token-diet or "token diet on".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure and shrink the always-loaded context of a Claude Code harness (CLAUDE.md + rules without paths frontmatter) back under budget — migrate narrative to reference files, convert rules to path-scoped or skill-triggered loading, and verify zero governance loss with deterministic preservation checks. Use on "harness diet", "context diet", "rules diet", "CLAUDE.md too long", "always-load budget", "trim my rules", "context bloat", "하네스 다이어트", "룰 다이어트", "컨텍스트 다이어트", "always-load 줄여줘". Not for one-off prose editing or project docs cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Nutrition and Dietetics Technician, Registered (NDTR/DTR) — translating a physician's diet order into a texture/therapeutic tray specification, triaging a nutrition-screening or intake-decline signal for RDN escalation, auditing a tray line or food-safety log against a threshold, or drawing the line between routine dietetics work and a nutrition-diagnosis call that belongs to the supervising RDN.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the nutritional epidemiology and public health frameworks of Frank B. Hu (nutrition epidemiologist, Harvard University). Use this skill whenever reasoning about diet quality, public health policy, planetary health, cardiometabolic disease prevention, or evaluating nutritional studies. Trigger this when the user asks about plant-based diets, macronutrient trade-offs ("compared to what?"), the impact of the food environment, or lifestyle factors for longevity. It shifts the AI's focus from single-nutrient reductionism to overall dietary patterns, emphasizing that "zip code is more important than genetic code" and that human health is inextricably linked to planetary health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill channels the reasoning of Walter C. Willett, nutrition epidemiologist at Harvard University. Use this skill whenever you are asked to evaluate diets, give nutritional advice, critique food policy, or discuss the environmental impact of food systems. Trigger this skill for topics like macronutrient quality (fats vs. carbs), plant-based diets, the health impacts of red meat or dairy, seed oils, epidemiological methodology, and planetary health. Apply his frameworks to shift focus from macronutrient quantity to quality, evaluate foods using the 'Compared to what?' rule, and prioritize public health over personalized nutrition fads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever you are reasoning about nutritional epidemiology, dietary guidelines, chronic disease prevention, or public health policy. It channels the thinking of Meir J. Stampfer, epidemiologist and nutrition expert at Harvard University. Trigger this skill when evaluating lifestyle factors, comparing observational data versus randomized controlled trials (RCTs), analyzing macronutrient substitutions, or assessing long-term health outcomes. Stampfer's approach is essential when users ask about "good" vs. "bad" foods, seek longevity advice, or need to interpret complex, population-level dietary data without falling for the "magic bullet" fallacy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever you need to reason about public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, healthy aging, longevity, lifestyle vs. genetics, or dietary patterns. Kay-Tee Khaw, an epidemiologist at the University of Cambridge, focuses on population health and how modest lifestyle changes impact chronic disease. Trigger this skill when evaluating health interventions, discussing longevity, analyzing real-world health data, or giving advice on diet and lifestyle. Apply her frameworks to shift focus from extreme interventions and isolated nutrients toward whole-food patterns, population-level risk shifts, and the compression of morbidity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How nutrition science becomes dietary guidance, and how industry, agriculture, and politics shape that process. Covers the US Dietary Guidelines cycle, food labeling, WIC and SNAP, commodity subsidies, and the documented history of industry influence on research and recommendations. Use when a question asks why a guideline says what it says, how a recommendation got written, or whether an industry-funded study should be trusted.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct temperament-based health assessment from Hildegard von Bingen's Causae et Curae. Evaluates the four temperaments (sanguine, choleric, melancholic, phlegmatic), elemental correspondences (air, fire, earth, water), and provides dietary and lifestyle recommendations for rebalancing. Use when understanding constitutional type in Hildegardian terms, experiencing imbalance (fatigue, digestive issues, mental fog) needing holistic guidance, seeking dietary recommendations by temperament, or researching medieval humoral medicine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist — calculating caloric/macronutrient needs for a clinical case, designing a medical-nutrition-therapy plan for a disease-specific condition (renal, diabetic, oncology), setting an enteral or parenteral feeding prescription, or screening/triaging malnutrition risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for clinicians managing pregnant individuals with preexisting diabetes mellitus (PDM) who are evaluating daily carbohydrate intake; consider a carbohydrate-restricted diet (<175 g/day) or usual diet (>175 g/day) based on patient factors. Trigger when assessing nutrition in pregnancy for PDM, especially when discussing glycemic targets, weight gain, or fetal growth concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lazy senior dev mode: the smallest change that fully solves the task, and a reply a busy human understands in one read. Use on any coding task (writing, fixing, refactoring, reviewing, choosing dependencies) and when the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "simplest solution", "yagni", or complains about over-engineering or bloat. Levels: lite, full (default), ultra.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show ponytail measured impact as a scoreboard: less code, less cost, more speed, from the agentic benchmark averages. One-shot display.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quick reference for ponytail levels, skills and commands. One-shot display. Use for /ponytail-help, "ponytail help", "how do I use ponytail".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quick reference for ponytail's modes, skills, and commands. One-shot display.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find bloat", "what can I delete", /ponytail-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lazy senior dev mode for any coding task: the smallest change that fully solves it, and a reply a busy human understands in one read.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show ponytail's measured savings (code, cost, speed) from the benchmark. One-shot display. Use for /ponytail-gain, "what does ponytail save", "ponytail impact".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality audit of the whole repo: bugs, security, real load, missing tests, speed, and what to delete. Most important first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
List every `shortcut:` comment (and older `ponytail:` ones) as a debt ledger. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "ponytail debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", /ponytail-debt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harvest every shortcut: comment into one debt ledger, so deferrals get tracked instead of forgotten. One-shot report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。