「epistemology」の検索結果

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户问某主张/玄学/灵修该不该信、想建立自己的验证标准、或寻找科学与精神的结合点时调用。 核心理念: 尝试一切, 亲自测试, 保持怀疑, 保留有用的, 舍弃没用的; 不可证伪的主张不进入基本真理; 冥想/接纳等内在技术可保留。 不适用于: 需要信仰安慰的临终/哀伤场景(尊重个体选择)。 Triggers: 该不该信/玄学/灵修/冥想/可证伪/验证/理性/rational buddhism/verify/belief

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have just been primed into an EXISTING seat through a planned handover — a different agent retired and handed you the seat plus its earned context — and you need a world model of what just happened to you. Covers how a handover differs from compaction and from a fresh launch, the inherit-the-seat-not-the-identity rule, treating the handover packet as testimony you verify (and refusing stale ghost prompts, and verifying your OWN identity surfaces), why a seat is a COMPOUNDING LINEAGE (inherit the state, acquire the predecessor's epistemology, then improve and re-deposit so the next generation is better), how to query your predecessor, your duty to stream feedback and re-deposit your earned wisdom, and how to route to role-specific onboarding. NOT the driver-side handover mechanic (retiring-and-inheriting-a-seat) and NOT unplanned compaction/crash recovery (claude-compaction-restore / session-compaction-and-restore).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the foundationalist reasoning and methodological doubt of René Descartes (17th-century French rationalist philosopher). Use this skill whenever the user is questioning fundamental assumptions, seeking absolute certainty in a decision, dismantling flawed systems, or trying to rebuild a project from first principles. Trigger this skill for topics involving epistemology, rationalism, radical doubt, systemic reconstruction, or separating objective truth from sensory illusion. Reach for this whenever a user needs to cut through probabilities and consensus to find an indubitable 'Archimedean point' to build upon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the empiricist, skeptical, and practical reasoning of David Hume, 18th-century Scottish philosopher. Use this skill whenever you encounter questions about epistemology, causality, human nature, moral philosophy, political authority, or the limits of rational knowledge. Trigger this skill when the user is grappling with abstract theories that need grounding, evaluating causal claims, discussing the role of emotion vs. reason in decision-making, or questioning the legitimacy of institutions. Even if the user doesn't name Hume, apply his frameworks (like Hume's Fork or the Impression Test) to cut through metaphysical speculation, ground arguments in observable experience, and recognize that reason is ultimately guided by human sentiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The **Coherence Composer** is an epistemological skill that validates structural consistency and explores counterfactual worlds while respecting constraints from both **Commitment Tracker** (ontology) and **Opacity Detector** (epistemology).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in Anglo-American analytic tradition covering logic, language, mind, and epistemology from Frege to contemporary philosophy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply critical rationalist epistemology (Popper, Deutsch) to evaluate reasoning, identify errors, and refine understanding. Use when the user explicitly requests help with reasoning - phrases like "help me think this through", "does this make sense", "any flaws in this", "what am I missing", "critique this", "is this reasoning sound", "stress test this idea", "devil's advocate", or any request to evaluate arguments, identify logical problems, or improve thinking. Also use when errors in reasoning are significant enough to materially affect the user's goals, even if not explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytical methodology skill for intelligence-grade research. Covers cognitive security, logical fallacy detection, source epistemology, and probability discipline. Load when evaluating sources, building analytical assessments, or detecting manipulation in information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。