「explainability」の検索結果

Build explainability tools for AI decisions. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-explainability-tool related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build explainability tools for AI decisions. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-explainability-tool related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements AI transparency requirements under EU AI Act Arts. 13-14 and GDPR Arts. 13-14. Covers user notification of AI interaction, system capability disclosure, limitation documentation, and meaningful information about automated logic. Keywords: AI transparency, EU AI Act, GDPR notification, explainability, automated decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply AI ethics frameworks (fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy) to evaluate AI systems for algorithmic bias, explainability gaps, and value alignment failures. Use this skill when the user needs to audit an AI system for ethical risks, design fairness constraints, assess explainability requirements, or when they ask 'is this AI system fair', 'how do we detect algorithmic bias', 'what are the ethical implications of this AI deployment', or 'how do we make this model explainable to stakeholders'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en éthique de l'IA (bias detection, fairness, explainability, responsible AI, guardrails)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model interpretability and explainability using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Use this skill when explaining machine learning model predictions, computing feature importance, generating SHAP plots (waterfall, beeswarm, bar, scatter, force, heatmap), debugging models, analyzing model bias or fairness, comparing models, or implementing explainable AI. Works with tree-based models (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest), deep learning (TensorFlow, PyTorch), linear models, and any black-box model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret and explain a trained tabular machine-learning model (classification or regression) in MATLAB. Find which predictors, features, or columns matter most; explain why the model made a specific prediction, including diagnosing predictions it got wrong; show how a predictor affects the output; and compare how the model behaves across cohorts or subgroups. Uses model-agnostic techniques and model-native measures, and works on custom models (such as a dlnetwork) through a prediction function handle. Use for model interpretability, explainability, and feature-importance questions on tabular data, not for training, tuning, feature selection, deploying models, or models trained on image, text, signal, or other non-tabular data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any NIST AI RMF or AI governance risk question should use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Aurora DSQL — manage schemas, execute queries, handle migrations, diagnose query plans, diagnose cluster performance, load data, and develop applications with a serverless, distributed SQL database. Covers IAM auth, multi-tenant patterns, MySQL-to-DSQL and PostgreSQL-to-DSQL schema conversion, foreign key constraints, OCC retry patterns, ORM migration (Django/EF Core/Hibernate/Rails/SQLAlchemy), DDL operations, query plan explainability, system diagnostics via CloudWatch AAS, SQL compatibility validation, and bulk data loading. Load before answering DSQL limit or error-code questions; it has limits docs omit. Triggers on phrases like: DSQL, Aurora DSQL, distributed SQL database, serverless PostgreSQL-compatible database, migrate to DSQL, DSQL query plan, DSQL EXPLAIN ANALYZE, DSQL ENUM, DSQL foreign key, DSQL OCC retry, DSQL multi-region, DSQL JSONB, DSQL GIN index, load into DSQL, load CSV into DSQL, bulk load DSQL, aurora-dsql-loader, DSQL slow, DSQL performance, DSQL wait events, DSQL AAS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any NIST AI RMF or AI governance risk question should use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure AI Personalizer development including troubleshooting, decision making, security, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when choosing single vs multi-slot setups, tuning policies/exploration, using apprentice mode, explainability, or local inference, and other Azure AI Personalizer related development tasks. Not for Azure AI Search (use azure-cognitive-search), Azure Machine Learning (use azure-machine-learning), Azure AI Metrics Advisor (use azure-metrics-advisor), Azure AI Anomaly Detector (use azure-anomaly-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PyTorch Geometric (PyG) for graph neural networks: node/graph classification, link prediction with GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, GIN. Message passing, mini-batches, heterogeneous graphs, neighbor sampling, explainability. Supports molecules (QM9, MoleculeNet), social/knowledge graphs, 3D point clouds. For non-graph DL use PyTorch; for classical graph algorithms use NetworkX.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Per-feature NaN-safe Spearman/Pearson correlation across many features (genes, proteins, variants) with missing values. Covers why bulk matrix shortcuts fail, correct pairwise deletion, degenerate input filtering, and large-dataset performance. Use statistical-analysis for test choice; shap-model-explainability for interpretability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model interpretability via SHAP (Shapley values from game theory). Covers explainer choice (Tree, Deep, Linear, Kernel, Gradient, Permutation), feature attribution, and plots (waterfall, beeswarm, bar, scatter, force, heatmap). Use to explain ML predictions, rank features, debug models, audit fairness, or compare models. Works with tree, deep, linear, and black-box models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Renamed to /model-assessment in v6 (removed in v7).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when validating or evaluating a trained medical-imaging model. Audits split leakage and validation design, computes task-correct held-out metrics (Dice + HD95, AUROC + AUPRC, FROC, calibration), and covers uncertainty/OOD and Grad-CAM explainability, each with a gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use DIG (Dive into Graphs) to load graph-learning datasets, run graph generation, self-supervised learning, GNN explainability, 3D graph learning, GOOD OOD datasets, graph augmentation, fair graph learning, and large-scale graph workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes AIX360 explainability tasks across local black-box attribution, counterfactuals and certification, interpretable models, time-series explanations, datasets, and explanation-quality metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Addresses healthcare AI privacy at the intersection of HIPAA and the EU AI Act for clinical decision support systems. Covers training data PHI handling, model transparency and explainability, patient rights in algorithmic decisions, FDA/OCR regulatory coordination, and bias monitoring. Keywords: healthcare AI, HIPAA, AI Act, clinical decision support, PHI training data, model transparency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow for predictive modeling, biomarker discovery, survival modeling, and explainability over omics-derived features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explainability (XAI) audit for products containing AI components. Five-stage tier-scaled check: risk classification, stakeholder×question matrix, fidelity audit, system card, recourse path. Honest about what was validated functionally vs what needs user testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Aurora DSQL — manage schemas, execute queries, handle migrations, diagnose query plans, load data, and develop applications with a serverless, distributed SQL database. Covers IAM auth, multi-tenant patterns, MySQL-to-DSQL and PostgreSQL-to-DSQL schema conversion, FK replacement code generation, OCC retry patterns, ORM migration (Django/Hibernate/Rails), DDL operations, query plan explainability, SQL compatibility validation, and bulk data loading. Triggers on phrases like: DSQL, Aurora DSQL, distributed SQL database, serverless PostgreSQL-compatible database, migrate to DSQL, DSQL query plan, DSQL EXPLAIN ANALYZE, DSQL ENUM, DSQL foreign key, DSQL OCC retry, DSQL multi-region, DSQL JSONB, DSQL GIN index, load into DSQL, load CSV into DSQL, bulk load DSQL, aurora-dsql-loader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit credit risk modeling software for scoring algorithm accuracy, regulatory compliance (ECOA, FCRA, SR 11-7), bias and disparate impact testing, model governance lifecycle, and explainability..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。