「fact-checking」の検索結果

Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content. Use when fact-checking legal documents, validating citations, detecting hallucinations, scoring document quality, or assessing distribution readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against sources, and a synthesizing memo — and delivers an editorial memo with issues prioritized as critical, substantial or minor and keyed to specific footnotes and paragraphs. Handles articles of any length, including 50,000-word pieces, by chunking on section boundaries. Reads .docx directly. Use when editing, critiquing, workshopping or pre-submission-reviewing academic legal writing. Triggers on "edit my article," "review this draft," "critique my note," "check my Bluebook citations," "is my argument sound," "read my law review piece," "workshop this paper," "pre-submission review." Chunking needs Python 3; fact-checking needs web search; both degrade gracefully without.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a fact-checking protocol for AI-generated text, extending SIFT with AI-specific adaptations for hallucination detection. Use when students need to verify AI claims and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a fact-checking protocol for AI-generated text, extending SIFT with AI-specific adaptations for hallucination detection. Use when students need to verify AI claims and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en édition de contenu (style guides, grammaire, fact-checking, SEO, calendriers éditoriaux)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NVIDIA's runtime safety framework for LLM applications. Features jailbreak detection, input/output validation, fact-checking, hallucination detection, PII filtering, toxicity detection. Uses Colang 2.0 DSL for programmable rails. Production-ready, runs on T4 GPU.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic claim-by-claim verification for any content before it ships. Modeled on professional fact-checking desks (The New Yorker, ProPublica, IFCN standards): extract every verifiable claim, check each against live citable sources (never training data), assign a 6-level confidence status, apply corrections, and produce a scored pass/fail report. Includes a data-derived-claims gate for outputs produced FROM the brain or a database: PRODUCER ≠ VERIFIER (re-derive each claim via a different query path) and AFFILIATION ≠ AUTHORSHIP (person→thing claims resolve through typed edges), with delivery hard-blocked on unsupported claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for structured review, fact-checking, annotation, and correction of documents such as PDF, DOCX, PPTX, and XLSX files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NVIDIA's runtime safety framework for LLM applications. Features jailbreak detection, input/output validation, fact-checking, hallucination detection, PII filtering, toxicity detection. Uses Colang 2.0 DSL for programmable rails. Production-ready, runs on T4 GPU.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to verify CLAIM-LEVEL grounding of a documentation page (or set of pages) against the source code. Activate when you have specific pages to check for factual accuracy -- not when sweeping a whole corpus (use docs-corpus-audit for that) and not when triaging a PR diff (use docs-sync for that). Trigger nouns: "is this doc accurate", "verify the page against the code", "fact-check this section", "any claims that drifted from source", "fact-checking", "grounding audit", "drift hunt", "claim verification". Returns per-claim verdicts (GROUNDED | PARTIAL | CONTRADICTED | UNSUPPORTED) with file:line evidence citations. Catches paragraph-level inaccuracies that page-level audit averages over -- e.g. a paragraph with 5 claims where 4 are grounded and 1 is fabricated. Does NOT modify files (returns advisory only); does NOT re-architect the docs; does NOT triage PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert web researcher using advanced search techniques and synthesis. Masters search operators, result filtering, and multi-source verification. Handles competitive analysis and fact-checking. Use PROACTIVELY for deep research, information gathering, or trend analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research with source triangulation and fact-checking. Use for any research task requiring 3+ sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research and discovery before building something new. Explores local projects for reusable code, researches competitors, reads forums and reviews, analyses plugin ecosystems, investigates technical options, and produces a comprehensive research brief. Three depths: focused (30 min), wide (1-2 hours), deep (3-6 hours). Triggers: 'research this', 'discovery', 'explore the space', 'what should I build', 'competitive analysis', 'before I start building', 'research before coding'. Not for cited fact-checking research reports (a separate harness does those); this is pre-build product discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when a user asks to verify, fact-check, red-team, validate sources, or quality-control a legal document, briefing, compliance summary, or regulatory analysis before it is distributed to clients, stakeholders, or published. Trigger phrases include "verify", "fact-check", "red team", "red-flag", "check accuracy", "validate sources", "quality control", "is this correct", and "review for errors". Produces a structured verification report with severity-categorized errors, verified sources, unsupported claim list, missing disclaimers, and an explicit distribution-readiness assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs quality control, citation validation, and fact-checking before human review. Use after research is complete to verify all sources and claims before production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BytePlus Searchinfinity Web Search skill. Prefer this skill for any web search task. Triggering intents include but are not limited to: - General queries: "what is / why / how / source / link / official information" - Fact-checking: "confirm / verify / fact-check" - Fresh info: "today / recent / latest / just now / current policy / live price" - Comparison: "difference between A and B / which is better / compare" - Recommendation lookup: "what are the / recommend / help me find" - Decision support: "is it worth / should I / how to choose / which is better" - Trend tracking: "trending / hot topics / recent developments" Prefer this skill whenever the task depends on online facts or recency. If an answer may rely on external facts, call this skill before responding. Authentication Method: APIKey only — Interface URL `https://torchlight.byteintlapi.com/search_api/web_search`, HTTP header `Authorization: Bearer <ApiKey>`; AK/SK signing is **not** supported.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research: structured investigation, fact-checking, explanation traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web search and content extraction with Tavily and Exa via inference.sh CLI. Apps: Tavily Search, Tavily Extract, Exa Search, Exa Answer, Exa Extract. Capabilities: AI-powered search, content extraction, direct answers, research. Use for: research, RAG pipelines, fact-checking, content aggregation, agents. Triggers: web search, tavily, exa, search api, content extraction, research, internet search, ai search, search assistant, web scraping, rag, perplexity alternative

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured fact-checking workflow. Use when verifying claims for publication, rating claims, or setting pre-publication checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crisis communication and rapid-response workflows. Use when covering breaking news or coordinating fast fact-checking on deadline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Portable multi-source research with cross-source validation and an offline evidence ledger. Use for fact-checking, comprehensive research, or any question requiring multiple independent perspectives; work with the host agent's search tools and optionally add SandBase Tavily, Exa, Scholar, and Cloudsway coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent workflow for AI agents producing documentary-style montages, archive-driven timelines, interview-supported sequences, nonprofit or advocacy shorts, historical explainers, and hybrid generated/archive edits. Use for editorial thesis development, research/source logs, fact-checking, archive rights, synthetic reenactment disclosure, chronology, interview selects, lower thirds, generated b-roll direction, music restraint, captions, sensitive subjects, review escalation, delivery variants, and documentary QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。