「feature-build」の検索結果

Help users move from reactive feature-building to strategic resource allocation by applying rigorous scoring, financial modeling, and portfolio balancing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to author one new tdmcp MCP tool the house way — the file shape (XImpl + registerX), the Python-bridge pattern (buildPayloadScript/parsePythonReport over executePythonScript), the result helpers (errorResult/guardTd/jsonResult/structuredResult), fail-forward error handling, ESM/.js + Biome style, and the offline msw unit test that proves it. Load this whenever building, extending, reviewing, or testing a tdmcp tool file under src/tools/** (and its test under tests/unit/**). Use it for every Phase-13 / v0.5.0 feature-build tool and any re-run after a gate failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ONE tdmcp tool from a spec — the canonical file pattern (Zod schema + …Impl + register… ToolRegistrar), a bridge Python payload via buildPayloadScript, and an offline msw unit test — touching only new files, never shared registries. Use when coding/implementing/writing a tdmcp tool, generator, effect, control, CHOP/TOP/SOP builder, or Python bridge work, especially when several features are built in parallel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates single-task implementation pipeline: plan → test → build → review. Shipping is an explicit follow-up. Use for feature work, plan execution, or fixes scoped to a single task. NOT for green-field product builds (see mk:autobuild); NOT for auto-invoked workflow orchestration (see mk:workflow-orchestrator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to author one new tdmcp MCP tool the house way — the file shape (XImpl + registerX), the Python-bridge pattern (buildPayloadScript/parsePythonReport over executePythonScript), the result helpers (errorResult/guardTd/jsonResult/structuredResult), fail-forward error handling, ESM/.js + Biome style, and the offline msw unit test that proves it. Load this whenever building, extending, reviewing, or testing a tdmcp tool file under src/tools/** (and its test under tests/unit/**). Use it for every Phase-13 / v0.5.0 feature-build tool and any re-run after a gate failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Android indie idea workflow — feature-build phase only (no monetization). Phased — discover (if no idea) → generate 2 candidates → refine scope (offline/online, sharing, MVP vs full, core-value features) → risk/reward/tradeoff analysis when scoping down → emit idea brief. Use for greenfield app concepts, new feature ideation, idea discovery, or pre-design discovery before writing a design document. Triggers — new app idea, feature concept, indie dev brainstorm, validate idea, refine idea, what should I build, find an app idea, idea pipeline, I have no idea, help me find an app idea, scope down, MVP scoping, core value features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ONE tdmcp tool from a spec — the canonical file pattern (Zod schema + …Impl + register… ToolRegistrar), a bridge Python payload via buildPayloadScript, and an offline msw unit test — touching only new files, never shared registries. Use when coding/implementing/writing a tdmcp tool, generator, effect, control, CHOP/TOP/SOP builder, or Python bridge work, especially when several features are built in parallel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。