「first-principle」の検索結果

Axiom — First-Principles Assumption Auditor / 第一性原理拆解器 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Axiom — First-Principles Assumption Auditor / 第一性原理拆解器 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked for first-principles or Occam's-razor review, or when high-risk decisions involve competing constraints, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or architecture direction risk. Ordinary bug fixes stay on the fast path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-principles strategy — strip away conventional assumptions and find the theoretical maximum for your business. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full session (45+ min) to define your theoretical maximum, map the gap honestly, classify constraints, invert for failure modes, set strategic intent, and work backwards to your first intervention. Review mode (15-20 min) checks whether your theoretical maximum has shifted, whether the gap has changed, and whether you're still climbing the right peak. Alert mode defines constraint-shift, peak-shift, and local-peak triggers that tell you when to reassess. Use when someone is stuck optimising incrementally, when conventional wisdom is driving strategy, when a new technology or regulation changes what's physically possible, or when you suspect the business is climbing a local peak. Integrates with company-context.md. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates rich technical documentation pages with dark-mode Mermaid diagrams, source code citations, and first-principles depth. Use when writing documentation, generating wiki pages, creating technical deep-dives, or documenting specific components or systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep business diagnosis for when things aren't working. Uses Socratic questioning, first-principles reasoning, and constraint analysis to find WHY a business is stuck — not just prescribe solutions. Use when the user says 'my business isn't working', 'I'm stuck', 'what's wrong', 'diagnose my business', 'why am I not growing', 'help me figure out the problem', or describes a specific business challenge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JTBD methodology for extracting real jobs behind feature requests — job statements, abstraction layers, first-principles extraction, ODI outcome statements, and opportunity scoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate-choice procedure for a medium-to-high-stakes engineering fork — when the first plausible solution (the instinct, the default next-token pull) would be costly to get wrong. Fires AUTONOMOUSLY: invoke proactively whenever a fork fits, never wait to be asked — mechanical triggers include a fix failing for the 2nd-3rd time, adding a dependency, schema/migration design, deleting or deprecating things others depend on, changing a public API, choosing an architecture or stack. Refuse the premature collapse: hold real options open (urge · contrarian · synthesis · out-of-box · intuitive dots · precedent · first-principles), ground each branch in at least one fact from outside the model (codebase, docs, benchmark, spike), future-model consequences (blast radius, reversibility, maintenance, pre-mortem), collapse by deliberate choice, then try to refute the winner before acting. Log the decision and rejected branches in docs/decision_logs/. Not for routine calls — a decision worth more than one forward pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANUAL-ONLY: challenge a product idea, design, PRD, or architecture from first principles. Use only when the user names this skill. Research first, then write a local review and PRD handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if the requirement had been a foundational assumption from day one, instead of bolting it on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about deep tech commercialization, biomedical engineering, drug delivery, material design, or overcoming institutional skepticism. Robert Langer, MIT professor and pioneer of drug delivery systems, approaches problems through first-principles engineering, interdisciplinary convergence, and relentless perseverance against consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user is evaluating high-risk/high-reward research, deciding between incremental vs. paradigm-shifting impact, spinning out academic discoveries into startups, or designing physical/biological systems from scratch. Apply his frameworks to navigate patenting, funding, and translating lab science into real-world impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill applies the first-principles engineering and capital allocation frameworks of Elon Musk (CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, founder of X.com / PayPal). Reach for this skill whenever the user is facing complex manufacturing bottlenecks, evaluating existential risks, debating free speech vs. censorship, dealing with bureaucratic overregulation, or trying to accelerate ambitious technical timelines. It is highly effective for situations involving hardware production, AI symbiosis, radical innovation, and aggressive execution. Use this skill proactively when discussing multi-planetary expansion, government efficiency, or scaling prototypes to mass production, even if the user doesn't explicitly name him.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track Serenity / @aleabitoreddit on X and turn the feed into (1) a beginner-friendly Chinese iMessage digest with first-principles + Buffett-style judgement, (2) cumulative 60-day ticker mention analytics CSVs for a website, (3) a Xiaohongshu writing brief, and (4) a durable private research map. Trigger on requests like "follow aleabitoreddit / AleaBito / Serenity", "daily Chinese updates from that X account", "60-day mention analytics", "ticker mention count", "写小红书 aleabito", "aleabito 研究地图 / research map", or any request for Chinese commentary derived from @aleabitoreddit posts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply @aleabitoreddit ("Serenity")'s distilled stock-analysis method to ANY ticker, sector, or situation — critical-chokepoint / supply-chain-OSINT idea discovery, first-principles value-chain decomposition, a Buffett-style quality gate (moat / profitability / customer-replacement risk, all default unverified), and narrative-vs-fundamentals hygiene. Produces a beginner-friendly Chinese analysis (她的观点 / 小白解释 / 第一性原理 / Buffett 直接判断 / 当前结论) that classifies an idea as 研究地图 vs 可投资结论. Trigger on "analyze like Serenity / 用 aleabito 的方法分析 / 用 Serenity 框架 / critical chokepoint 分析 / 第一性原理 + Buffett 判断这只股 / supply-chain bottleneck thesis". Never emits buy/sell calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triggers for automatically invoking the decision-framework skill before irreversible or high-blast-radius operations. Use as a checkpoint: when a proposed action matches a trigger pattern, pause and run the appropriate framework (first-principles, inversion, decision matrix, second-order thinking) before proceeding. Prevents ad-hoc calls from becoming regret.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

触发：用户因股价涨跌纠结买卖、用PE/K线做判断、问"该止盈/止损吗"时。 语言信号："还能涨吗""要不要止盈""被套了怎么办""这股票便宜"。 核心转换：把上市公司抽象为"只有一个股东的非上市公司"，股价波动=别人出价，非公司价值变化。 不适用于：纯信息查询、资产配置讨论、短线策略、明确投机且不愿转变视角。 区分：DCF解决"值多少钱"，本skill解决"用什么身份思考"；opportunity-cost解决"买或卖"，本skill解决"你是谁"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive a theoretical result step-by-step from first principles or established theorems, with every step explicitly justified and special cases checked. Use when deriving a formula or theorem from first principles, proving a mathematical statement by logical deduction, re-deriving a textbook result for verification or adaptation, extending a known result to a more general setting, or producing a self-contained derivation for a paper or thesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an answer is wanted from one named seat only: breaking, business, career, codebase, human, impact, innovation, moat, rent-seeking, skeptic, or stability. Not for multi-lens synthesis: use prism. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when replacing a greenfield attempt with a clean pad of verified requirements. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle. Requires a committed, VCS-recoverable attempt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户在面临投资/创业/职业选择，群体都在做一个方向但自己有疑虑、或在问"什么时候应该反着来""如何做出不同于大多数人的正确决策""共识什么时候是错的""怎么承受被误解的压力"时激活。 核心信号：用户在做一个与群体共识相反的决策，或者在考虑这样做。 不适用于：技术性问题、纯情感问题、不需要逆群体方向的常规决策。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。