「forcing」の検索結果

Author a complete both-seats coaching lesson for a BBA-NATIVE bidding scenario and produce all served artifacts in one consistent pass: curate the pool → tokenized coaching-curated/<scn>.pbn → gated promote to served coaching/<scn>.pbn → resolve to South=student coaching-non-rotated/<scn>.pbn (bridge-classroom) → update both toc.json files. Invoke as `/coach-lesson <Scenario>` (e.g. `/coach-lesson Fourth_Suit_Forcing`). Use ONLY for conventions BBA bids natively (its bba/<scn>.pbn [Auction] is the answer key — Basics, New_Minor_Forcing, Fourth_Suit_Forcing). For conventions BBA CANNOT bid (Spiral Raises), use the py/spiral_auction.py substitution path instead — not this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download NASA GES DISC NLDAS_FORA0125_H version 2.0 primary hourly forcing data for a point location. Use when Codex needs to retrieve NLDAS File A meteorological forcing from the GES DISC API or HTTPS archive for a longitude/latitude pair, including Earthdata username/password authentication, hourly URL generation, nearest-grid-point extraction, CSV output, or EcoSIM climate-forcing preprocessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert AmeriFlux ERA5 half-hourly meteorological CSV files into EcoSIM hourly climate forcing NetCDF files, compare generated forcing against overlapping measured tower meteorology when a FULLSET file is available, and report large biases or errors. Use when preparing or validating EcoSIM climate inputs for AmeriFlux sites, checking ERA5 against in situ records, diagnosing forcing discrepancies, or writing climate-quality reports. For non-AmeriFlux paper sites that need a fresh Copernicus CDS ERA5 point download by longitude/latitude, use era5-cds-point-download first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running security audits (`audit_cluster.sh`), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny and Dataplane V2 logging), isolating high-risk pods inside GKE Sandbox (`gVisor`), enforcing Pod Security Standards (`restricted` labeling) and pod securityContext, and mounting Secret Manager secrets via CSI (`SecretProviderClass`). Use when auditing workload security posture, isolating namespaces, applying pod security standards, or configuring network policies and secret volume mounts. Don't use for Workload Identity (use gke-workload-identity), cluster-wide control plane security, RBAC hardening, Binary Authorization, Shielded Nodes, or enabling platform-level GKE add-ons (use gke-platform-security instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures AWS Transit Gateway: creating a hub and attaching VPCs, segmenting traffic with route tables, centralizing egress and inspection through a hub (appliances or a Gateway Load Balancer endpoint), forcing east-west traffic between VPCs through AWS Network Firewall, connecting on-premises networks over the transit-gateway side of a Site-to-Site VPN or Direct Connect attachment (including ECMP to aggregate bandwidth across multiple VPN tunnels), peering transit gateways across Regions, migrating from a VPC peering mesh, and routing IP multicast. Applicable when connecting many VPCs through one router, isolating environments, forcing VPC-to-VPC traffic through a central Network Firewall, reaching on-premises over the hub, linking Regions, or moving off a peering mesh. Not applicable for single-VPC routing, VPC peering between two VPCs (vpcpeering skill), Direct Connect gateway or virtual interface setup (directconnect skill), or Route 53 DNS work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to apply Java exception handling best practices — including using specific exception types, managing resources with try-with-resources, securing exception messages, preserving error context via exception chaining, validating inputs early with fail-fast principles, handling thread interruption correctly, documenting exceptions with @throws, enforcing logging policy, translating exceptions at API boundaries, managing retries and idempotency, enforcing timeouts, attaching suppressed exceptions, and propagating failures in async/reactive code. This should trigger for requests such as Exception handling; Use try-with-resources in Java code; Create exception chaining in Java code; Apply fail-fast validation in Java code; Review Java exception taxonomy and propagation. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Climate physics, forcing, feedback, and attribution. Covers the greenhouse effect and radiative forcing, climate sensitivity, fast and slow feedbacks, the paleoclimate record, detection and attribution science, regional climate impacts, and the distinction between weather, climate variability, and forced climate change. Use when reasoning about global warming mechanisms, interpreting temperature or CO2 records, evaluating attribution claims for extreme events, or distinguishing signal from natural variability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running cluster security audits (`audit_cluster.sh`), configuring Workload Identity Federation (impersonation, KSA/GSA binding, and pod setup), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny and Dataplane V2 logging), isolating high-risk pods inside GKE Sandbox (`gVisor`), enforcing Pod Security Standards (`restricted` labeling), and mounting Secret Manager secrets via CSI (`SecretProviderClass`). Use when auditing cluster security posture, isolating namespaces, applying pod security standards, setting up Workload Identity, or configuring network policies and secret volume mounts. Don't use for cluster-wide control plane security, RBAC hardening, Binary Authorization, Shielded Nodes, or enabling platform-level GKE add-ons (use gke-platform-security instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level climatology covering climate system components, climate forcing and feedbacks, paleoclimatology, climate modeling, and climate change science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build EcoSIM atmospheric greenhouse-gas forcing files by combining a historical monthly atmgas NetCDF with RCMIP/CMIP6 SSP concentration pathways. Use when Codex needs SSP245/SSP585 or other SSP atmospheric CO2, CH4, and N2O concentrations, key-year tables, or scenario NetCDF files spanning historical years through 2100 for EcoSIM or related biogeochemical forcing workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download Copernicus CDS ERA5 single-level point time-series climate forcing for non-US or non-NLDAS EcoSIM sites from longitude/latitude coordinates. Use when a paper-derived site is outside the NLDAS domain, lacks AmeriFlux/FLUXNET curated forcing, or needs global ERA5 variables such as 2m temperature, dewpoint temperature, surface pressure, solar radiation, precipitation, and 10m wind components for EcoSIM preprocessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claudeの初回編集やファイル作成をいったん止め、呼び出し元・データ構造・依頼内容の確認を促すフックを設定し、変更前の調査を組み込むスキル。

• 編集前に影響するモジュールを調べたいとき
• 変更前にデータ構造を確認したいとき
• テストや生成ファイルの除外設定

Claude Codeの終了時に学習記録の更新日時やディスク空き容量を確認し、条件に応じて完了を止めるスキル。会話中の手順省略を示す表現にも警告します。

• 複雑な編集後に学習記録を確認したいとき
• 空き容量不足で完了を止めたいとき
• 確認省略を示す表現の検出

Setting up or installing into a Python environment. One rule applies whether or not you read the body - the environment belongs with the project, so create it inside the project directory (.venv) or let uv manage it, and never in a scratch directory like /tmp and never by forcing an install into the system interpreter. Load the body before creating a virtualenv, choosing an installer, or writing run instructions for a Python project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Kubernetes security policies including NetworkPolicy, PodSecurityPolicy, and RBAC for production-grade security. Use when securing Kubernetes clusters, implementing network isolation, or enforcing pod security standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and prevent dependency confusion (public-over-private package name resolution) in npm, PyPI, and Maven by enumerating claimable internal package names with tools like `confused` and OWASP `dep-scan`, then enforcing source restrictions via `.npmrc`, `pip.conf`/`pyproject.toml`, and Maven `settings.xml`. Use when onboarding a repo to a supply-chain security program, auditing lockfiles/manifests for confusable dependencies, or after an incident that may have leaked internal package names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardens LDAP directory services against credential harvesting, LDAP injection, anonymous binding, and channel-binding bypass by enforcing LDAPS, channel binding, and LDAP signing. Use when securing an LDAP or Active Directory environment against these attack classes or auditing directory service configurations for these vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys and configures Tailscale (or self-hosted Headscale) as a WireGuard-based zero trust mesh VPN, setting up identity-aware ACLs, exit nodes, subnet routers, and MagicDNS for encrypted peer-to-peer connectivity. Use when replacing traditional VPN servers with an identity-authenticated mesh network or enforcing granular per-device access control lists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply bottom-up and top-down role mining techniques, including clustering algorithms and formal concept analysis, to discover optimal RBAC roles from existing user-permission assignments, consolidating overlapping roles and enforcing least privilege. Use when an identity program needs to reduce role explosion or redesign its RBAC role set from access data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:compliance-readiness <program> — Multi-framework compliance officer 6-question forcing interrogation of any compliance program. Use before starting a new framework, planning the annual audit calendar, or preparing for certification stage 1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Founder-mode executive team. 13 cs-* C-suite agents (CFO, CMO, CRO, CPO, COO, CHRO, CISO, GC, CDO, CAIO, CCO, VPE, Chief of Staff) and 21 /cs:* slash commands for forcing-question office hours, multi-role boardroom deliberation, strategic sprint pipeline, and meta routing. Use when the founder needs a virtual executive team, when invoking /cs:* commands, or when orchestrating multi-role decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。